 |
 |
I (among others possibly) said that - yes of course there's an ethical problem, I'm trying to help solve it. Denial, yelling and throwing things won't help. I'd prefer it unnecessary to use the surplus (only the surplus) balstocysts which would otherwise be wasted - It'd be even nicer to give them a chance to become human - but they're not and won't be, while those who already live suffer now. Priorities ? In a message dated 24/02/06 07:00:53 GMT Standard Time, [log in to unmask] writes: > As for the lady who said something like , '' ... if it's only a blob in a > dish, it isn't human, so what's the problem...". The problem is it's alive > [egg+sperm] albeit invitro, it's the first part of the human form; with it's > DNA code that will, if allowed to live become a human being. This has made > me think abount IVF Clinics and Sperm banks as having crossed the line from > health care to significant businesses; just like Plastic Surgeory. My IVF > question. For couples having difficulty conceiving, the solution(I think is > usually IVF) But if they can takes eggs and sperm and reimplant several eggs > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask] In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn