NINA STOOD UP FOR ALL OF US to fight ban on ESCR in Texas: Being kept in the dark Legislature: Hearings that go late into night cut down on witnesses 12:00 AM CDT on Monday, May 7, 2007 By EMILY RAMSHAW / The Dallas Morning News [log in to unmask] AUSTIN - For a person with Parkinson's disease, the trip itself was grueling - a 160-mile drive to Austin to protest a bill banning state funding of stem cell research before a House committee. Heather Burcham, a stage 4 cervical cancer patient, waited and waited on Feb. 19 to speak in favor of mandatory human papilloma virus vaccinations. Finally, after having been told for three hours that she would be the next to speak, she gave up and left. But once Nina Brown of suburban Houston got to the Capitol, she had to wait about 10 hours for the State Affairs meeting to start, and about four more to testify. By that point - about 2 a.m. - her motor skills were so far gone she had to be lifted to the podium to speak. "I'm so passionately involved with this issue that I was willing to risk my health to be there," said Mrs. Brown, who, despite a two-decade battle with the debilitating disease, stayed at the meeting until it adjourned - at 5:21 a.m. "I don't think I've ever been up that late. For most people, how can they stay?" Critics of the Legislature's committee system say lawmakers are practicing democracy after dark, delaying votes on hot issues until the last, late-night minute, and dragging out favorable testimony to silence opposition. The committee process - where bills are first heard, debated and amended - is so unpredictable that the process at the very least raises questions of equal access in some observers' minds. Who other than a paid lobbyist can afford to sit at the Capitol all day and night, waiting for a loosely scheduled meeting to begin? Who other than Austin insiders will know when a bill will be taken out of order or voted on unexpectedly? And how many people with children, day jobs or serious health conditions can drive across the state on short notice and wait until 4 a.m. to testify? Committee chairs call this criticism preposterous. They agree the hearings and unpredictable schedules can be inconvenient - they don't like to be up until 5:20 a.m., either - but they say it's simply the nature of the legislative beast. Committee members work around the schedules of the full House and Senate, and they can't control when those meetings begin or end. They're committed to taking testimony from everyone who wants to speak, which is why many of the meetings run on ... and on. And the late-night testimony isn't reserved for people on the losing side of a bill, they say - it's generally first-come, first-served. Keeping late hours Almost every committee can expect a few late-night meetings while the Legislature is in session. The Senate Criminal Justice Committee spent close to 10 hours on the Texas Youth Commission in March. A House Human Services committee meeting on Child Protective Services in February lasted more than 11 hours. And the House Natural Resources Committee took testimony on reservoirs one night last month until 3:20 a.m. But the House State Affairs Committee - the clearinghouse for many of the Legislature's hotly contested bills, including those on abortion rights and stem cell research - consistently wins the award for the longest and latest meetings. So far this session, the panel has had six meetings run past midnight and four meetings that lasted more than 10 hours. A March hearing on residential construction rules lasted close to 12 hours, ending at 3:54 a.m. An 11-hour meeting on abortion bills this month adjourned at 4:15 a.m. And a nearly eight-hour stem cell hearing - the one Mrs. Brown attended - ran until 5:21 a.m. Lawmakers said they had little choice. The meeting began around 8 a.m., recessed about 9 a.m. when the full House met and didn't reconvene until almost 11 p.m. Chairman David Swinford had to choose who would testify first: opponents and advocates of state funded stem cell research or exhausted elementary-age children waiting to speak about religious freedom in school. The school bill, a holdover from the previous week, was heard first - what Mr. Swinford, R-Dumas, has called a "grandfather decision" - even though it wasn't originally on the committee docket. Mrs. Brown and other stem cell research advocates have accused Mr. Swinford of purposely pulling the school item onto the agenda and allowing the kids to speak with no time limit to delay stem cell testimony. "It had to be intentional. I can't understand why [the kids] would be brought in at that time, when they could've been brought in on any other day," said Mrs. Brown, 65, the vice president for the Texas Parkinson's Action Network. "It was a blatant political move to prevent those in attendance from having a fair hearing." Mr. Swinford vehemently denies that. Although he had hoped the meeting would start earlier, he said, the State Affairs Committee prides itself on letting everyone who's made the effort to attend speak without a time limit. This applies to children as well. "My policy is, if they come, they will be heard," Mr. Swinford said. And, he said, as often as people complain about the length of a hearing, they thank committee members for being so thorough. At a 2005 hearing on a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage, the committee took testimony from 998 people, Mr. Swinford said, starting at 2 p.m. and ending at 9:30 the next morning. Even though opponents of the gay marriage ban knew committee members had decided against them, he said, they still thanked them for allowing everyone to speak. Time limits Opponents say they have no problem with allowing everyone to testify. They just want reasonable time limits for testimony, weekend meetings on the most controversial issues and special consideration for people with special circumstances. Like 31-year-old Heather Burcham, who, with stage 4 cervical cancer, made the arduous trek from Houston in February for a House Public Health hearing about mandatory human papilloma vaccinations for Texas schoolgirls. When the meeting started at 7 p.m., lawmakers, who overwhelmingly favored a bill to block Gov. Rick Perry's executive order for the vaccines, knew Ms. Burcham was in the audience. Mr. Perry's office had arranged a media briefing with her that morning, and TV cameras in the hearing room were trained on her. But after three hours of being told she was next in line to speak - and multiple requests from Mr. Perry's staffers that she be taken out of order - Ms. Burcham still hadn't been called to testify. At 10 p.m., doubled over in pain and hardly able to keep her eyes open, Ms. Burcham left without testifying. James Cooley, a spokesman for Public Health chairman Dianne Delisi, said the committee's longstanding tradition is to allow expert witnesses invited by the bill's author to testify first. He said once lawmakers learned of Ms. Burcham's condition, she was moved up the list to follow the expert witnesses - but those individuals testified for close to three hours. "There was a request, and she was moved up," Mr. Cooley said. "She was called just a few minutes after she left." Of late, Mr. Cooley said, the committee has begun using a timer to keep testimony to a reasonable length. And at a recent hearing on when hospitals should be able to remove a terminal patient's care, he said, a few mothers with young kids in the audience were moved up to speak before anyone else. That meeting, on April 25, ran 10 hours, until after 5 a.m. The committee meetings are generally a lost cause for people who live far away or work regular, 9-to-5 jobs, said Tom "Smitty" Smith, Texas director of the advocacy group Public Citizen. "They can't participate in democracy with that kind of schedule," he said. But late meetings are no walk in the park for lobbyists either. Mr. Smith left a 2001 hearing at 5:20 a.m., he said, and returned to the same hearing room three hours later to find a lobbyist asleep in his suit on the floor. "At some point, you have to question whether it's really designed to drive away witnesses," he said. Staff writer Amy Rosen contributed to this report. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask] In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn