Let's not take a face value whatever some lawyer may advise some corporation to write on the bottom of a text. There are laws , regulations, and institutions allowing reproduction of various sorts. Courseware is not plagiarism (in fact, it is gov't regulated); neither is making a single photocopy for scholarly purposes, nor quoting a short passage from a longer text (rule of thumb: under 100 words, I think). Rick At 06:32 PM 22/05/2007 -0400, you wrote: >Indeed. > >Natasha > >MICHAEL RYAN wrote: > >>Natasha: If I may, were you citing from the book? This does open a can >>of worms, as even the reproduction of the citation itself, that forbids >>reproduction, must in itself be forbidden; though it is no doubt itself a >>reproduction of a public law, regulation or associated document. >> Thus, the copyright symbol is itself, copyrighted. >> What interesting times. >> >> Michael J. Ryan >> >>Natasha Artemeva <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> >>This discussion has prompted me to start paying attention to various >>copyright statements. >>For example, recently published fiction books include the following >>statement: >> >>"No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any electronic >>or mechanical means, >>including information storage and retrieval systems, without permission >>in writing from the publisher, >>except by a reviewer, who may quote brief passages in a review." >> >>Now, does it mean that one cannot use a quote as an epigraph without the >>publisher's permission? >>What about students who study the book at school? Should they request >>permission to quote? >> >>Natasha -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- To leave the list, send a SIGNOFF CASLL command to [log in to unmask] or, if you experience difficulties, write to Russ Hunt at [log in to unmask] For the list archives and information about the organization, its newsletter, and the annual conference, go to http://www.stu.ca/inkshed/ -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-