Print

Print


Hi Rick; the difference between the way I see it, as opposed to many on this 
site; it's obvious that I am convinced the government IS the problem, not 
the solution.  The thousands of alphabet soup agencies that had such glowing 
promise of solving a particular social or economic injustice has been a 
miserable failure,  with the only answer from the Feds: create more 
bureaucracy and increase spending.  Jimmy Carter in 1976, I believe, created 
the Dept. of Energy to end our reliance on foreign oil, by "developing and 
producing domestic supplies".  OSHA was created to increase safety in the 
workplace, but has had little or no impact. (But has caused tremendous cost 
increases).  The NLRB was originally formed as an un-biased Federal Agency 
to settle disputes between Management and Labor.  Now, it is a crusader for 
Organized Labor.... This Behemoth (Big Government) has a voracious and 
insatiable appetite that has the US, as well as most of the industrial 
nations drowning in red ink.  We are broke, period.

With our huge deficits growing exponentially, Obama trots out his answer to 
Health Insurance, claiming it will lower medical costs.  Of coarse, the 
numbers used have been proven to be as worthless as the paper it's written 
on, with the GAO and bi-partisan congressional review stating the  actual 
cost is triple the projections....

One of the lead proponents of Obama-Care is in love with Great Britain's 
plan.  I've read some interesting comments and some history..correct me if 
this is not accurate;  some claim that the glowing promise of the newly 
formed NHS in July of 1948 becoming the bench mark for Socialized Medicine 
has failed miserably, considered by many as the worst of all the 
industrialized nations.  Costs have exploded.  The NHS uses the most 
aggressive pricing in the West, going so far as to assign a price to the 
"Quality-Adjusted Life Year", that is required to extend it.  But from 
1996-2008 national health costs in the UK have gone up 6.7%, compared with 
5.7% in the U.S.  If you don't qualify under the "Quality-adjusted Life Year 
criterion, and chose to have the treatment and pay for it yourself, you are 
kicked off the NHS for life.

Terminally ill patients are classified as "close to death" to allow removal 
of expensive life support.  Hip and knee replacement schedules are supposed 
to be 5 months, but are actually a 11 month wait.  If you buy a drug that 
NHS won't cover, you're expelled for ever.  In 1999, realizing they couldn't 
absorb the skyrocketing costs, they formed rationing boards whose sole 
purpose was to identify and limit coverage to those procedures that were 
deemed "cost effective".  The "QALY" was formed precisely to deny elderly 
care patients and shift coverage to younger, healthier patients.  This 
probably explains the statistics that show the UK with the highest mortality 
rates for elderly patients diagnosed  with cancer or chronic illnesses.

There's much, much more that should cause us to pause, ponder, and heed the 
warning signs....they are there.

Dave

P.S.:  Rick, I didn't refer to them as "death panels", and didn't compare 
Obama to Stalin.  :)

-----Original Message----- 
From: Rick McGirr
Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2012 11:05 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: WHAT W I LL YOU DO IN NOVEMBER?
David,

If America is so wealthy, why are so many people living without any 
healthcare at all?

We have seen the profit motive at work in healthcare before, in the case of 
the pharmaceutical company which pulled the plug on a trial of GDNF. The 
chief exec of the company was caught saying, at a shareholder meeting, that 
treatments such as GDNF were not the way the company should go, because of 
its poor profit prospects. Left alone to cope in our free-market system, 
these poor subjects are stuck with the hardware for the delivery of GDNF 
still implanted in their bodies. This is not a hypothetical case. It 
actually happened.

Echoing Ray’s remarks, what if a cure for Parkinson’s was developed, but the 
projections for the profitability were low enough to steer the most 
companies away from the cure’s development and mass production? Is there no 
point at all when a caring society should stand up for all the ones who 
would be left in the lurch? Are we to sit idly by and let the bulls trample 
our chance of regaining what we have lost during our tenure as inmates in 
the PD prison?

David, I just don’t know how you could fall for the “death committee” lies 
and the comparisons of Mr. Obama’s presidency to Stalinist Russia in the 
mid-20th century.  I say if there is enough money in our society to fight 
two or three simultaneous wars and bully the rest of the world with our 
military in the vanguard, bail out the banks and Chevrolet, and give the 
proposed tax cuts to the wealthiest beneficiaries of the free-market, there 
certainly should be a little pile of coins that we could sweep up after the 
capitalist binge, enough to provide for development of unprofitable but 
effective treatments, along with coverage for those who can’t afford it.

Being deemed “unfit for further treatment” is much more likely in the system 
that existed before the Affordable Healthcare Act. I’m sure there are many 
on this listserve who can testify to having been denied prescription 
coverage, or paying hundreds of dollars for a single bottle of pills. And I’m 
sure that all of us have heard horror stories about people being denied care 
in emergency rooms, and later dying because they didn’t have insurance 
coverage. In fact, committees who do indeed decide people’s fate on a 
cost-benefit basis exist right now, today, only they are not created and run 
by President Obama and his sinister squad of eugenic scientists. They are 
just part of the daily practice of running a health insurance company.

It's becoming increasingly harder to watch these discussions without 
participating. Hope you don't mind.

Rick McGirr

-----Original Message-----
From: Parkinson's Information Exchange Network 
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Rayilyn Brown
Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2012 2:53 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: WHAT W I LL YOU DO IN NOVEMBER?

Hi David,

and thanks for responding.  I guess you fear Obama has death panels in store 
for us, right?  So what do you suggest for health care?

At one time in history  feudalism was a  "better" system.   Capitalism and
industralization  definitely led to human progress; non-industial societies 
don't do very well.  But is this the end of the  line?  The best we can do?
I specifically asked why profit had to be a part of health  care and you did 
not address that question.

The defects of the "free market" system put us in this mess, not Mr. Obama.
The repeal of  the Glass-Seagall Act's ban on investment and commercial 
banking in one institution led to the financial breakdown.  It had kept us 
safe since the 1930's

I for one  am tired of hearing about the superiority of the  United States.
For your information  DBS was first done by a French doctor.   ProSavin is
only being  done in the UK and France.

I also think the big government vs. small government issue is a phony one.
What matters is who is in  the government not how big or small it is.  For 
the past few decades  Republicans have gotten control  of  many state 
governments.  Witness the retrogressive, extremist legislation they are 
producing or attempting to produce, personhood laws, bans on collective 
bargaining, invasive vaginal exams, voter suppression, anti-abortion, stand 
your ground, etc.  Talk about Big Brother!!!!

These issues do affect people with Parkinson's and all diseases for that
matter.   We ignore them at our peril.

-----Original Message-----
From: David McMurray
Sent: Saturday, April 14, 2012 12:26 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: WHAT W I LL YOU DO IN NOVEMBER?

Ray, your comments and questions warrant a response.....in general, profit 
has made this country the most prosperous, with the highest standard of 
living, in the history of mankind.  Instead of a system, like the Soviet 
Union and others that shared and share equally in scarcity, (which increases 
human suffering and a poverty standard of living), our Free Market economy 
has done just the opposite.  And if we can reverse the direction that Mr.
Obama has pointed us in, we will continue to see opportunities for those who 
want to work hard and improve their lot in life.

I am much more concerned about Big Brother telling us what we can or cannot 
be treated for.  I've seen the quotes, and the Panels of Experts that will 
eventually be formed under ObamaCare will have the power to deem an 
individual unfit for further treatment, or a specific treatment, (based on 
economic concerns, i.e., what's the cost/benefit factor.)  Obama has 
mentioned the fact that the rising cost of Care is directly related to the 
increased numbers of the Senior population and the expensive treatment for 
serious illnesses common to them.  Denying treatment is going to be a major 
cost-cutting feature of OBC.....this concept used to be" Unthinkable", but 
has become "Thinkable", soon to be "Acceptable".....all done for the "common 
good".

November, for me is a "no-brainer"....:):)

Dave



-----Original Message-----
From: Rayilyn Brown
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2012 1:57 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: WHAT W I LL YOU DO IN NOVEMBER?

I just heard Romney’s address to the NRA.  he said Obama is destroying our 
economic, religious and personal freedom (to choose our own health  care),
and the constitution .   The Declaration of Independence god-given rights
was also cited.

What kind of a  life does one have with Parkinson’s?

Is a cure going to come from the free  market which sees no profit in a 
cure, the churches, or the NRA?

Can someone tell me why profit has to be the foundation of our health care?

WHAT A TERRIBLE SHAME IT WOULD BE IF PROSAVIN TURNED OUT TO BE A CURE FOR 
PD, BUT WAS NOT PROFITABLE ENOUGH FOR THE “JOB CREATORS”!!

Please, I beg you, don’t return us to the past.

Ray
Rayilyn Brown
Past Director AZNPF
Arizona Chapter National Parkinson Foundation

----------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn

----------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn

----------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn

----------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn 

----------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn