Print

Print


FROM: New York Times
January 17, 2005
Fearing New York May Fall Behind, Senator Proposes Stem Cell Institute
By MIKE McINTIRE

Hoping to catch up to other states that are aggressively supporting
research on embryonic stem cells, Democratic leaders in the New York
Senate announced legislation yesterday that would commit $1 billion to a
similar effort in New York.

The proposal, offered by David A. Paterson, the Senate Democratic leader,
calls for the creation of a New York stem cell institute to regulate
research in the field, as well as make loans and grants to organizations
and companies. It is similar to an initiative under way in California,
which approved a $3 billion stem cell research fund last year, and to a
$380 million proposal announced last week by New Jersey's acting
governor, Richard J. Codey.

Mr. Paterson drew attention to California at a news conference at City
Hall, saying its program, which is poised to begin making its first
research grants within months, represents "our chief competition."

"Of course, New York still has an advantage because of our vast
intellectual power and network of public and private universities,
research centers and medical facilities," he said. "But that gap is
closing."

Senator Eric T. Schneiderman, a Manhattan Democrat, bluntly warned that
New York stood to suffer economically if it did not act soon to support
private-sector research initiatives. "If the state of New York doesn't
recognize the competitive need, our research scientists are all going to
change their tune from 'I love New York' to 'California, Here I Come' in
a very short period of time," he said. "We have a very narrow window to
meet the challenge."

Mr. Paterson made his announcement two days before Gov. George E. Pataki
is to present his 2006 state budget proposal. The senator said that he
hoped the governor, a Republican, would eventually include the money in
the budget for the next fiscal year, which begins in April, but that the
administration had not yet expressed an opinion on the matter.

Jennifer Meicht, a spokeswoman for the governor, said the administration
would not comment on Mr. Paterson's proposal until it had reviewed it.
"Generally, the governor has been supportive of the concept of stem cell
research," she said.

Under Mr. Paterson's proposal, the state would borrow up to $1 billion
over 10 years. Unless the governor includes funding for it in his budget,
the project stands little chance of becoming reality. The initiative
would require approval by voters in a referendum, which Mr. Paterson said
he favored putting on the ballot later this year.

With the state facing a projected $6 billion deficit next year, growing
to $7.7 billion the year after that, it is unclear how much support there
will be in Albany for adding hundreds of millions of dollars to the debt
burden. Senator Liz Krueger, a Manhattan Democrat who has proposed a law
to create ethical guidelines for stem cell research, said that the
roughly $100 million a year to finance the institute was relatively small
in the context of the state's $100 billion budget.

Ms. Krueger said that while it was important that New York move quickly
to provide financial incentives to the growing industry, it was
imperative that the state not cede too much control to the private
sector.

"I personally think that California, having moved its money to the table,
made some mistakes in how they went forward," she said. "To be honest,
they didn't build in enough government oversight and control, and they
may have in fact given too much of the decision-making to the biotech
industries."

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/17/nyregion/17stem.html?pagewanted=print&p
osition=

----------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn