Print

Print


Early Theatre will be mailed out to subscribers in June.  If you haven't yet renewed your subscription, or want to establish a subscription, I hope the following table of contents for this next issue will encourage you to do so.

Our website, www.earlytheatre.ca , has information on how to subscribe by contacting our publisher, CRRS Publications. People who want to write book reviews should contact our book review editor, Roberta Barker (Dalhousie); and writers of articles and notes for upcoming issues should contact the editor, Helen Ostovich (McMaster).  Email addresses are available online on the webpage.  All issues are available online by subscription through ITER; your subscription includes full access to articles in the REED Newsletter, 1976-1997.

ARTICLES

Children, Costume, and Identity in the Chester Midsummer Show
    Susannah Crowder       

ABSTRACT
This essay focuses on the performances of children in late medieval and early modern Chester, using questions about gender identity and fashion to unpack the intricate social meanings of their representations in the Chester Midsummer Show. Roles for children in the Show changed drastically in the decades before and after 1600, when depictions of boys in performance shifted from representing them as uncivilized and outside the social order to imagining them as a symbolic merchant ‘nobility’. Earlier roles, such as the ‘naked boys’ who attacked a dragon, slowly gave way to luxuriously dressed ‘lords’ who rode for each guild. Unlike the naked boys, who were chosen on the basis of talent and/or specific skills, evidence reveals that the lords were played by the sons of prominent local officials. Given the context of historical unrest in Chester, these familial connections suggest that the desire for imagery of the ‘insider’ came to surpass that for the ‘outsider’. By the seventeenth century, the body of the child no longer represented a sexual and societal blank slate, but instead recreated the social order of the civic elites through aristocratic clothing that drew on sumptuary law to safely express social distinction, social aspiration, and legitimized local authority.


The Reasons of Misrule Revisited: Evangelical Appropriations of Carnival in Tudor Revels
    Robert Hornback            
ABSTRACT
The argument here synthesizes an evangelical strategy statement, costume inventories and performance records, a treatise by Martin Bucer, studies of revels at the inns of court, and descriptions of Edwardian Lord of Misrule George Ferrers by an ambassador and a diarist to demonstrate that Tudor occurrences of such Lords emerged and appeared most frequently at court, colleges, and the inns under the zealously iconoclastic influence of Thomas Cromwell and Edward VI. Evidence in fact reveals a marked anti-papist polemical focus in misrule of the Reformation era, belying stubborn, anachronistic applications of a proto-puritan sobriety to the often raucous entertainments of early evangelicals. Consistent with these findings, much evidence reflects a crackdown on misrule under Mary I. Such an examination ultimately complicates our understanding of when, how, and why many puritans subsequently came to reject misrule and laughter alike.


The Work of Elizabethan Plotters and 2 The Seven Deadly Sins
    Andrew Gurr       
   
    ABSTRACT
Little attention has been paid to the 'plotter', the men who drew up the plots for early companies, and the terms of their work. A re-examination of the evidence suggests a number of fresh considerations. In particular, David Kathman's theory that the plot for 2 THE SEVEN DEADLY SINS was prepared for the Chamberlain's Men in 1597-98 is called in question, as is the idea that boy players were routinely apprenticed to their masters in the same way as the handicraft apprentices.


Mary Frith at the Fortune
    Mark Hutchings      
     
ABSTRACT
Much ink has been spilt on the significance of the representation of gender and gender politics in The Roaring Girl (1611), Middleton and Dekker’s play about Mary Frith, a figure well known to playgoers at the Fortune playhouse and beyond. Yet scholars have paid surprisingly little attention to the evidence that Frith herself attended, and participated in, the Prince Henry’s Men play. Whatever the nature of this ‘role’ (if it was such), arguably it is central to the issues critics have aired, and raises important questions about the play’s reception in 1611. This essay examines the surviving evidence of this tantalisingly suggestive episode, speculates about its precise circumstances, and explores its implications for our understanding of The Roaring Girl in performance. It will be proposed that whatever textual strategies the playwrights used in the quarto published in 1611 to account for Frith’s appearance, Frith was unlikely to have been a wholly comfortable collaborator. Indeed, to those well-documented accounts of Frith’s rejection of authority may be added this intervention at the Fortune, which represents a specific act of resistance to the playhouse’s attempt to contain and redefine her.  Thus it is Mary Frith, rather than the actor playing ‘Moll Cutpurse’, who in taking to the stage plays out current critical concerns.


The Red Lion and the White Horse: Inns used by Patronized Performers in Norwich, 1583-1624
    Jennifer Roberts-Smith       
ABSTRACT
Two Norwich inns, the Red Lion and the White Horse, are known to have been used by patronized performers between 1583 and 1624. The non-theatrical documentary and material records presented here elucidate the inns’ locations, functions, and dimensions; ownership, status in the community, and relationship to the city government; popularity as performance venues; and fates in later centuries. At their heights, the inns were respectable, lucrative, reliable venues, well-managed, well-appointed, and individually stable for decades. They represent what was likely a thriving and long-lasting entertainment industry, supported by city government but operating outside of official civic auspices.


BOOK REVIEWS

Jonathan Burton. Traffic and Turning: Islam and English Drama, 1579-1624. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 2005.
    Reviewed by Matthew Dimmock

Celia R. Daileader. Racism, Misogyny, and the Othello Myth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
    Reviewed by Virginia Mason Vaughan

Julie Hankey (ed). Shakespeare in Production: Othello. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
    Reviewed by Louise Denmead

Lucy Munro. Children of the Queen’s Revels: A Jacobean Theatre Repertory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
    Reviewed by David Nicol

Chester N. Scoville. Saints and the Audience in Middle English Biblical Drama. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2004.
    Reviewed by Katharine Goodland

James Shapiro. A Year in the Life of William Shakespeare: 1599. New York: HarperCollins, 2005.
    Reviewed by Sister Lucia Treanor

Frances A. Shirley (ed). Shakespeare in Production: Troilus and Cressida. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
    Reviewed by Peter Hyland

Marta Straznicky. Privacy, Playreading, and Women’s Closet Drama, 1550-1700. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
    Reviewed by Yvonne Bruce

Garret A. Sullivan, Jr. Memory and Forgetting in English Renaissance Drama: Shakespeare, Marlowe, Webster. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
     Reviewed by Chris Ivic

Judith Weil. Service and Dependency in Shakespeare’s Plays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
    Reviewed by Linda Anderson

Richard Wilson. Secret Shakespeare: Studies in Theatre, Religion and Resistance. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press, 2004.
    Reviewed by Ian McAdam