On 17 Sep 2004 at 10:40, Charles T. Meyer wrote: > While he is > rigid and won't give up his principals. so am I and most of us hold > strong beliefs in the right to life debate If he defines life as > beginning at conception I believe he should be angry at the slaughter > of children. What he doesn't hear and what I strongly disagree with > him about is the forcing of others to go along with his definitions > of when life begins. That interferes with my wife and my daughter's > ability to CHOOSE whether to allow a pregnancy to come to term > potentially . The word "rigid" has a pejorative connotation. I prefer "consistent" or even "unwavering". And, I do not advocate "forcing" anything upon others (although I will use every means of persuasion to try and encourage others to avoid the behavior which I oppose). The issue (politically) is that I object to using my tax money to finance things which I believe are wrong (just as I did with the Vietnam War, for example). >>I strongly disagree with your position on abortion but will defend your right to express it. YOu have the right to be wrong.<< When my first wife (deceased) first began to date me, she found a comment in a magazine, cut it out, and kept it in her wallet under my photograph. It read: "In moments controversial, my perception is quite fine I clearly see both points of view The one that's wrong, and mine...." Nothing has changed. :-) Best, Bob Robert A. Fink, M. D., F.A.C.S., P. C. Neurological Surgery 2500 Milvia Street Suite 222 Berkeley, CA 94704-2636 USA 510-849-2555 FAX: 510-849-2557 <http://www.rafink.com/> "Ex Tristitia Virtus" Disclaimer: That which is written in my e-mail is not to be considered as "medical advice". Such advice can only be given after a formal, in-person, consultation between doctor and patient. ********************************************** ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask] In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn