Hi guys,
I’m simply stunned by Fuentes lack of reasoning!!!! I was thinking someone would argue that speeders opposed stem cell research or fine payers in general might object to the purpose of the fund, like religious schools or something they disagreed with.
If you can send me Fuentes address I will snail mail him as I really want an answer and fear that being out of state he will ignore my email. Disease and disability know no state borders, so this legislation affects everyone.
From: Don Reed
Sent: Monday, May 30, 2011 11:20 AM
To: undisclosed-recipients:
Subject: DELAYED BUT NOT DEFEATED: Paralysis Research Bill Shot Down in Committee
DELAYED BUT NOT DEFEATED: Paralysis Research Bill Shot Down in Committee
By Don C. Reed
California’s AB 190 (Wieckowski, D-Fremont) has been—at least temporarily—killed in committee.
The bill would have provided funding for the Roman Reed Spinal Cord Injury Research Act. It was denied (without even a public vote) by Appropriations Chairman Felipe Fuentes (D-39). Apparently, Chairman Fuentes had a philosophical disagreement with the funding mechanism of the bill, a small ($3) penalty add-on to traffic fines. This penalty seemed logical, car crash being a major cause of spinal cord injury.
It only took about ten seconds to shoot down the hopes and dreams of millions of paralysis sufferers.
“AB 190, Wieckowski, would increase traffic fines to fund spinal cord injury research. Hold in committee.”
Translation: the bill is stopped, at least for now.
Who won?
1. The anti-research arm of the Religious Right. Because we are in favor of stem cell research, (though we have not funded any since 2008) the Family Research Council (FRC) with its ten million dollar annual budget listed our small bill as one to destroy. They won.
2. The American Automobile Association (triple A) opposed the bill because it fined bad drivers. They won.
3. Bad drivers emerged victorious; their traffic violation fines will not be increased. They won.
Who lost?
1. Five and a half million paralysis sufferers (including six hundred and fifty thousand Californians)—and people in other countries who might have benefited from research discoveries. They lost.
2. The families of paralyzed children or adults, those who provide the endless and exhausting physical care for their loved one, or pay to have it done. They lost.
3. American taxpayers lost. So long as paralysis remains incurable, the cost of programs like Medicare and Medi-Cal can only increase. Medical care for just one paralyzed person can cost three to five million dollars—few have that kind of money, so they look to government for help.
Chairman Fuentes is an honorable man, with strict principles. As Appropriations chair, it is his difficult job to oversee any bills having to do with tax money. (I am still not entirely clear on why a bill which had no tax money at all was even seen by his committee, but that was what happened.)
Mr. Fuentes has a philosophical stance that he does not approve of funding government by fees or fines. A reasonable position, to be sure.
But does not every rule have an exception? Even a strict vegetarian might eat meat if they were starving, and a little flexibility would have been appreciated. Certainly, we met the chair’s objections more than half-way—we offered a 2/3 compromise, cutting back from $3 to $1. We even had an “opt-out” provision, so any county which did not like the program could choose not to participate.
Our offers were ignored.
But something Chairman Fuentes said at the hearing really stuck with me.
First, he said that never in memory had California legislators asked for proportionately so little money— roughly $1.5 billion in new programs—and of that, only $60 million would be approved by his committee.
He also said (and just for a second, his glance flicked to Roman in his wheelchair) that “programs would only be funded the right way”— the right way? What does that mean?
Consider what California faces today.
Under the present tax law, (Prop 13) our state cannot really tax the rich any more, no matter how fabulously wealthy they become, nor how great the need. Prop 13 requires a 2/3 majority to increase any taxes whatsoever, and Republicans take a pledge to never support any new taxes, no matter what. This allows a small number of Republicans to block the will of the majority.
It’s great if you are rich, but sometimes not too wonderful for the rest of us.
So if we cannot use tax money-- and the Chair won’t let us penalize bad drivers who may cause paralysis— what exactly is “the right way” to fund paralysis cure research?
What legislative path would Chairman Fuentes suggest? This is not a rhetorical question, I genuinely want to know. Because our bill will be coming back, one way or another, and I need to find a way to earn the Chairman’s support.
If we can’t use taxes, and he won’t let us use fines—what are we supposed to do?
Maybe you could ask him too. Here is his website.
http://asmdc.org/members/a39/
I would appreciate it if you sent him a brief email, asking him why he denied AB 190, the zero-tax funding source for the Roman Reed Spinal Cord Injury Research Act, and what changes would he require to let the bill survive his committee?
Also, if you live in Chairman Fuentes’ district, consider writing a letter to the editor of your local newspaper, asking him what better alternative could he come up with, since he shot down AB 190?
Even if you don’t live in his district, here is the biggest newsweekly in his area.
http://www.echo-media.com/mediaDetail.php?ID=14543.
I will be writing letters questioning the decision, and maybe you would help with one as well.
For example, this letter from my friend Ray Lee, a Parkinson’s advocate in Arizona, who asked:
“Why did the committee prevent AB 190 from going forward? What were the arguments against a $3.00 fine for speeders? Who was against it? In the 1960’s I volunteered in the spinal cord injury ward of a Long Beach California hospital. Do patients have to wait another half century for help?
Rayilyn Brown
Past Director AZNPF
Arizona Chapter National Parkinson Foundation
So what comes next?
We try again. We can fail as many times as needed, so long as we eventually win.
Fortunately, the leader of our bill, Bob Wieckowski (D-Fremont) has the vision and the strength to carry on. After the bill was shot down, it would have been very easy for him just to shake our hands and wish us well. We would have parted friends.
But in the office after Chairman Fuentes offered the ten-second announcement of doom, the conversation was NOT about commiseration and blame—it was “where do we go next?”
Maybe there are some internal negotiation moves that can be tried. He will be investigating those.
Or maybe we just start all over again.
One possibility might be called Pocket Change for Paralysis Cure.
Here is how it would work.
It would still be a traffic ticket add-on, because that is the most direct connection.
But it would be so small it should not offend anyone.
We would not ask for fifteen dollars per ticket, as New York did, nor $100 per violation, as South Carolina does to this very day-- nor three dollars, nor even one dollar, our fallback position this time.
Instead we would request the staggering sum of-- fifty cents.
Fifty cents. Half a buck, a handful of pennies-- you have that much in your couch cushions.
But if that tiniest of amounts was gained from each of California’s three million plus traffic violators, (3,800,000 last year) it would net $1.9 million, allowing the research program to continue.
It would cost the taxpayer exactly nothing.
Would any politician grudge us fifty cents to fund research for paralysis cure?
Only one way to find out.
Stay tuned.
Papers covering the San Fernando Valley Area
Name
Phone/Fax/Internet Address/Email Address
BUSINESS LIFE MAGAZINE
(818) 240-7088 / (818) 240-7320
www.businesslife.com
[log in to unmask]
CALIFORNIA JOURNAL FOR FILIPINO AMERICANS
(310) 532-6238 / (310) 532-6242 - no faxes accepted
www.caljournal.com
[log in to unmask]
CONTACTO MAGAZINE
(818) 241-4073
www.contactomagazine.com
[log in to unmask]
DAILY NEWS OF LOS ANGELES
(818) 713-3000 / (818) 713-0058
www.dailynews.com
[log in to unmask]
DAILY NEWS - GLENDALE BUREAU
(818) 546-3315 / (818) 546-3310
DAILY NEWS - LOS ANGELES BUREAU
(213) 978-0390 / (213) 617-0223
EL AVISO (Magazine)
(323) 586-9199 / (323) 589-9395
www.elaviso.com
[log in to unmask]
EL SALVADOR DIA A DIA
(323) 737-7910 / (323) 737-1916
HOY
(213) 237-3001 / (213) 237-4928
www.vivelohoy.com
JACKSON PUBLISHING COMPANY
(323) 934-6397 / (323) 965-1803
www.jacksonpublishing.com
[log in to unmask]
LA GUIA FAMILIAR
(818) 882-9200 / (818) 882-2625
http://www.latinpublications.com
[log in to unmask]
LA OPINION
(213) 869-2011 / (213) 896-2077
www.laopinion.com
[log in to unmask]
LA VOZ LIBRE
(213) 488-0271 / (213) 388-2053
[log in to unmask]
L’ITALO AMERICANO
(818) 767-3413 / (818) 767-1410
www.italoamericano.com
[log in to unmask]
LOS ANGELES TIMES
(213) 237-5000 / (213) 237-7190
www.latimes.com
[log in to unmask]
LOS ANGELES BAY NEWS OBSERVER Valley Edition (Inglewood / San Fernando Valley)
[log in to unmask]
LOS ANGELES METROPOLITAN GAZETTE
(818) 782-8695 / (818) 782-4724
[log in to unmask]
NEW ARMENIA DAILY
(818) 246-6468
[log in to unmask]
SAN FERNANDO VALLEY BUSINESS JOURNAL
(818) 676-1950 / (818) 676-1747
www.sfvbj.com
[log in to unmask]
SAN FERNANDO VALLEY SUN
(818) 365-3111 / (818) 898-7135
www.sanfernandosun.com
[log in to unmask]
TAIWAN DAILY NEWS
(626) 455-0228 / (626) 455-0898
http://www.taiwandaily.net
VALLEY VOICE
(310) 429-0484 / (818) 739-6854
www.evalleyvoice.com
VALLEY NEWS GROUP
(818) 223-9545 / (818) 223-9552
www.valleynewsgroup.com
Don C. Reed
Twitter: @diverdonreed
Sponsor, Roman Reed Spinal Cord Injury Research Act
co-chair, Californians for Cures
Vice President, Public Policy, Americans for Cures
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn
