Print

Print


Not too long ago I reported that after 7 years of study, they had concluded
that Selegeline (Eldepryl) was neuroprotective. Below (at end) is the recent
finding is the study I read to make that conclusion.

However, I just received a further explanation from a movement disorder
specialist at Vanderbilt (Nashville, TN) that I stated this incorrectly.
Read his explanation:

"Unfortunately that study looked only at the symptoms of Parkinson's disease
and not disease progression. In there study design, any agent that provides
symptomatic benefit will slow the progressions of symptoms. The authors
state in their discussion that they can not comment on the possible
neuroprotective effects of selegiline. As you know, there are many potential
neuroprotective agents in various stages of study and the universal
difficulty has been the lack of a reliable biomarker of disease progression
that is not effected by symptomatic therapy

by Dr. Thomas Davis
Associate Professor of Neurology
Director, Division of Movement Disorders
Vanderbilt University School of Medicine

This just goes to show you that the untrained eye can be easily misled.
Peggy


Neurology. 2006 Mar 15; [Epub ahead of print]

Selegiline slows the progression of the symptoms of Parkinson disease.
Abstract-- OBJECTIVE: To study the long-term effects of selegiline in
monotherapy and in combination with levodopa in the early phase of Parkinson
disease (PD).

METHODS: One hundred fifty-seven de novo PD patients were randomized in a
double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 7 years' duration. In the
monotherapy part, selegiline significantly delayed the initiation of
levodopa therapy vs placebo. The authors now report the results from the
combination part of the study, in which 140 patients received selegiline or
placebo in addition to individually tailored levodopa therapy.

RESULTS: Compared with placebo, selegiline slowed the progression of disease
disability as measured by the Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale
(UPDRS)total score (p = 0.003) or by motor (p = 0.002) and Activities of
Daily Living (p = 0.0002) subscores. After 5 years in combination therapy,
the mean difference in the UPDRS total score was nearly 10 points, with
patients receiving placebo having 35% higher scores. Simultaneously,
patients receiving placebo needed progressively higher doses of levodopa
than patients receiving selegiline; after 5 years, the mean dosage of
levodopa was 19% higher with placebo than with selegiline (p = 0.0002).
Considering the entire (monotherapy and combination therapy) 7-year study
time, there was a trend for selegiline to delay the start of wearing-off
fluctuations
(hazard ratio 0.55, p = 0.08). In both phases of the study, selegiline was
safe and well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS: The results of this long-term study confirm earlier findings
indicating that selegiline delays the progression of the signs and symptoms
of Parkinson disease.

PMID: 16540603 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

----------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn