Print

Print


The source of this article is MSNBC: http://tinyurl.com/9yqck

Scientists find key to stem cell immortality
MicroRNAs short-circuit cellular ‘stop signals’

By Alan Boyle
Science editor
MSNBC
Updated: 9:26 p.m. ET June 8, 2005


One of the medical marvels of stem cells is that they continue to divide 
and renew themselves when other cells would quit. But what is it that gives 
stem cells this kind of immortality?

Researchers report in the journal Nature that microRNAs — tiny snippets of 
genetic material that have now been linked to growth regulation in normal 
cells as well as cancer growth in abnormal cells — appear to shut off the 
"stop signals" or brakes that would normally tell cells to stop dividing.

"What we think we see is that there is a special mechanism to get rid of 
the brakes," said University of Washington biochemist Hannele 
Ruohola-Baker, a leading member of the research team.

Stem cells have been the focus of intense research interest because of 
their role in regenerating all the body's tissue types, from blood cells to 
brain cells. MicroRNAs could conceivably be harnessed to give a boost to 
aging stem cells, or even add some of the qualities of stem cells to more 
ordinary types of cells, Ruohola-Baker told MSNBC.com.

Link to cancer
Too much of the wrong kinds of microRNAs could be a bad thing: In fact, 
three other studies in Thursday's issue of Nature linked certain 
combinations of microRNAs to cancer:

One team of researchers reported that a cluster of microRNAs can cause 
blood cancer in mice, and was also apparently linked to a variety of human 
tumors.
Another found that some microRNAs cooperate with a gene known as c-Myc that 
is already known to cause human cancers.
The third team found that different human cancers have different microRNA 
signatures — suggesting that doctors might someday use microRNA profiles to 
diagnose human tumors.
In a commentary, Dr. Paul Meltzer of the National Human Genome Research 
Institute said microRNAs "are now definitely linked to the development of 
cancer." But one of the researchers involved in the c-Myc study, Dr. Chi 
Dang of the Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, emphasized that microRNAs 
can have a beneficial as well as a detrimental effect on cell function.

"Whether too much or too little of these or other microRNAs is a good thing 
or a bad thing — whether it would contribute to or help prevent cancer — 
depends on their targets in the cell," he said in a Johns Hopkins news release.


Nature distributed the study on microRNAs and stem cells online on 
Wednesday in advance of next week's print publication, in part to mesh with 
the three cancer studies.

"For a long time, stem cells and cancer cells have been compared," 
Ruohola-Baker said. "They are similar in that they don't listen to the 
'stop signals.' ... I would imagine that the next two years are going to be 
very exciting trying to analyze this."


How microRNAs work
In a cell's molecular machinery, strands of ribonucleic acid, or RNA, help 
turn the genetic code contained in DNA's double helix into instructions for 
making the proteins needed by the cell. MicroRNAs are short bits of RNA 
that are thought to act as control dials for the machinery. About 200 human 
microRNAs have been identified, but researchers are still trying to figure 
out exactly what they do.

"Nine years ago, we knew nothing about microRNAs," Ruohola-Baker said. "It 
is a system that is totally against the conventional dogma of biology. They 
are made to stop other RNA from making proteins."

Ruohola-Baker's research focuses on fruit flies, which have about 80 types 
of microRNA. She and her colleagues from the University of Washington and 
Northwestern University genetically modified female fruit flies so that 
their ovaries produced normal stem cells as well as stem cells in which the 
microRNAs were deactivated. Then they compared how many egg chambers were 
produced by each type of stem cells.

The results showed a falling egg production rate over the course of eight 
to 12 days, and the researchers determined that was because the mutant stem 
cells were no longer dividing.

The stem cells didn't transform themselves into different types of cells, 
Ruohola-Baker said: "They kept their 'stem-cellness.' The only thing that 
was wrong is that they did not divide."

The researchers concluded that when the microRNAs were knocked out of 
commission, the stem cells obeyed the same stop signal that kept other 
types of cells from proliferating. Their experiments indicated that a 
protein called Dacapo — the fruit fly's equivalent of a human tumor 
suppressor — served as the stop signal.

But exactly which of the fruit fly's 80 microRNAs is responsible for 
short-circuiting the stop signal and keeping stem cells dividing? That's 
one of the questions Ruohola-Baker and her colleagues plan to address next. 
Ruohola-Baker said they'll focus first on five likely suspects that were 
identified through computer simulations of the cell's chemical interactions.

Help for aging stem cells?
And now that the researchers have found that too few microRNAs are bad for 
stem cells, they want to see what an abundance of microRNAs will do. 
Perhaps the right recipe can give even ordinary cells a touch of 
"stem-cellness."

"We are right now testing that, by overproducing microRNAs in the daughter 
cells that have begun to differentiate," Ruohola-Baker said. "Maybe this 
would also help aging stem cells. Maybe you can keep them dividing by using 
more microRNAs."

Ruohola-Baker's colleagues on the research team are Steve Hatfield, Halyna 
Shcherbata and Karin Fischer of the University of Washington; and Richard 
Carthew and Kenji Nakahara of Northwestern University.

© 2005 MSNBC Interactive
© 2005 MSNBC.com

URL: http://msnbc.msn.com/id/8135713/

----------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn