Print

Print


What think you of this? Ray

Sick to Death of Bush
Terry J. Allen

Trust me, George Bush says, perched on the remains of Geneva Conventions,
the Constitution and habeas corpus.
From this moral high ground, the United States is assuring the world that a
new facility for researching a horror shop of weaponized infectious diseases
will be used purely for defensive purposes.

The National Biodefense Analysis and Countermeasures Center's (NBACC) $128
million, 160,000-square-foot facility is under construction at Fort Detrick,
Md. There, the United States has already weaponized more than a dozen
diseases-including anthrax, plague, botulism and ebola-and bioengineered
war-friendly "improvements." Scientists are also using DNA-synthesizing
techniques to fabricate genetically altered or man-made viruses, and to
study the feasibility of creating germ weapons targeting particular
ethnicities.
"De facto, we are going to make biowarfare pathogens at NBACC in order to
study them," Penrose Albright, former assistant Homeland Security secretary
for science and technology, told the Washington Post.
The 1972 Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention made it illegal under
international and U.S. law to make or stockpile bacteriological or viral
organisms for use as weapons. The United States is exploiting a loophole:
The treaty allows nations to develop small amounts of biological warfare
agents for defensive research.
That, according to a NBACC Power Point presentation, briefly posted on the
Internet and quickly removed, is what the Fort Detrick lab does-in secret
and without meaningful monitoring. The profound secrecy that surrounds the
project, as well as CIA and intelligence involvement, raises alarms; these
are ratcheted up to red alert in light of the Bush administration's track
record of violating international treaties and lying to the public. And then
there is Congress' history of defining "oversight" as a failure to notice
rather than a duty to oversee.
According to the Department of Defense, the secrecy surrounding the Fort
Detrick expansion is necessary for national security. The interests of the
public, administration officials argue (as they did to defend NSA spying),
would be compromised by legislative and judicial meddling-a.k.a. the
constitutionally mandated balance of powers.
Odds are the Fort Detrick research exceeds the purely defensive, rendering
the CBW treaty as quaint as the Geneva Conventions barring torture. But even
if the research conformed to law, what nation would believe that the United
States abides by treaty obligations that limit its "war on terror"?
The possibilities for disaster are plentiful. By undermining the treaty, the
United States greenlights other nations and groups to similarly "defend"
themselves. And compared with making and delivering nukes, creating and
distributing biowarfare agents is dead simple. A competent scientist with a
good lab can cook up enough to sicken and kill thousands, perhaps millions.
Second, the lesson taught by recent dealings with Iran and North Korea is
that possession of weapons of mass destruction tends to inoculate against
U.S. attack. Secret expansion of U.S. bioterrorism research-without
monitoring through the CBW treaty-could spark a bioarms race.
And then there is the risk of accident. On its Web site, the National
Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), a lead government
agency on bioterrorism, asks: "Has there ever been an accident at a BSL-3 or
BSL-4 facility?" (Bio Safety Level-4 labs hold the most dangerous infectious
agents.)
NIAD cheerily answers: "No," although "Rare accidents such as needlesticks
may cause exposure of laboratory staff," but not "to other workers or to the
community."
But according to the Council for Responsible Genetics, "mistakes happen."
Fort Detrick and other Level-3 and -4 facilities have had a number of
accidents, including the loss of ebola and anthrax samples; exposure of
workers to anthrax; a three hour power failure that compromised containment
and led workers (you're going to love this) to seal the windows with duct
tape; a leaking test chamber that infected workers with tuberculosis; a
researcher who contracted the ebola-like sabia virus and exposed 75 other
workers; and two researchers infected with HIV from defective gloves. And,
last but not least, don't forget that the anthrax spores used in the
September 2001 mail attacks traced back to Fort Detrick.
NIAD is equally noncommittal about the safety of shipping bio agents to and
from labs: "There are specific Government regulations for transportation of
infectious materials. Infectious materials are safely transported worldwide
on a daily basis under these regulations." Feel better? Perhaps you didn't
hear that in 2003 a package containing West Nile virus samples exploded and
exposed workers at the Columbus airport.
And then there is the insanity of trusting critical scientific decisions to
an administration that gives equal weight to the theory of evolution and the
fable of creationism, that undermines stem cell research by confusing a
zygote with an infant, and that is waiting until it has to govern in scuba
gear before acknowledging global warming.
Trust me, indeed.
Contact Terry J. Allen at [log in to unmask]
Thanks to In These Times

----------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn