Print

Print


Also see (and you can respond to )Michael Kinsley's blog on 
Zerhouni's testimony at:

http://time-
blog.com/swampland/2007/03/seriously_underplayed_story_of.html

Seriously Underplayed Story of the Day
Michael Kinsley

"If I may interrupt the very enjoyable festival of reading other 
people's email for a moment, there was a remarkably under-reported 
development yesterday that demonstrates, I think, President Bush's 
loss of authority in the past few months. Elias Zerhouni, the head of 
the National Institutes of Health, testified to a Senate committee 
that he favors a lifting of Bush's limit on stem cell research. It 
leaves us fighting disease (and foreign competition) "with one hand 
tied behind our back," Zerhouni said. Clearly prepared to say what he 
said, Zerhouni offered a vivid metaphor: he called stem cells 
the "software of life."

This story did not seem to make the paper editions of either the New 
York Times or the Washington Post. (The Wall Street Journal had a 
very short blurb on page one and no longer story.) All the papers had 
it on-line, of course. But isn't this a pretty big deal? Bush has 
used his veto only once: to kill a bill that would have lifted the 
near-ban on federally funded stem cell research that he imposed in 
2001. He feels strongly about it, apparently. Zerhouni, like the US 
Attorneys, serves at the pleasure of the president. And the president 
cannot be pleased. Either Zerhouni is confident that Bush won't fire 
him, or he doesn't care.

Zerhouni's strong endorsement of embryonic stem cell research--and 
especially his emphasis on urgency--puts the lie to several 
preposterous defenses of the Bush restriction: 1) that it isn't 
really a ban because it only applies to federally funded research 
(the terms of the restriction make it almost impossible, or at least 
extremely and pointlessly costly, to do privately funded stem cell 
research if you also accept federal funding for other research, as 
all major medical research facilities do); 2) that adult stem cells 
are just as promising (they're not); and so on.

I should add that I have an interest here: a malady (Parkinson's) for 
which stem cells are especially promising. One of the most ridiculous 
things sometimes suggested by the other side in this dispute is that 
advocates of embryonic stem cell research are motivated more by a 
desire to slaughter embryos than by hope for what might come from the 
research. Let me assure them that the interest in the research is 
pretty intense and definitely sincere."

----------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn