Print

Print


CALIFORNIA: Two Fathers Take Causes to Ballot Box

Motivated by their sons, they spend more than $5.6 million of their
personal fortunes to put Propositions 66 and 71 before voters.

By Megan Garvey
Times Staff Writer

October 31, 2004

Behind two of the highest-profile measures on Tuesday's ballot stands
one of the oldest of human motivations: fathers seeking to help their
sons.

They are not ordinary fathers. Bob Klein, the man behind Proposition
71, the stem cell ballot initiative, and Jerry Keenan, who brought to
a vote Proposition 66, the three-strikes amendment, together have
spent more than $5.6 million of their personal fortunes pursuing
their chosen causes.

Klein's 14-year-old son, Jordan, suffers from juvenile diabetes — a
disease that Klein and others believe could eventually be cured using
therapies derived from embryonic stem cells. Keenan's only child,
Richard, is serving an eight-year sentence in prison for a car
accident that left two of his passengers dead and one hurt. Should
Proposition 66 pass, his time behind bars might be shortened.

The ballot measures have drawn both men into the public eye.

Klein has campaigned statewide for Proposition 71. If it passes, he
would be in position to become head of the California Institute for
Regenerative Medicine, which the measure would create. The post would
give him influence over the $3 billion the measure would distribute
during the next 10 years to researchers across the state. Opponents
of the measure say the institute would distribute taxpayer money with
virtually no government oversight.

Deeply personal causes are not unusual in the initiative process —
crimes against children drove the three-strikes law to passage a
decade ago. What is new is for a ballot measure to draw so directly
on both the emotional capital and financial resources of parents
whose children could directly benefit.

"I think it's fascinating. Now it is a parent as opposed to people
who just felt strongly about an issue," said Robert Stern, president
of the nonprofit Center for Government Studies in Los Angeles. "The
question is: Is it better or worse than the special interest and
labor unions pushing their agendas? I think it's about the same.
Wealthy interests are able to buy their way onto the ballot."

When President Bush announced in August 2001 that he had decided to
strictly limit how federal funds could be used for stem cell
research, Bob Klein watched on television.

"At the time, I'm not sure I understood what it meant," he said in a
recent interview.

A year later, when his son was diagnosed with insulin-dependent
diabetes, which can shorten a life span by decades, Klein took on the
pursuit of a cure.

His search, he said, led him to the field of embryonic stem cells.

The field is controversial because embryos must be destroyed in order
to obtain embryonic stem cells, which have the potential to become
any type of cell in the body. Because of that potential, many
scientists believe embryonic stem cells hold great promise in the
treatment and understanding of diseases such as Alzheimer's,
Parkinson's and diabetes.

What separated Klein from other parents desperate to cure a child's
debilitating illness was an idea, combined with the means and
connections to put it into action. With a background in the financing
of affordable housing, Klein believed that California could replace
the federal government as the source of funds for research and create
what he envisioned as a "substitute national program."

The idea quickly took shape as a $3-billion bond initiative, the
amount Klein determined would be needed to provide research grants as
well as facilities to insulate the research from political
interference.

In the mid-1970s, not long after graduating from Stanford University,
Klein helped create the California Housing Finance Agency. Since
1975, the state agency, which supports itself through revenue bonds,
has lent more than $12 billion to first-time homeowners. Klein used
that agency as a template to guide his vision for financing research.

Klein spent the better part of a year selling his idea — first to
scientists, then to major donors, who chipped in more than $20
million, and now to voters. In doing so, he has sparingly sprinkled
in his personal experience. He always mentions that his son has
juvenile diabetes and his mother suffers from Alzheimer's.

Asked about the criticism that wealthy people have an unfair
advantage getting their issues on the ballot, he said he sees not an
advantage but a duty.

"I think people who earn the most money in this society have an
obligation to give back to society," he said.

Klein said he crafted his measure — and took it directly to voters —
to protect the research from political interference or financial
raids by state legislators.

Opponents of the measure, however, say Klein's initiative insulates a
vast sum from any meaningful scrutiny.

"The oversight committee is anything but independent," said Francine
Coeytaux, who served on the California Advisory Committee on Human
Cloning. "It's made up of academics and scientists whose careers
depend on the research and biotech people and disease advocates — the
conflict of interest is inherent in the structure of the committee.
It reveals an extraordinary hubris on the part of the backers."

Opponents of the measure suggest that Klein is positioning himself to
run the institute — a suggestion that he does not deny, saying only
that he could not afford to take the position for very long.

SOURCE: The Los Angeles Times / KTLA5, CA
http://tinyurl.com/4zn3q

* * *

.Murray Charters <[log in to unmask]>
Please place this address in your address book
Please purge all others

Web site: Parkinsons Resources on the WWWeb
http://www.geocities.com/murraycharters

----------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn