Print

Print


Roger, this would be fine for me.  Are we talking about June 1st or May 
31st?  Theresa.

Roger Graves wrote:
> While registering for the CASDW conference the other day I started to 
> think about booking airfare, and that made me consider dates for my 
> return flight. We had talked on this list about an Inkshed conference 
> this year (see Brock MacDonald's message below) and perhaps drawing 
> upon shurli macmillan's ideas (1-4) for the program:
>
> 1.  a space to share drafts with other writers working to get an
> article publication-ready
> 2. an opportunity to meet with others working with a particular
> theoretical framework or concept or method intrinsic to their research
> 3. an opportunity to bring a pedagogical practice for a test-run and
> discussion
> 4.  inkshedding and discussion in response to CASDW papers or panels...
>
> I checked into renting a meeting room at a hotel, and the costs worked 
> out to $640 ($500 plus taxes) for the room plus whatever food and 
> drink we wanted to order (approximately $40/person for a buffet 
> lunch). With 20 people attending the room cost would be roughly $30 
> each; the room plus lunch would be about $75 per person based on 20 
> people registering. The room holds 36 people and can be set up with 
> round tables.
>
> Is there any interest in doing this? We need a decision before people 
> start booking tickets, I think.
>
> Roger
>
>
> Roger Graves
> Director, Writing Across the Curriculum
> [log in to unmask]
> http://www.ualberta.ca/~graves1/index.html
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>> From: Brock MacDonald <[log in to unmask]>
>> Date: June 2, 2009 9:09:58 AM MDT (CA)
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: Inkshed 2010
>> Reply-To: CASLL/Inkshed <[log in to unmask]>
>>
>> Graham's forthright rejection of nostalgia for the "old Inkshed days" 
>> is actually very much in the spirit of the meeting we had in 
>> Ottawa-not that a certain amount of nostalgia wasn't expressed there, 
>> but it quickly yielded to more pragmatic considerations.  Taking up 
>> Roger's call (or challenge?) to elaborate on his summary, here's my 
>> sense of the main points of our deliberations, which I hope will be 
>> helpful:
>>
>> We talked quite a bit about the fact that the Canadian conferencing 
>> landscape has changed since the old Inkshed days.  CATTW has morphed 
>> into CASDW and now seems to meet the conferencing needs of a wider 
>> membership, with a wider range of research and teaching interests, 
>> than it used to; the formation of the Canadian Writing Centres 
>> Association (CWCA) has given that constituency a separate conference 
>> of its own.  The current strength of these other conferences means 
>> that Inkshed needs to redefine its niche-it needs to offer something 
>> compelling and distinctive, if it is to continue.
>>
>> We all agreed that Inkshed's greatest strength was always its 
>> character as a kind of anti-conference, different from the standard 
>> ninety-minute-panel, twenty-minutes-per-talk, 
>> ten-minutes-of-questions model.  However, we noted that Inkshed has 
>> actually drifted towards that standard talking-heads model in recent 
>> years, simply to accommodate the number of participants who wanted to 
>> present.  This trend has meant less and less time for both 
>> inkshedding and discussion, both of which, we all agreed, were 
>> important elements of the conference.
>>
>> A side issue, but nevertheless a very important consideration: we 
>> agreed that Inkshed as a kind of retreat experience (three days 
>> isolated in a resort somewhere, all participants present the whole 
>> time) is no longer tenable.  The cost factor puts participation out 
>> of reach for grad students and the underemployed, and it makes 
>> attending increasingly difficult even for well-established members.
>>
>> So, we asked ourselves, with all these things in mind, is there a 
>> need and a purpose for Inkshed now, and if so in what form?  Do we in 
>> fact want something different, an anti-conference (for lack of a 
>> better term) that offers a kind of experience that CASDW and CWCA 
>> don't?  Obviously, all of us who were at the Ottawa meeting agreed 
>> that we do, but this is the first question that everyone else in 
>> CASLL now needs to ponder, it seems to me, before we start thinking 
>> about the planning questions Roger has raised.
>>
>> In Ottawa we did go so far as to speculate that this reconfigured or 
>> reborn Inkshed might not have conventional papers at all, that it 
>> could be some kind of "working conference" (as indeed Inkshed was in 
>> some of its early years), its details, focus, process, etc to be 
>> determined later.  We also came up with the schedule Roger has 
>> outlined, Inkshed following CASDW but away from the Congress site, so 
>> that it would be clearly distinct from the latter (I don't recall 
>> that we agreed that Talent Night would be on the first evening, 
>> though, Roger-I don't think it will work except at the end, 
>> considering how much of the fun is usually based on the conference 
>> itself).  However, as I said, the detailed planning should really 
>> come a bit later; to Inkshed, or not to Inkshed-at all!--that's the 
>> first question.
>>
>> Brock
>>
>>
>>
>> On 01/06/09 3:00 PM, "Graham Smart" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> Well, OK, hoping to get a conversation started, here goes:  For me 
>> the decision about whether to stay in Montreal an extra day to attend 
>> Inkshed would depend entirely on what was planned for the Tuesday.  
>> The question for me would be, will what's planned for the day 
>> contribute to my research and/or teaching in some way?  To be 
>> brutally honest, feelings of nostalgia for the 'old Inkshed days' 
>> wouldn't enter the picture in any real way.
>>
>> Having just come back from Hong Kong, mainland China, and Vietnam, 
>> where people seem to have a much greater and wonderfully gracious 
>> sense of community, beyond the self, I realize how individualistic 
>> and self-centred this sounds, but if I'm honest, this is what I would 
>> be thinking about in making a decision.
>>
>> Graham
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Roger Graves <[log in to unmask]>
>> Date: Monday, June 1, 2009 12:27 pm
>> Subject: Re: Inkshed 2010
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>
>>> I am writing to share the results of a meeting of people
>>> interested in
>>> attending an Inkshed conference next year who also happened to
>>> be
>>> attending the Canadian Association for the Study of Discourse
>>> and
>>> Writing meeting in Ottawa May 24-26.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> About 18 people talked about the possibility of organizing an
>>> Inkshed
>>> conference next year. The group decided that there was interest
>>> in
>>> holding a conference. This group, composed of people attending
>>> the
>>> CASDW, felt that holding Inkshed immediately after the
>>> CASDW
>>> conference was a workable plan. A proposal was floated to devote
>>> the
>>> evening after the third day of CASDW (Monday May 31 2010) and
>>> all day
>>> the next day (Tuesday June 1 2010). The Monday meeting would be
>>> held
>>> in the McGill Graduate Student centre and consist of the AGM
>>> and
>>> "talent" night, and the Tuesday would the program of the
>>> conference.
>>> The Tuesday meeting would be held in a meeting room at one of
>>> the
>>> Congress hotels, and would include lunch. Inkshedders would
>>> be
>>> responsible for their own accommodations, breakfast, and dinner.
>>> Costs
>>> for the conference would likely be limited to the lunch and the
>>> costs
>>> of renting the meeting room.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The format and nature of the program is yet to be determined; I
>>> am
>>> seeking descriptions proposing what that program might look like
>>> to
>>> include in the next issue of the Newsletter.  Please send
>>> these to
>>> Heather Graves ([log in to unmask]) or
>>> [log in to unmask]
>>> before July 31.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>                -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>  To leave the list, send a SIGNOFF CASLL command to
>  [log in to unmask] or, if you experience difficulties,
>         write to Russ Hunt at [log in to unmask]
>
> For the list archives and information about the organization,
>    its newsletter, and the annual conference, go to
>              http://www.stu.ca/inkshed/
>                 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

                -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
  To leave the list, send a SIGNOFF CASLL command to
  [log in to unmask] or, if you experience difficulties,
         write to Russ Hunt at [log in to unmask]

For the list archives and information about the organization,
    its newsletter, and the annual conference, go to
              http://www.stu.ca/inkshed/
                 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-