Print

Print


US Scientists, Angered By Bush Policies, Side With Kerry (AFP)

11 October 2004

WASHINGTON - Prominent US scientists, including several Nobel laureates, have
taken Senator John Kerry’s side in the country’s presidential campaign, blasting
President George W. Bush for his opposition to stem cell research and his
environmental record.

Some 5,000 researchers and engineers joined 48 Nobel laureates in a June letter
accusing the Bush administration of ignoring ”unbiased scientific advice in the
policymaking that is so important to our collective welfare.”

Charging that the Republican president was “compromising our future,” the
scientists said they support Kerry in the November 2 election because “he will
restore science to its appropriate place in government.”

In late September, a group called Scientists and Engineers for Change, which
includes 10 Nobel laureates, hit the campaign trail in the most disputed US states to
denounce Bush’s policies.

“From downgrading of the position of science adviser, to tepid support for scientific
funding and opportunities, to distorting scientific advice and findings, the Bush
administration has pioneered a less-than ethical approach to scientific policymaking
that will harm our nation for years to come,” the group says on its website.

Admonishing the president’s critics, Bush’s science adviser John Marburger said, “I
don’t like to see science exploited for political purposes.”

The science community has also come down hard against Bush over his decision to
restrict publicly funded stem cell research.

Stem cell research supporters argue that the science could be used to find a cure to
diseases such as Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s.

In August 2001, Bush banned the use of public funds for stem cell research using
human embryos, apart from those previously cultivated. The ban did not apply to
private sector research.

“The really important questions here are ethical questions, not science questions,”
Marburger said.

Kerry has vowed to remove Bush’s restrictions, if elected president.

To counter Bush’s position, Democrats recruited the son of the late former president
Ronald Reagan to speak at the Democratic National Convention in July.

Ron Reagan, whose father died after a long struggle with Alzheimer’s disease, said,
“We can choose between the future and the past, between reason and ignorance,
between true compassion and mere ideology.”

Scientists also accuse the administration of excluding views from advisory boards
critical of Bush policy.

Several climate experts have complained that they were unable to include in official
reports information linking pollution and global warming.

“It’s so egregious what this administration is doing, particularly in regards to the
environment,” said Herbert Needleman, a physicist at the University of Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania. “And their whole approach to global warming has been ignorant and
cynical.”

Vincent Cerf, one of the Internet’s architects and a Republican, accused the
administration of making drastic budget cuts that could cost the United States’
scientific advances, a charge the White House denies.

“Science counts, and it has not counted sufficiently in this administration,” Cerf said.
“The United States is at risk of losing the edge.”

SOURCE: Khaleej Times
http://tinyurl.com/6v98c

* * *

----------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn