 |
 |
I see three culprits (among others, I am sure). The first is the plethora of sources in this digital age, whereby individuals can turn to those sources that reinforce their biases and ignorance, and never encounter the rest. The second is elementary and secondary education, which under our "system" of local control is often dumbed down, or cleansed of "controversial" material, by parents who are victims of the very forces I am describing. And the third is the impact of religion that insists it is an alternative route to truth, even in areas that should be decided by empirical routes (i.e., science). What do others think? -Ken On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 11:22 PM, rayilynlee <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Timely comments about public opinion and scientists. > > Earlier this month, the Pew Research Center and the American Association > for the Advancement of Science unveiled the latest embarrassing evidence of > our nation's scientific illiteracy. Only 52 percent of Americans in their > survey knew why stem cells differ from other kinds of cells; just 46 percent > knew that atoms are larger than electrons. On a highly contentious issue > like global warming, meanwhile, the gap between scientists and the public > was vast: 84 percent of scientists, but just 49 percent of Americans, think > human emissions are causing global warming. > > Scientists are fond of citing statistics such as these in explaining > conflicts between the public and the scientific community. On politicized > issues like climate change, embryonic stem cell research, the teaching of > evolution, and the safety of vaccines, many Americans not only question > scientific expertise but even feel entitled to discard it completely. The > reason, many scientists infer, is that the public is just clueless; perhaps > we wouldn't have these problems if the average citizen were better educated, > more knowledgeable, better informed. > > Yet while scientific illiteracy is nothing to shrug at, the truth is that > it's only part of a broader problem for which scientists themselves must > shoulder a significant portion of the responsibility. Decrying ignorance and > scientific illiteracy, many scientists treat their fellow citizens as empty > vessels waiting for an infusion of knowledge. That is exactly wrong, and > exactly why so many people, in turn, see science and scientists as distant, > inscrutable, aloof, arrogant. Rather than blaming, scientists ought to be > engaging with the public, trying to personally make their knowledge hit home > and to instill by example (rather than from a distance) the nature and > virtues of the scientific mindset - while also encouraging average Americans > to ask their own questions and have their say. Scientists must make it clear > that while they don't have all the answers, science is about searching for > the truth, an imperfect process of doing the best one can with the > information available, while knowing there is always more to learn - the > epitome of humility. [More] > > Oddly, farmers also are affected by anti-intellectualism on many fronts, as > Blake Hurst pointed out. It seems to me our commitment to the scientific > method extends no further than our own prejudices. > > Still, it doesn't matter if you are right (or at least more nearly so) if > you can't persuade anyone else. This is the hurdle facing our culture for > many issues. For various reasons, there appears to be a cafeteria approach > to knowledge, perhaps grounded in our traditions of egalitarianism and > democracy. Choose those facts that fit your world view, deny the rest. > > Unfortunately, opinions are not as equal as the political standing of those > who espouse them. Nonetheless, as several have said, " Folks are entitled > to their own opinions, but not their own facts." > > It does not help to be discussing Big Issues in a time of economic fear. I > think those anxieties bleed over into other areas, despite our best efforts > to be impartial. > > Still, the conclusions drawn by the author above are helpful, I think. And > time has a way of eroding all but the truth. > Posted by John Phipps at 6:32 PM > > 2 comments: > Anonymous said... > Truth win out? Well maybe. Anti-intellectualism is a strong force in some > humans. It and religious fervor are what brought on the dark ages long ago > and we may be headed for another dark period. A good book to read on the > subject is Chris Mooney's; The Republican War on Science. At a time when we > need science more than ever to solve problems, science is being attacked on > all fronts. Our ag colleges are starved for funds and the public's > appreciation of science and agriculture reach new lows. Is it only a matter > of time before the mobs gather to burn down the library, greenhouse, animal > barn or climate change research lab? Its happened before > 7:42 PM > Anonymous said... > I am also perplexed on the decrease in critical thinking and general > scientific knowledge. I always thought that as more individuals achieve > college degrees than in previous years, many of our fear based prejudices of > the past would slowly erode. At times it seems the opposite is true. > 7:51 PM > > Rayilyn Brown > Director AZNPF > Arizona Chapter National Parkinson Foundation > [log in to unmask] > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto: > [log in to unmask] > In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn > -- Ken and Elaine Goodrich 5800 Forest Hills Blvd. Apt. D-103 Columbus, Ohio 43231-2941 614-426-3040 Patriotism means being loyal to your country all the time and to its government when it deserves it. – Mark Twain ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask] In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn