 |
 |
Hi Dee, I called Christy Hahn of PAN and we finally got this thing figured out. Franks' office wanted to throw me some kind of a bone with Ross' reference to PAN and some kind of toxin studies on Parkinson he supports that the federal government is doing. They finally got around to the "ethical" issue after much tap-dancing. What I worry about is the other lies and misrepresentations being given when a caller asks, "why did Franks vote "NO" on HR 810?" If I hadn't lost my cool I could have found out more about those better alternatives. These games are not amusing when lives are at stake. Ray ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dolores Buente" <[log in to unmask]> To: <[log in to unmask]> Sent: Monday, May 30, 2005 12:35 PM Subject: Re: Dee/Trent Frank's no vote on HR 810 > Dear Ray, > > Thank you for following up with me on the Trent Frank incident. From the > information I've gathered, it appears that the person you spoke to was > either > confused or intentionally attempting to put you off by fabricating > information. Either way, he apparently did not know with whom he was > dealing when he > tried to pass that one off on you. It would be a shame to think that > they > would purposely try to influence a less knowledgeable caller into > thinking that > PAN was opposed to HR 810. But then, when it comes to politics, it isn't > too > unexpected. > > David Rossie's op-ed hit the nail square on the head! Thanks for posting > that article to the List. His sentiments are mine exactly and I feel > that the > general public is finally beginning to see the hypocrisy of Bush's > posture on > the stem cell issue. Funny how the truth shines through when the facts > are > laid out and examined. > > The sad fact remains that, with his veto power, George W. Bush can still > put > a stranglehold on embryonic stem cell research. He is indebted to the > religious extremist groups who have brought him to power and it looks > like they are > calling the shots in America today. > > Dee > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: > mailto:[log in to unmask] > In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask] In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn