 |
 |
Well I'll comment while I still can. Rejection of embryos with serious defects AND abortion should be decisions left to the people involved, not right-wing religious onlookers., Ray ----- Original Message ----- From: "Phil Tompkins" <[log in to unmask]> To: <[log in to unmask]> Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 2:48 PM Subject: Neumayr article > An op ed article by George Neumayr reprinted in the Seattle Post- > Intelligencer this past Sunday > http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/opinion/232776_focus17.html > attempts to enlist sympathy for disabled people into the pro-life > movement. Mr. Neumayr bemoans the fact that "each year in America > fewer and fewer disabled infants are born" because prenatal screening > has provided "a eugenics designed to weed out the disabled." I'm > sorry to bring up the abortion debate, but this one just got to me. > I'm sure someone would like to comment. > > Phil Tompkins > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: > mailto:[log in to unmask] > In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask] In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn