Print

Print


For what it's worth to anyone contemplating fillings, I have very few amalgam fillings any more, and all new ones or replacements are composite.  As I mentioned earlier, all of Laureen's amalgams have been gone for over 15 years--replaced with composite.  She's the PWP, as most of you know.  Interestingly, dentists have always told us that the composite fillings will not last as long as the amalgam.  Yet, none of my composite fillings has ever needed replacing--neither has Laureen's.  Most of my amalgam fillings have.   Whether or not composite fillings will prove to be harmful in the long run, one thing's for sure: The composite fillings look more natural, and they don't leach mercury vapor.  Scott

Scott E. Antes
Northern Arizona University
Department of Anthropology
PO Box 15200
Flagstaff, AZ 86011
________________________________________
From: Parkinson's Information Exchange Network [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of schild.m [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2008 12:55 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Amalgam fillings

> I believe that composite (plastic) fillings are a better replacement than
> metal (e.g., gold) fillings even in chemically-sensitive individuals


That is until someboy finds some toxicity in the composite material. Life is a
dangerous activity which always ends badly
maryse

----------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
In the body of the message put: signoff parkins

----------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn