Print

Print


You are doing just fine posting all sorts of important information for PWP. 
Good for you, Ray.  We all depend upon you so just keep on keeping on.  :-)
---------
Mary Ann
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Rayilyn Brown" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, January 26, 2014 7:10 PM
Subject: Re: ProSavin gene therapy


> Mary  Ann
>
> Great you have  such close family!!  Medical clinic sounds interesting.
>
> I haven't down such a good job of posting since my research buddy, Diane, 
> died over two years ago.   also  my  computer does some strange things 
> when I move the  mouse and "click".  Its harder to cut and paste now, but 
> I hope I won't  miss real news.
>
> -----Original Message----- 
> From: Mary Ann Ryan
> Sent: Friday, January 24, 2014 7:46 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: ProSavin gene therapy
>
> Ray, life is good here.  Jamie continues to be a part of our lives - my
> grandkids sit in his recliner more than in any other furniture in the 
> house
> so I think they feel his sweet presence.  I volunteer once a week at a
> homeless shelter  - I run a medical clinic there.  We still have the farm
> and continue to plant a huge garden every year.  My daughter and her 
> husband
> plus their two kids live with me so I never feel alone.  My son and
> daughter-in-law visit frequently.
>
> It's good to see that you still are active in informing PWP about studies
> and the need for advocacy.  Thanks for all that you do.
> --------
> Mary Ann
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Rayilyn Brown" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 2:20 PM
> Subject: Re: ProSavin gene therapy
>
>
>> you're welcome, Mary Ann.   How are you doing?
>>
>> -----Original Message----- 
>> From: Mary Ann Ryan
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 7:31 AM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: ProSavin gene therapy
>>
>> Thanks, Ray.  This is great information and I plan on saving it for 
>> future
>> use.  It is frustrating that a miracle therapy is not on the horizon but 
>> at
>> least you got the attention of this doctor so that the PD community can 
>> be
>> better informed.  Thank you so much for your effort.
>> -------
>> Mary Ann (CG Jamie 68/28 with PD, died 11/20/07)
>>
>>
>>
>>> Dear Rayilyn,
>>>
>>> I perfectly understand your current situation. Although I have been 
>>> trained as MD, I have never treated patients since I am engaged 100% in 
>>> PD research. I am in close contact with the Spanish association of 
>>> Parkinson's disease, and I strongly feel that one of my obligations is 
>>> to explain the patients what's going on in PD research. I know that it 
>>> is fustrating to see that anything new has arrived in the past few 
>>> years, besides some minor improvements in dopamine-replacement therapies 
>>> (if I am right, a phase 2 trial testing an inhaled preparation of 
>>> levodopa is going to start soon in US). When attending scientific 
>>> meetings, the overall feeling is that everybody is always moving around 
>>> the same topics, without any real new improvement or any real new ideas 
>>> to follow. In this regard, gene-based therapies such as ProSavin at 
>>> least represent something different. I cannot anticipate how long will 
>>> it take to see these new arrivals fully available in the market as a 
>>> therapeutic tool. Nevertheless, I still thinking that approaches this 
>>> kind at least represent something different, and I am sure that this is 
>>> a right step in the right direction. In the past two years my group has 
>>> received some EU funding to start testing different approaches of gene 
>>> therapy for manipulating basal ganglia circuits. We are using 
>>> MPTP-treated monkeys since these represent the best animal model 
>>> available so far, and working with monkeys speeds up the time required 
>>> to start testing new tools in humans suffering from PD. I can give you 
>>> my word that we are working very hard trying to generate the expected 
>>> results asap. We have just started several experiments, all very risky 
>>> approaches, and therefore I cannot anticipate any final result. 
>>> Nevertheless, you can be sure that the situation of PD patients always 
>>> is very well represented in my mind at all times.
>>>
>>> I know that it is not easy to be optimistic in the current scenario. 
>>> However, my personal feeling is that testing some new research avenues 
>>> has just been started. There is too much pressure to go traslational, 
>>> and to start testing new approaches in patients asap. This pressure 
>>> implies that some promising things enter clinical trials too early, and 
>>> therefore it is fustrating to see that most of these new therapies 
>>> failed in clinical trials. Just simply remember the failures of GDNF and 
>>> nurturin. These are very good examples of promising things that failed 
>>> because by the time these get tested in humans, we knew very little 
>>> about their function. For instance, by the time in which GDNF entered 
>>> phases 1-2 (the "Kentucky" and "Bristol" trials), we didn't knew too 
>>> much about the neurobiology of GDNF. Researches we have to deal with 
>>> this pressure, that's life. However, my feeling is that we cannot 
>>> generate any solid expectances for PD patients without a clear 
>>> proof-of-principle. As I have mentioned before, some failures we have 
>>> seen in the past easily rank within this category of things being tested 
>>> too early.
>>>
>>> According to the published results from ProSavin, this might not be seen 
>>> as the way to go. My opinion is just the opposite. Although I will have 
>>> been delighted to see a better clinical outcome, the important argument 
>>> of ProSavin is that approaches this kind at least opens new vistas in PD 
>>> research. I can perfectly understand that you are tired of getting worse 
>>> and waiting. I just can tell you that everything that me -and many 
>>> others- we are currently doing is done bearing in mind at all times the 
>>> clinical situation of thousands of PD patients. You are our main 
>>> motivation, and this is how things should be. Of course I cannot promise 
>>> any miracle, just a tireless effort in PD research, every day.
>>>
>>> All the best and have a nice day, Jose L. Lanciego
>>>
>>> Rayilyn Brown escribió:
>>>> Jose
>>>>
>>>> I've had PD 18 years, have gotten worse, am 78 years old and fear at 
>>>> the present pace of research will not live long enough to benefit from 
>>>> any of the 'promising" treatments on the horizon.  I'm tired of getting 
>>>> worse and waiting.  But then I'm anemic, maybe that’s it.
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message----- From: José Luis Lanciego
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2014 3:06 AM
>>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>>> Subject: Re: ProSavin gene therapy
>>>>
>>>> Dear Rayilyn,
>>>>
>>>> I guess this is not discouraging at all. Although this is a preliminary
>>>> study, my feeling is that ProSavin represents a right step in the right
>>>> direction. A number of gene therapy experiments are currently 
>>>> undergoing
>>>> and we will see what's coming out in the next few years. Indeed, this
>>>> approach -and few more under experimental implementation- is something
>>>> different, e.g., it is not based on dopamine-replacement strategies. My
>>>> laboratory -as many others- strongly feels that many new arrivals can 
>>>> be
>>>> expected from gene therapy experiments, with the ultimate goal of using
>>>> gene therapy tools to manipulate basal ganglia circuits. Compared to
>>>> cell therapies, gene therapy seems to be a much more feasible and
>>>> realistic strategy.
>>>>
>>>> All the best and have a nice day, Jose L. Lanciego
>>>>
>>>> Rayilyn Brown escribió:
>>>>> discouraging isn't it?
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message----- From: Nic Marais
>>>>> Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2014 12:29 AM
>>>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>>>> Subject: Re: ProSavin gene therapy
>>>>>
>>>>> When you read the Viartis notification, it does not look as positive 
>>>>> as
>>>>> this article...
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.viartis.net/parkinsons.disease/news/140113.htm
>>>>>
>>>>> Nic 61/19
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 17 January 2014 21:18, Rayilyn Brown <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.domain-b.com/technology/Health_Medicine/20140115_patients.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ray
>>>>>> Rayilyn
>>>>>> Past Director AZNPF
>>>>>> Arizona Chapter National Parkinson Foundation
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:
>>>>>> [log in to unmask]
>>>>>> In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: 
>>>>> mailto:[log in to unmask]
>>>>> In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn
>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: 
>>>>> mailto:[log in to unmask]
>>>>> In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: 
>>>> mailto:[log in to unmask]
>>>> In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: 
>>>> mailto:[log in to unmask]
>>>> In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn
>>>>
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: 
>>> mailto:[log in to unmask]
>>> In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: 
>> mailto:[log in to unmask]
>> In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: 
>> mailto:[log in to unmask]
>> In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: 
> mailto:[log in to unmask]
> In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: 
> mailto:[log in to unmask]
> In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn 

----------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn