Print

Print


-- rayilynlee <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
The People vs. Amgen

Clinical trial participants rarely sue pharma companies for 
discontinuing an unsafe drug. Here's what happened when two such 
cases were brought to court.....

Thanks Ray for posting the article “The People vs Amgen” from 
Pharmaceutical Executive. It appears the second half of  the article 
was cut off. I'll try to repost it. Also the full text is available 
at:
http://www.pharmexec.com/pharmexec/article/articleDetail.jsp?
id=333300&pageID=1

My comments on the article:
The pharmaceutical industry may consider the judge’s decision  
against further GDNF treatment to be a victory – but it was a defeat 
not only for the trial participants, but for all PWP. We have all 
been robbed of a potential effective and safe treatment, that might 
have been well into phase III trials by now. The article described 
the legal aspects of this case, but didn't touch on the medical and 
ethical issues.  The Parkinson’s Pipeline Project and the GrassRoots 
Connection have been following the GDNF controversy since the trial 
halt. The following important facts were omitted from the 
Pharmaceutical Executive article

In two Phase I trials of GDNF conducted by the University of Kentucky 
and Frenchay Hospital in Bristol, UK, 15 out of 15 subjects improved. 
Two years later improvements continued.
 
An autopsy of one of these subjects who died of unrelated causes 
revealed resprouting of neurons in the area treated with GDNF, the 
first time evidence of  such regrowth has been reported. 
 
The published Phase II results supporting Amgen’s claim of  lack of 
efficacy have been questioned and described as ‘inconclusive “ by a 
number  by  independent scientists, as well as trial doctors.

The fact that the phase II trial utilized a lower dose of GDNF  and a 
different catheter system made it impossible to meaningfully compare 
the two trials.  Parkinson’s researchers have recommended that 
another phase II/phase III trial should be conducted. Even Amgen’s 
own scientists had advised they continue on to a phase III trial.

The FDA had approved compassionate use of GDNF for the existing trial 
patients – but Amgen refused to supply it.

Although Amgen made numerous PR statements about safety concerns such 
as the presence of antibodies in some subjects and cerebellar lesions 
in a small number of test monkeys, they have still not released their 
scientific data to prove these claims.  However, other researchers 
have published research articles showing no evidence of serious side 
effects among human or primate subjects treated with GDNF.
 
The lesions in monkeys were likely due to abrupt withdrawal from 
extremely high doses of GDNF – much higher than the doses given to 
any of the human subjects.

Other methods of GDNF delivery are being currently investigated, such 
as gene therapy or stem cells,  but they are years away from clinical 
use. The current GDNF clinical trial participants will  probably not 
be eligible for other trials if any become available. In effect, they 
have donated their brains to science, while they are still alive.

The article claims that FDA regulations  “mandate that the study 
investigators must obtain the informed consent of each human subject 
to whom the drug will be administered, and that they are responsible 
for protecting the rights, safety, and welfare of subjects under 
their care.”  How could the trial doctors possibly  protect their 
subjects’ well being when they had no input into the decision to halt 
the trial or to provide compassionate use for the participants? This 
decision was made unilaterally by Amgen, over the objections of a 
number of the trial doctors.

If pharmaceutical companies treat clinical trial volunteers with 
little concern for their welfare, the small percentage of patients 
who are willing to volunteer  for clinical trials will be even 
smaller in the future.
The rights and safety of clinical trial participants need to be 
better protected. The Parkinson Pipeline Project is working on a 
Trial Participants Bill of Rights to address this issue.

Linda Herman

----------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn