Good point Raj. But in the meantime, science makes a lot of mistakes. In
addition, "truth" is a tricky concept, open to multiple interpretations.
Furthermore, scientists know that nothing is ever "proven". As I
mentioned, things that are "proven" today are often "disproven"
tomorrow.
Wendy
-----Original Message-----
From: Parkinson's Information Exchange Network
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of R.Rajaraman
Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2005 8:44 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Moral certainty
Ned:
Science is after the ultimate truth, not necessaily change.
Raj
**************
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ned Gardner" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2005 9:53 AM
Subject: Re: Moral certainty
> Wendy:
>
> Science is in search of change, to change the way we think and act.
Science
> likes change. Religion on the other hand is fixed and tries not to
change.
>
> Ned
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn
