Print

Print


This research is described by Erfelt as "grisly".   I'm wondering what is 
grisly about it.  Ray

Embryonic Stem Cell Research Backers Worry John McCain Will Change View

by Steven Ertelt
LifeNews.com Editor
August 14, 2008

Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- Backers of making taxpayers fund embryonic 
stem cell research are concerned presidential candidate John McCain would 
change his position on the issue if he becomes president. That's exactly 
what pro-life groups hope will happen -- that McCain will see alternatives 
as so successful funding isn't needed.
President Bush has been the pro-life movement's biggest ally in Washington 
on embryonic stem cell research. He has repeatedly vetoed legislation to 
make taxpayer fund the research, which involves the destruction of days-old 
unborn children.
McCain voted for public funding, but Rep. Mike Castle, a Delaware 
Republican, is worried he would also veto the bill should he become 
president.
"Based on his votes in the Senate, the answer to that is yes," he told the 
Hill newspaper about whether he thought McCain would sign it.
"The question becomes: Will the pro-life movement be able to persuade him 
otherwise between now and the election?" Castle asked.
Leading pro-life advocates who have discussed stem cell research with McCain 
say the presidential candidate, who opposes abortion, is very excited about 
the advances in ethical alternatives.
McCain is reportedly surprised by the initial success of iPSCs and the 
concept of direct reprogramming -- turning adult stem cells into an 
embryonic-like state. Thus far, it has been so successful that some 
scientists say it may make embryonic stem cell research unnecessary.
As the science progresses, David O'Steen, the head of the National Right to 
Life Committee, hopes McCain will realize taxpayers don't have to fund 
embryonic stem cell research for patients to get the best scientific 
research possible.
"We'd be hopeful that he'd leave [Bush's] policy in place," O'Steen said, 
though he said McCain's ultimate decision is "an open question."
"I don't think he's ideologically committed" to embryonic stem cell 
research, O'Steen added. "While Barack Obama is ideologically committed to 
it, John McCain has indicated that [embryonic] stem cell research is, in his 
words, 'academic.'"
Should McCain refrain from public funding, it would be a return of sorts to 
his original position against embryonic stem cell research funding, adopted 
before Nancy Reagan lobbied him on the issue in 2005, The Hill indicates.
While McCain supports public funding, he opposes the purposeful creation of 
human embryos for destruction, he supports funding adult stem cell research 
and opposes both forms of human cloning.
That's a contrast to the position pro-abortion presidential candidate Barack 
Obama takes -- as he has said he would use an executive order to mandate 
funding for the grisly research as soon as he takes office.

Sign Up for Free Pro-Life News From LifeNews.com
Daily Pro-Life News Report

Rayilyn Brown
Director AZNPF
Arizona Chapter National Parkinson Foundation
[log in to unmask] 

----------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn