Print

Print


Mideast Mess Pushes the Stem-Cell Dispute to Back Burner
July 27, 2006

U.S. Jews were ready to take President Bush to the boards over stem-cell
research. And then he went to the boards for Israel.
The same groups that led the fight to get substantial congressional
majorities for federally funded embryonic stem-cell research said the
conflagration in the Middle East, and Bush's unstinting support for Israel
took some of the wind out of their plans to fight a rearguard action against
his veto.
At least for now.
"Would we go to the boards? Last week, I would have said yes; this week, I
don't know," said June Walker, president of Hadassah, the group that led
Jewish advocacy for federally funded stem-cell research. "We will wait and
resolve this issue until the issue with Israel is resolved. But will our
basic support for stem-cell research change? No."
Hadassah's lobbying, which relied in part on Israeli research in the area,
was considered critical in turning around Sen. Bill Frist (R-Tenn.), the
majority leader and physician who has otherwise stood solidly by Bush.
Hadassah's annual convention this week in Nashville is, in part, a salute to
Frist for bringing the legislation to the Senate floor.
The bill would have extended federal funding to research using embryos that
were slated to be discarded by fertility clinics, and would not have
cultivated embryos specifically for research. Opponents point out that
surplus embryos have been "adopted," and Bush surrounded himself with the
offspring of such experiments when he announced the veto. However, such
adoptions are very rare.
Before Hezbollah launched its attack on Israel on July 12, it had been
anticipated that Bush's decision to exercise his first veto in his 51/2
years as president would stir Jewish community outrage. He vetoed the bill
on July 19; an attempt on the same day in the U.S. House of Representatives
to override the veto with a two-thirds majority failed.
Jewish groups were set to back Democratic efforts to introduce a new bill
and keep the issue alive for November midterm congressional elections, when
Bush's opposition to embryonic stem-cell research is expected to hurt
Republicans. The research has broad public backing.
Now, however, there was a sense that the community would not attack the
issue full force.
"We still care and still work on other issues" besides Israel, said Steve
Gutow, the president of the Jewish Council for Public Affairs, the umbrella
body for community relations councils. "Still, it's a matter of how much
time and energy we have."
The Scientific Potential
There is little sympathy in Jewish thought for the conservative Christian
view that embryonic stem cells represent human life; instead, most streams
of Judaism embrace the scientific potential that such research has in curing
degenerative conditions.
"Jewish tradition places great value upon human life and its preservation,"
the Orthodox Union, a group otherwise noted for warm relations with the
White House, said in a statement supporting last week's 63-37 vote in the
Senate. "Judaism does not accord embryonic cells outside the womb the full
status of humanhood and its attendant protections."
However, Bush's willingness to stem international calls for an immediate
cease-fire in order to give Israel time to incapacitate Hezbollah in Lebanon
meant the community would likely keep a lower profile for now, according to
Gutow.
"It won't lessen the fact that the Jewish community is united on this
issue," he stressed. "But when Israel is threatened, it becomes front and
center."
Bush's Jewish opponents even conceded that Israel is likely to trump the
stem-cell issue for now.
"The first concern of the Jewish community now is and should be Israel,"
said Ira Forman, executive director of the National Jewish Democratic
Council.
That frustrated congressional Democrats, who have relied on Jewish community
lobbying to get this far with the issue.
"We can walk and chew gum at the same time," said Gutow. "But when you see
images of Israelis suffering every day, the community will be focused on
that."
Hadassah, for its part, did not hold back in expressing its fury at the Bush
veto.
"With one stroke of the pen, the president has dismissed the will of the
American people," Walker said in a statement released on July 19.
She called the veto "immoral," and added: "It is a shame for all those who
are suffering from diseases whose treatment and cure is within our reach
that the president places greater value on safeguarding 'potential life'
than he does on safeguarding the lives of those who are living in the here
and now."
The O.U.'s Nathan Diament said that he preferred to regard the veto as a
"glass-half-full" situation, noting that the president had instructed the
National Institutes of Health to exhaustively study non-embryonic stem-cell
research. There is a scientific consensus that non-embryonic stem cells do
not have the same medical potential.
Diament said that Bush also deserves some credit for ignoring more extreme
voices that call for an outright ban. "Some folks in Congress would outlaw
embryonic stem-cell research period, privately or publicly funded. He has a
principled position; we disagree with it."
Matt Brooks, the executive director of the Republican Jewish Coalition,
bemoaned what he said was a misperception in the Jewish community that the
ban killed embryonic stem-cell research outright. "This doesn't ban or
prohibit research on stem cells, it bans federal funds for research," he
said, adding that Bush was the first president to fund any embryonic
stem-cell research, allowing financing for stem-cell lines that had already
been started.
However, countered Jewish experts who have been advocating for further
funding, those lines have long been dismissed as tainted.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn