Print

Print


That may be true - but the controversy has to do with using embryos, not the
cells of a dead fetus.
------------
Mary Ann (CG Jamie 66/26 with PD)
www.bentwillowfarm.org

>> >From what I've read, those cell lines were developed from *2* fetuses,
>> > both
>>
>> of which had been aborted - neither of which had been destroyed to
>> construct those cell lines. Since these cells continue to grow there is
>> no
>> need to harvest further diploid cells.
>
>
> looks like fetal cells have been used since the 1930s...
> http://www.ascb.org/index.cfm?navid=121&id=1820&tcode=nws3
>
> Maryse
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to:
> mailto:[log in to unmask]
> In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.407 / Virus Database: 268.12.10/459 - Release Date: 9/29/2006
>
>



--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.407 / Virus Database: 268.12.10/459 - Release Date: 9/29/2006

----------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn