Print

Print


Medical Controversy - When Does Life Begin?
May 10, 2009 | By Sajid Surve, DOcloseSajid Surve, DO Name: Sajid Surve
Site: http://brainblogger.com

About: Dr. Sajid Surve is a physiatrist, acupuncturist, and osteopath who 
specializes in musculoskeletal medicine and integrative medicine. |

One of the most contested questions in history is a seemingly simple one: 
When does life begin? Different cultures and societies have battled to 
answer this question, and to date no consensus has been reached. Of course, 
the answer to this question has profound ethical, legal, moral, and 
philosophical implications. As the United States debates the merits and 
pitfalls of topics like embryonic stem cell research and abortion, the 
arguments for the beginnings of life have found themselves renewed. Along 
the timeline from preconception through birth and beyond, there are several 
stops where one group or another has drawn a line in the sand and proclaimed 
that life has officially begun. In the interest of providing some clarity on 
this issue, let us examine the rationale behind why these groups picked 
their points. As a reference, a textbook on developmental biology will 
provide some framework.

Preconception
The earliest stopping point is held by many members of the Catholic Church, 
with their proclamation that "every sperm is sacred." The held rationale is 
that every sperm has the possibility to fertilize an egg, become implanted, 
and eventually grow into a human being. Since God's charge is to go forth 
and procreate, any type of hindrance to that process such as the use of 
condoms or birth control pills are interfering with God's plan and therefore 
not allowed.

Conception
The greater religious community generally view the "moment of conception" as 
the standard for when life begins. However, the definition of conception is 
subject to variability. Some take the word conception to actually mean the 
act of ejaculation. Others consider conception to be the process of 
fertilization. Still others consider the fusion of genetic material into a 
new set of chromosomes to be meant by conception. The problem with any of 
these definitions is that the process is not instantaneous. From the time of 
ejaculation, sperm take 7 hours before they become active and able to 
fertilize an egg. Once the sperm meets the egg, a chemical cascade begins 
and the sperm begins to bore its way through the egg, which may take up to 
an hour. Once the sperm actually enters the egg, it's another 12 hours 
before the sperm DNA makes its way to the egg's DNA, and then another 24 
hours for the restructuring and packaging process of new chromosomes. All 
told, the "moment of conception" could take anywhere from 2-3 days to 
complete.

Gastrulation
Another argument that is raised against the "moment of conception" line of 
thinking is the twinning argument. Once the genetic material is completely 
packaged together, a new individual is created. However, for as long as 
12-14 days afterward, the embryo can split into twins or more multiples. 
That process would create more than one individual with identical genetic 
material from the same moment of conception. To account for this 
discrepancy, some argue that life begins at gastrulation, which is when the 
window has closed, the embryo has implanted in the uterus, and is now 
committed to grow into one human being. Supporters of this theory would 
therefore support stem cell research, which harvests embryos that have 
neither the intention nor ability to be implanted into a uterus.

Week 8
The eighth week of pregnancy is a special one, because at this point the 
precursors to all organs have been formed. Philosophers therefore argue that 
with the beginnings of a brain, the fetus now has the ability to think and 
react, and that marks the onset of life. Opponents argue that the 
rudimentary nervous system is not functional at 8 weeks, and the fetus 
cannot process information or move in response to a stimulus, therefore not 
making the fetus alive.

Quickening
Those same groups which argue against the week 8 model suggest that life 
begins with the "quickening," which is when the fetus begins to exhibit 
voluntary movement inside the womb, usually around 14-16 weeks. At this 
point the fetus is able to react to external stimuli, which is held as the 
standard for life.

Week 20
Although the fetus can move at week 14, the movements are little more than 
jerky reflexes. They are not driven by higher cortical functioning. 
Therefore, another school of thought is that life begins at week 20, when 
the thalamus is completely formed. The thalamus is the relay center of the 
brain, and helps to connect the cerebral cortex to the spinal cord and 
peripheral nerves.

Week 25
A sizable contingent would assert that life begins at 25 weeks. The 
rationale for this starting point is based on our definition of death. The 
definition of death is not disputed, and is considered the time when 
electroencephalography (EEG) activity ceases. EEG measures brain activity 
and must demonstrate regular wave patterns to be considered valid. 
Therefore, by this rule the onset of life would be the time when fetal brain 
activity begins to exhibit regular wave patterns, which occurs fairly 
consistently around week 25. Previous to that time, the EEG only shows small 
bursts of activity without sustained firing of neurons.

Birth
Perhaps the second-most frequently held conviction is that life begins at 
the time of child birth. In Jewish Talmudic Law, for example, the writing 
states that once the head of the child is delivered it cannot be touched and 
is granted equal rights to life as the mother. Other religious groups 
maintain that the soul is delivered to the newborn with their first breath 
of air.

Self-consciousness
A minor group of philosophers maintain that the criterion for human life is 
self-consciousness, or self-awareness, which does not occur until well into 
childhood. This group believes that abortion is morally equivalent to 
infanticide, and that both are condonable under certain circumstances. Their 
viewpoint is extreme, and has generally been rejected by mainstream 
ethicists and theologians.

While this accounting is by no means comprehensive, and perhaps 
oversimplifies some concepts for the purpose of clarity, let it serve as a 
starting point for obtaining more information. With debate on this topic 
wide open, and no clear answers in sight, the best hope is to understand all 
viewpoints and draw an informed conclusion as to when life begins.

Reference
Gilbert, Scott F. DevBio, a Companion to Developmental Biology, Eighth 
Edition. Sinauer Associates Inc., March 2006. Chapter 2, subsection 1.

Rayilyn Brown
Director AZNPF
Arizona Chapter National Parkinson Foundation
[log in to unmask] 

----------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn