Print

Print


From Reuters this afternoon.
Tony Mazzaschi
AAMC
Official faults Bush stem cell funding limits
Fri Jan 19, 2007 4:24 PM ET
By Will Dunham
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A senior U.S. National Institutes of Health
official said on Friday President George W. Bush's limits on federal
funding for human embryonic stem cell research have blocked potential
medical breakthroughs.
The comments by Story Landis, director of the NIH's National Institute
of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, came as supporters of a bill to
lift Bush's restrictions make a push for Senate passage in the coming
weeks.
Bush used the only veto of his presidency last July to reject an
identical bill and has promised another veto.
Democrats who seized control of Congress in November elections have made
its passage a high priority. It cleared the House of Representatives on
January 11 by a vote of 253-174, short of the two-thirds majority needed
to override a veto.
Democratic Sen. Edward Kennedy of Massachusetts asked Landis during a
Senate hearing to assess the impact of Bush's restrictions, imposed in
August 2001.
 "We are missing out on possible breakthroughs," Landis responded.
Advocates of such research call it the best hope for potential cures for
ailments such as Alzheimer's disease, diabetes, Parkinson's disease and
spinal cord injuries. But because such research requires destruction of
days-old embryos, opponents call it immoral.
Landis said there is a "compelling need to pursue both embryonic and
non-embryonic stem cell research," and no one can predict which might
lead to cures.
"Therefore, NIH should support research on stem cells from both
embryonic and other sources," Landis said.
'ALL AVENUES'
"Science works best when scientists can pursue all avenues of research,"
Landis said. "If the cure for Parkinson's disease or juvenile diabetes
lay behind one of four doors, wouldn't you want the option to open all
four doors at once instead of one door?"
Stem cells are a kind of master cell for the body, capable of growing
into various tissue and cell types. Those taken from days-old embryos
are especially malleable but "adult" stem cells found in babies and
adults also have shown promise.
Many scientists hope to exploit the unique qualities of these cells to
repair tissue damaged by disease or injury.
Two stem cell researchers and Lauren Stanford, a diabetic 15-year-old
Massachusetts girl, pleaded with the senators to pass the bill. No
witnesses opposing it were called.
Some Republican senators against the measure emphasized their support
for "adult" stem cell research not requiring embryo destruction.
"Let's make sure we understand the dividing line," said Sen. Tom Coburn
of Oklahoma, a doctor who has delivered 4,000 babies. "Some of us very
earnestly believe life begins at conception.
"I can tell you that you're going to get a veto," Coburn told the bill's
supporters.
Kennedy said he expected the Senate to consider the bill in February and
appealed to Bush to "re-examine his conscience."
Utah Republican Sen. Orrin Hatch, who opposes abortion but supports
embryonic stem cell research, held up a pair of handcuffs from "one of
my Secret Service buddies" to make the point that Bush's policy binds
scientists' hands.
Bush's 2001 policy limited federal funding to research on the human
embryonic stem cell colonies, or lines, that existed at that time.
Scientists say many of those roughly 20 lines are deteriorating,
contaminated or obsolete.
The bill would allow federal funding for research involving additional
stem cell lines derived from leftover embryos created at fertility
clinics destined otherwise to be destroyed because they will not be used
to make babies.



_______________________________________________

----------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn