 |
 |
This is not my opinion so please don't start an argument with me. Sometimes the expression "Don't shoot the messenger" seems to apply here. So at the risk of getting "shot," for clarification's sake, I think the objection of a lot of a lot of the Religious Right (among other things that they have been called) is not what ultimately happens to the embryos but what may ultimately happen as a result of embryonic experimentation. In order words, once it begins, where will it lead? At least this is what I have been told. It applies to both ends of the age spectrum. Don't "euthanize" the elderly and don't experiment on embryos (two vulnerable and often helpless populations) because it will open the door to other things that may have more sinister motives and uses. Disclaimer: Again, I'm just stating what I have gleaned. This is NOT necessarily my personal opinion. Carole M. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Amanda Phillips" <[log in to unmask]> To: <[log in to unmask]> Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 3:05 PM Subject: Re: 60 Minutes Surplus Embryo Report page 1 >I still don't get it , why is using the surplus for research worse than > letting them rot ? > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: > mailto:[log in to unmask] > In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask] In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn