>Subject: Cultural Grammars of Nation, Diaspora and Indigeneity in Canada >X-Mailer: SFUwebmail 2.70 >Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 14:32:26 -0700 >Reply-To: [log in to unmask] >To: [log in to unmask] >From: [log in to unmask] > > >Call for Papers: > >Cultural Grammars of Nation, Diaspora and Indigeneity in Canada > >Edited by Melina Baum Singer, Christine Kim, and Sophie McCall > >Over the past couple of decades, the terms of critical debate that >have animated Canadian cultural and literary studies—such as race, >nation, difference, culture—have shifted in significant ways. The >death of the nation, so often prophesied, with varying degrees of >optimism, fear and ambivalence, continues to shape the language of >Canadian cultural and literary studies. In this collection we propose >to analyse the larger conceptual shifts that have occurred in >response to national and post-national arguments. Discourses of >postcoloniality have been supplemented, and in many cases, even >largely replaced by the paradigms of diaspora, indigeneity, >globalization, and transnationalism, perhaps suggesting that the >broader project of decolonization requires multiple kinds of tools >and strategies. At the same time, each of these theoretical >frameworks has also undergone a series of transformations that bear >investigating. Diaspora studies, for example, has moved away from its >initial affiliation with Jews and Jewish experiences and has largely >become synonymous with critical race theory. First Nations studies >has long had a troubled relationship with postcolonial studies, since >many practices and policies of colonization are ongoing. Diasporic >and indigenous scholarship is often critical of Canadian national >discourses and the practices of the state, yet both critical streams >maintain certain investments in the language of nations. For >instance, the discourses of sovereignty and nation-to-nation >relations have become key words for Aboriginal writing, while >critical race politics in the 1980s was deeply invested in creating a >place for minorities within the nation. Meanwhile, hybridity as a >critical approach, mobilized to address an increasingly broad set of >questions relating to cultural race politics, is often associated >with transnationalism and the emergence of globalization studies. The >goal of this collection is to take stock of ongoing conversations >about the cultural politics of contemporary Canadian literature and >to consider the cultural grammar for speaking about race and >ethnicity in the current moment. >We are particularly interested in submissions that explore the >following questions: > >How do we understand the ongoing production of diasporas in the >current moment given the displacing work of social, economic, and >political forces that often take the form of social policies, >poverty, and responses to natural disaster? At the same time that >racialized groups seem particularly vulnerable to uprooting forces in >the current moment, this is also a period in which the creative and >critical work of diasporas appears to be flourishing. How do we >understand the relationship between these aspects of diaspora? Are >they as contradictory as they initially appear? > >How do First Nations issues such as land claims and redress for >residential schools speak to diasporic ethics and politics? How might >we think about indigenous and/or diasporic relations to issues of >displacement? To what extent does the turn to sovereignty, which >continues to play an important role in developing a language of >decolonization in First Nations studies, risk eliding urban, mixed- >blood, deterritorialized indigenous subjectivities? What other >conversations between First Nations and diasporas are ongoing or have >been held in the past? > >What might the future of a critical multiculturalism hold, especially >given pressing questions of sovereignty, state, and nation? What are >the implications for discourses of multiculturalism in the face of a >recent proliferation of media commentary that taps into fears of >‘home-grown terrorists’ on the one hand, and celebrates hybridity on >the other? What does the turn to cultural hybridity enable and what >does it obscure? How do discourses of hybridity articulate with >discourses of nation, transnationalism and globalization? And more >broadly, how do we understand this tension between the legal and >cultural discourses of identity? > >Often, ‘postcolonial’ writing is reduced to matters of content and >‘issues’ and questions of form and style overlooked. Yet this shift >from postcolonial to newer or different paradigms underscores the >significance of ‘how’ these conversations unfold. How might we then >foreground questions of the aesthetics of ‘minority’ writing in Canada? > >The editors have a formal offer to publish this collection as part of >the TransCanada series through Wilfrid Laurier University Press. We >welcome submissions about 4000-6000 words in length to be submitted >by August 30, 2008. Requests for information can be sent to Melina >Baum Singer at [log in to unmask], Christine Kim at [log in to unmask] >or Sophie McCall at [log in to unmask] > >We require an electronic version of your paper as well as 3 hard >copies. Please email submissions to any of the editors and mail hard >copies to either Christine Kim or Sophie McCall at: > >Department of English > >Simon Fraser University > >Burnaby, British Columbia > >V5A 1S6 > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- To leave the list, send a SIGNOFF CASLL command to [log in to unmask] or, if you experience difficulties, write to Russ Hunt at [log in to unmask] For the list archives and information about the organization, its newsletter, and the annual conference, go to http://www.stu.ca/inkshed/ -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-