Print

Print


Timely comments about public opinion and scientists.

Earlier this month, the Pew Research Center and the American Association for 
the Advancement of Science unveiled the latest embarrassing evidence of our 
nation's scientific illiteracy. Only 52 percent of Americans in their survey 
knew why stem cells differ from other kinds of cells; just 46 percent knew 
that atoms are larger than electrons. On a highly contentious issue like 
global warming, meanwhile, the gap between scientists and the public was 
vast: 84 percent of scientists, but just 49 percent of Americans, think 
human emissions are causing global warming.

Scientists are fond of citing statistics such as these in explaining 
conflicts between the public and the scientific community. On politicized 
issues like climate change, embryonic stem cell research, the teaching of 
evolution, and the safety of vaccines, many Americans not only question 
scientific expertise but even feel entitled to discard it completely. The 
reason, many scientists infer, is that the public is just clueless; perhaps 
we wouldn't have these problems if the average citizen were better educated, 
more knowledgeable, better informed.

Yet while scientific illiteracy is nothing to shrug at, the truth is that it's 
only part of a broader problem for which scientists themselves must shoulder 
a significant portion of the responsibility. Decrying ignorance and 
scientific illiteracy, many scientists treat their fellow citizens as empty 
vessels waiting for an infusion of knowledge. That is exactly wrong, and 
exactly why so many people, in turn, see science and scientists as distant, 
inscrutable, aloof, arrogant. Rather than blaming, scientists ought to be 
engaging with the public, trying to personally make their knowledge hit home 
and to instill by example (rather than from a distance) the nature and 
virtues of the scientific mindset - while also encouraging average Americans 
to ask their own questions and have their say. Scientists must make it clear 
that while they don't have all the answers, science is about searching for 
the truth, an imperfect process of doing the best one can with the 
information available, while knowing there is always more to learn - the 
epitome of humility. [More]

Oddly, farmers also are affected by anti-intellectualism on many fronts, as 
Blake Hurst pointed out. It seems to me our commitment to the scientific 
method extends no further than our own prejudices.

Still, it doesn't matter if you are right (or at least more nearly so) if 
you can't persuade anyone else.  This is the hurdle facing our culture for 
many issues.  For various reasons, there appears to be a cafeteria approach 
to knowledge, perhaps grounded in our traditions of egalitarianism and 
democracy.  Choose those facts that fit your world view, deny the rest.

Unfortunately, opinions are not as equal as the political standing of those 
who espouse them.  Nonetheless, as several have said, " Folks are entitled 
to their own opinions, but not their own facts."

It does not help to be discussing Big Issues in a time of economic fear.  I 
think those anxieties bleed over into other areas, despite our best efforts 
to be impartial.

Still, the conclusions drawn by the author above are helpful, I think.  And 
time has a way of eroding all but the truth.
Posted by John Phipps at 6:32 PM

2 comments:
Anonymous said...
Truth win out? Well maybe. Anti-intellectualism is a strong force in some 
humans. It and religious fervor are what brought on the dark ages long ago 
and we may be headed for another dark period. A good book to read on the 
subject is Chris Mooney's; The Republican War on Science. At a time when we 
need science more than ever to solve problems, science is being attacked on 
all fronts. Our ag colleges are starved for funds and the public's 
appreciation of science and agriculture reach new lows. Is it only a matter 
of time before the mobs gather to burn down the library, greenhouse, animal 
barn or climate change research lab? Its happened before
7:42 PM
Anonymous said...
I am also perplexed on the decrease in critical thinking and general 
scientific knowledge. I always thought that as more individuals achieve 
college degrees than in previous years, many of our fear based prejudices of 
the past would slowly erode. At times it seems the opposite is true.
7:51 PM

Rayilyn Brown
Director AZNPF
Arizona Chapter National Parkinson Foundation
[log in to unmask] 

----------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn