Hi all I strongly agree with Anthony, Natasha and Tania re informing readers about the discipline of Writing Studies. I further suggest mentioning both the Inkshed conference and the CATTW conference. Both emphasize scholarship and research. We have a scholarship and research basis to what we do and that should be emphasized. Thanks for all your work on this. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tania Smith" <[log in to unmask]> To: <[log in to unmask]> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2008 10:45 PM Subject: Re: Marche response: a draft beginning > Wow, what a thoughtful and gracious response we are drafting. > I strongly agree with Anthony and Natasha about informing readers that > there is a discipline of Writing Studies and a significant body of > knowledge represented by journals, conferences, departments, etc. > I think the average teacher and administrator at most postsecondary > institutions in Canada (especially at institutions that do not have highly > visible academic majors/minors in the area) may still be unaware that > "Writing" can be more than "service" to students and teachers at their own > institution. They need to know that Writing is a discipline that concerns > itself with writing in public and professional settings (not just > students' academic writing), and that Canadian associations of scholars > have long been involved in creating knowledge, providing graduate > instruction in our field, and training advanced practitioners of written > communication. Spreading this knowledge might make life a little easier > for those of us who are trying to maintain and develop programs with > visible strengths in the areas of writing and/or rhetoric. > By naming "Writing studies" in its theme, our upcoming CATTW conference > seems to be doing an impressive job of informing people of the growing > area of Writing Studies and its relationship to "rhetoric, composition, > discourse analysis, cognitive psychology, writing across the curriculum > and writing in the disciplines, linguistics, and English studies." Inkshed > can also do a great service to its members by making at least a small note > of this in the response to the UA article. > Tania Smith > > > > Anthony Paré wrote: >> Hi Susan, >> Thanks for crafting this response. I think it has the right tone and >> content to counter Marche's well-meaning but blinkered view. University >> Affairs isn't the place to engage in a full-length argument, and what >> you've said will give readers pause and something to think about while >> they're pausing. Aside from the few typos you'll catch in editing, and a >> conclusion that might invite more dialogue, I think the piece is ready. >> But I wonder if you might mention some of the associations, journals, >> conferences, and university departments dedicated to the study and >> teaching of writing in Canada and the States. We do seem to remain below >> the radar. And how would you like to indicate authorship? As CASLL? On >> behalf of CASLL? >> Anthony >> Anthony Paré Centre for the Study and Teaching of Writing >> Integrated Studies in Education >> Editor, McGill Journal of Education (http://mje.mcgill.ca/index) >> McGill University >> 514-398-5600 >> >> ________________________________ >> >> > > -- > Tania S. Smith > Assistant Professor > Faculty of Communication & Culture > University of Calgary > http://www.ucalgary.ca/~smit > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > To leave the list, send a SIGNOFF CASLL command to > [log in to unmask] or, if you experience difficulties, > write to Russ Hunt at [log in to unmask] > > For the list archives and information about the organization, > its newsletter, and the annual conference, go to > http://www.stu.ca/inkshed/ > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- To leave the list, send a SIGNOFF CASLL command to [log in to unmask] or, if you experience difficulties, write to Russ Hunt at [log in to unmask] For the list archives and information about the organization, its newsletter, and the annual conference, go to http://www.stu.ca/inkshed/ -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-