 |
 |
Gentlemen: OK, How about addressing the other part of the statement, the part about the church being fixed and opposed to change by trying to hang on to some long past events all described differently by a confusion of religions. Things that don't change are dead. Ned ----- Original Message ----- From: "Wenwolf" <[log in to unmask]> To: <[log in to unmask]> Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 8:27 PM Subject: FW: Moral certainty > Good point Raj. But in the meantime, science makes a lot of mistakes. In > addition, "truth" is a tricky concept, open to multiple interpretations. > Furthermore, scientists know that nothing is ever "proven". As I > mentioned, things that are "proven" today are often "disproven" > tomorrow. > > Wendy > > -----Original Message----- > From: Parkinson's Information Exchange Network > [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of R.Rajaraman > Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2005 8:44 PM > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Re: Moral certainty > > Ned: > Science is after the ultimate truth, not necessaily change. > Raj > ************** > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ned Gardner" <[log in to unmask]> > To: <[log in to unmask]> > Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2005 9:53 AM > Subject: Re: Moral certainty > > >> Wendy: >> >> Science is in search of change, to change the way we think and act. > Science >> likes change. Religion on the other hand is fixed and tries not to > change. >> >> Ned >> >> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: > mailto:[log in to unmask] > In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask] In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn