 |
 |
In a message dated 8/28/2009 12:00:14 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, [log in to unmask] writes: There is 1 message totalling 84 lines in this issue. Topics of the day: 1. ROFLMAO ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask] In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 11:01:08 +0200 From: Nic Marais <[log in to unmask]> Subject: Re: ROFLMAO Roll On Floor Laughing My Ass Off ;-) Nic On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 9:37 AM, rayilynlee <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > pls tell me what ROFLMAO means > Rayilyn Brown > Director AZNPF > Arizona Chapter National Parkinson Foundation > [log in to unmask] > > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "Peggy Willocks" <[log in to unmask]> > Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 4:50 AM > To: <[log in to unmask]> > Subject: Re: PARKINSN Digest - 25 Aug 2009 (#2009-282) > > Patti >> I know this question will be answered several times, but I had to chuckle >> because I didn't know what it meant for ages, but was afraid to ask. >> IMHO means In My Humble Opinion. >> Now, who wants to tell her what ROFLMAO means? LOL >> Peggy >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 07:46:39 -0500 >> From: patti zapf <[log in to unmask]> >> Subject: Re: a thought >> >> Kathleen: >> what does IMHO mean? >> >> Patti >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Parkinson's Information Exchange Network >> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Kathleen Cochran >> Sent: Sunday, August 23, 2009 8:30 AM >> To: [log in to unmask] >> Subject: Re: a thought >> >> Just a reminder: for many of us on this list, "they"(PWP) = "us" ...a >> highly >> idiosyncratic, one size does NOT fit all, us. >> >> I can only speak for myself, but for me, a characterization of PWP as >> "rigid >> in their thinking" is not helpful. >> >> No offense, Mary Ann. I appreciate your contributions very much. :-) >> >> It's just that-again, speaking only for myself-there's a fine line where >> caregiver discussions become counterproductive for PWP and IMHO we are >> skirting that line. >> >> Kathleen >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto: >> [log in to unmask] >> In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn >> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto: > [log in to unmask] > In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask] In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn ------------------------------ End of PARKINSN Digest - 27 Aug 2009 (#2009-287) ************************************************ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask] In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn