I have to say, I don't think that concurrent sessions would work very well. Part of the power of Inkshed comes from the fact that people have a shared experience - one session feeds into another in very unexpected and rich ways. I wasn't at PEI, but I'm intrigued by the poster session idea. Seems like that format would work well; people would engage to a greater or lesser degree with the various posters, but still, they'd all be available for review. Maybe the poster session could be followed up by inkshedding, and then a question-and-answer period. That period could be concurrent, in the sense that posters could be clustered by topic, and the Q&A for each topic cluster could take place simultaneously (perhaps with someone assigned to summarize questions and answers in writing for the whole group). Just a thought . . . I'd hate to see concurrent sessions for 'regular' (not the best word but I'm at a loss for a better one) sessions. I think we'd lose more than we'd gain. Marcy ++++++++++++++++++++ Marcy Bauman [log in to unmask] "When I see an adult on a bicycle, I do not despair for the future of the human race." H. G. Wells (1866 - 1946) +++++++++++++++++++++ -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- To leave the list, send a SIGNOFF CASLL command to [log in to unmask] or, if you experience difficulties, write to Russ Hunt at [log in to unmask] For the list archives and information about the organization, its newsletter, and the annual conference, go to http://www.stu.ca/inkshed/ -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-