Print

Print


In a message dated 20/01/2007 07:05:46 GMT Standard Time,  [log in to unmask]
writes:

From  Reuters this afternoon.

Tony Mazzaschi
AAMC
Official faults Bush  stem cell funding limits
Fri Jan 19, 2007 4:24 PM ET
By Will  Dunham
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A senior U.S. National Institutes of  Health
official said on Friday President George W. Bush's limits on  federal
funding for human embryonic stem cell research have blocked  potential
medical breakthroughs.
The comments by Story Landis, director  of the NIH's National Institute
of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, came  as supporters of a bill to
lift Bush's restrictions make a push for Senate  passage in the coming
weeks.
Bush used the only veto of his presidency  last July to reject an
identical bill and has promised another  veto.
Democrats who seized control of Congress in November elections have  made
its passage a high priority. It cleared the House of Representatives  on
January 11 by a vote of 253-174, short of the two-thirds majority  needed
to override a veto.
Democratic Sen. Edward Kennedy of  Massachusetts asked Landis during a
Senate hearing to assess the impact of  Bush's restrictions, imposed in
August 2001.
"We are missing out on  possible breakthroughs," Landis responded.
Advocates of such research call  it the best hope for potential cures for
ailments such as Alzheimer's  disease, diabetes, Parkinson's disease and
spinal cord injuries. But  because such research requires destruction of
days-old embryos, opponents  call it immoral.
Landis said there is a "compelling need to pursue both  embryonic and
non-embryonic stem cell research," and no one can predict  which might
lead to cures.
"Therefore, NIH should support research on  stem cells from both
embryonic and other sources," Landis said.
'ALL  AVENUES'
"Science works best when scientists can pursue all avenues of  research,"
Landis said. "If the cure for Parkinson's disease or juvenile  diabetes
lay behind one of four doors, wouldn't you want the option to open  all
four doors at once instead of one door?"
Stem cells are a kind of  master cell for the body, capable of growing
into various tissue and cell  types. Those taken from days-old embryos
are especially malleable but  "adult" stem cells found in babies and
adults also have shown  promise.
Many scientists hope to exploit the unique qualities of these  cells to
repair tissue damaged by disease or injury.
Two stem cell  researchers and Lauren Stanford, a diabetic 15-year-old
Massachusetts girl,  pleaded with the senators to pass the bill. No
witnesses opposing it were  called.
Some Republican senators against the measure emphasized their  support
for "adult" stem cell research not requiring embryo  destruction.
"Let's make sure we understand the dividing line," said Sen.  Tom Coburn
of Oklahoma, a doctor who has delivered 4,000 babies. "Some of  us very
earnestly believe life begins at conception.
"I can tell you  that you're going to get a veto," Coburn told the  bill's
supporters.
Kennedy said he expected the Senate to consider the  bill in February and
appealed to Bush to "re-examine his  conscience."
Utah Republican Sen. Orrin Hatch, who opposes abortion but  supports
embryonic stem cell research, held up a pair of handcuffs from  "one of
my Secret Service buddies" to make the point that Bush's policy  binds
scientists' hands.
Bush's 2001 policy limited federal funding to  research on the human
embryonic stem cell colonies, or lines, that existed  at that time.
Scientists say many of those roughly 20 lines are  deteriorating,
contaminated or obsolete.
The bill would allow federal  funding for research involving additional
stem cell lines derived from  leftover embryos created at fertility
clinics destined otherwise to be  destroyed because they will not be used
to make  babies.



_______________________________________________

----------------------------------------------------------------------
To  sign-off Parkinsn send a message to:  mailto:[log in to unmask]
In the body of the message put:  signoff parkinsn



Time to change the selection procedure for politicians to include general
knowledge and intelligence tests ?
  Or go on selecting on the basic of charisma and influence, the  wonder why
you got an ass ?  (I'm not getting at America  here,  England does it too.)

This is done for many jobs of lesser importance

----------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn