Print

Print


-----Original Message-----
From: [log in to unmask]
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of [log in to unmask]
Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2004 1:05 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: NYTimes.com Article: U.S. Drops Effort for Treaty Banning Cloning

The article below from NYTimes.com
has been sent to you by [log in to unmask]



/--------- E-mail Sponsored by Fox Searchlight ------------\

SIDEWAYS - NOW PLAYING IN SELECT CITIES

An official selection of the New York Film Festival and the
Toronto International Film Festival, SIDEWAYS is the new
comedy from Alexander Payne, director of ELECTION and ABOUT
SCHMIDT.  Starring Paul Giamatti, Thomas Haden Church,
Sandra Oh and Virginia Madsen. Watch the trailer at:

http://www.foxsearchlight.com/sideways/index_nyt.html

\----------------------------------------------------------/


U.S. Drops Effort for Treaty Banning Cloning

November 20, 2004
 By WARREN HOGE





UNITED NATIONS, Nov. 19 - Faced with polarizing division in
the 191-member General Assembly, the United States on
Friday abandoned its aggressively pursued attempt to obtain
a United Nations treaty banning all human cloning,
including that done in the name of medical research.

The outcome - an agreement to come up with a nonbinding
declaration against cloning to reproduce humans - fell far
short of the American goal and represented a setback for
President Bush. He called for a worldwide ban on all
cloning when he addressed the United Nations General
Assembly in August, and he made limiting stem cell and
other related research an issue in his presidential
campaign.

All 191 United Nations members have agreed on the need for
a treaty to prohibit reproductive cloning. But a vote has
been stalled for three years by sharp differences over
whether to broaden the ban, as the United States wishes, to
prohibit cloning to create stem cells for research, part of
a field known as therapeutic cloning.

The push for a total ban has set the Bush administration
against close allies like Britain and much of the world's
scientific establishment, who contend that it would block
research on cancer, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's
disease, diabetes, spinal cord injuries, multiple sclerosis
and other conditions. The White House argues that enough
stem cells from human embryos exist for research and that
cloning an embryo for any reason is unethical.

Negotiations have been going on for more than a year in the
General Assembly's legal committee, which draws up
treaties. A vote was scheduled for Friday on two competing
versions, but with scant hope of the kind of consensus
emerging considered necessary for an effective treaty.

The United States backed a resolution proposed by Costa
Rica to outlaw all forms of human cloning, while opponents
of such an absolute prohibition supported a Belgian measure
banning reproductive cloning outright and offering nations
three options for therapeutic cloning: outlawing it,
putting a moratorium on the practice, or regulating it
through national legislation to prevent misuse.

Instead of proceeding to a showdown vote on Friday night,
the committee agreed instead to take up a nonbinding
declaration proposed by Italy with ambiguous language that
avoided raising objections and to schedule meetings in
February to shape the final wording. The Italians' proposal
prohibits "any attempts to create human life through
cloning processes and any research intended to achieve that
aim."

Regardless of what language emerges, the result will be a
declaration, not a treaty, which would have been the
outcome had either the Costa Rican or Belgian versions been
adopted. Because of that, nations will be under
considerably less pressure to change their existing views
on cloning.

"A declaration is important for what it's not," said
Bernard Siegel, the executive director of the Genetics
Policy Institute, who had lobbied against the American-led
campaign. "It is not a treaty, it is nonbinding, and it
will have no chilling effect on therapeutic cloning, and
stem cell research will advance. We consider this a
triumph."

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/20/international/20nations.html?ex=1101981079
&ei=1&en=e2d8fb999679fc75


---------------------------------

Get Home Delivery of The New York Times Newspaper. Imagine
reading The New York Times any time & anywhere you like!
Leisurely catch up on events & expand your horizons. Enjoy
now for 50% off Home Delivery! Click here:

http://homedelivery.nytimes.com/HDS/SubscriptionT1.do?mode=SubscriptionT1&Ex
ternalMediaCode=W24AF



HOW TO ADVERTISE
---------------------------------
For information on advertising in e-mail newsletters
or other creative advertising opportunities with The
New York Times on the Web, please contact
[log in to unmask] or visit our online media
kit at http://www.nytimes.com/adinfo

For general information about NYTimes.com, write to
[log in to unmask]

Copyright 2004 The New York Times Company

----------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn