Print

Print


What is described on page 425 of the Health Care Reform Bill are advanced 
directives.  As a nurse, I believe that it is essential that every patient 
be asked what they wish their code status to be, whether  they have 
identified a medical power of attorney to make decisions for them in the 
event that they cannot speak for themselves and whether they have 
established a 'living will' which will spell out how much they want done, or 
not done, in the event they are critically ill.  It makes perfect sense that 
such a review of information should take place every five years.  Why some 
folks are stating that such a mandate is about 'killing the elderly and 
infirm' I do not understand.

Incidentally, I am a Republican and absolutely disagree with the criticism 
of this portion of the Health Care Reform Bill.
-------
Mary Ann Ryan
www.bentwillowfarm.org


here's an article from the Winstom salem Journal about Foxx's comment. Even 
sadder is some of the comments on the article  -- these people seem to 
believe that  the AARP is actually  plotting with the "liberals" to hasten 
the death of seniors.
The section of the Health Care Reform bill  in question starts on p. 425 --  
''Advance Care Planning Consultation" and would provdie Medicare coverage 
for  counseling and providing information on end of life options -- like 
living wills, hospice care, advance directives  etc.
see: http://docs.house.gov/edlabor/AAHCA-BillText-071409.pdf

articel at:
http://www2.journalnow.com/content/2009/jul/30/foxxs-seniors-put-to-death-comment-on-health-bill-/

Foxx's 'seniors...put to death' comment on health bill raises ire

By Christian Kloc
July 30, 2009
JOURNAL REPORTER
U.S. Rep. Virginia Foxx, R-5th, caused a stir this week with her comments in 
the U.S. House.

During debate over health-care overhaul plans, Foxx said Tuesday that the 
Republican version of the bill "is pro-life because it will not put seniors 
in a position of being put to death by their government."

The statement reflects Foxx's wish to keep the current House health-care 
bill free of tax money for end-of-life counseling and abortion, said her 
spokesman, Aaron Groen.

Foxx's comments echoed the concerns of several high-profile conservatives 
who have said that the current House bill could lead the government to 
encourage euthanasia for ailing seniors.

Bob Garner, a spokesman for AARP North Carolina which is backing the bill, 
dismissed that threat.

Though a provision of the bill offers Medicare coverage for consultation on 
life-sustaining treatments and such end-of-life services as hospice, 
participation in such programs would remain optional, Garner said.

"There's an opportunity, not a requirement, to prepare a living will," he 
said.

A living will allows seniors to tell their family how doctors should handle 
life-threatening situations. Someone may request measures to prolong their 
life or refuse extensive medical treatment, depending on their personal 
wishes.

"The bill does not attempt to dictate in any way what seniors choose to do," 
and the idea that the government could tell seniors how to die is a 
distortion of the plan, Garner said.

Some North Carolina leaders, including Andrew Whalen, the executive director 
of the state's Democratic Party, were frustrated by Foxx's remarks. "I don't 
think that any plan, be it Republican or Democratic, is going to put seniors 
to death," he said.

State leadership should focus on solving the current health-care crisis 
instead of making inflammatory accusations, Whalen said.

"There are a lot of folks that suffer every day that we don't address," 
including seniors, children and families, he said.

This is the second time in the past few months that Foxx has aroused 
controversy on a hot-button political issue. She drew criticism in April for 
saying that the 1998 murder of Matthew Shepard, a gay man in Wyoming, was 
not a hate crime. Two men pleaded guilty to killing him and testified that 
they singled him out because he was gay

Groen said that Foxx, in her comments Tuesday, wants to keep the government 
from making moral judgments on such issues as abortion or euthanasia.

"The great thing that she was pointing out is that the Republican 
alternative (on health care) does neither of those," he said.

■ Christian Kloc can be reached at 727-7270 or at [log in to unmask]

■ The New York Times contributed to this article.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn

----------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn