 |
 |
I wondered if it was something I said ! Bang their heads together till they sort it out. > Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2014 06:56:56 +0800 > From: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Re: Fw: Fwd: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask] > To: [log in to unmask] > > AOL is rejecting all listserv mail and the listserv automatically > deletes subscribers membership when the rejections by a provider > exceed 3 bounces. > > AOL DMARC security is the culprit. I suggest Innarellar take it up with them. > > http://postmaster-blog.aol.com/2014/04/22/aol-mail-updates-dmarc-policy-to-reject/ > > John Cottingham > co-owner Parkinsn > > At 07:35 AM 7/6/2014, you wrote: > >I have no idea, maybe John can help > >From: <mailto:[log in to unmask]>[log in to unmask] > >Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2014 4:23 PM > >To: <mailto:[log in to unmask]>[log in to unmask] > >Subject: Fwd: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask] > > > > > >Hi Ray. I received this email yesterday and tried to respond but my > >response wasn't allowed. Can you help me as to what went > >wrong? Thanks. Roberta Innarella > > > >---------- > >From: [log in to unmask] > >To: [log in to unmask] > >Sent: 7/5/2014 7:20:39 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time > >Subj: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask] > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: [log in to unmask] > >Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2014 19:20:36 -0400 (EDT) > >Subject: Fwd: Your removal from the PARKINSN list > >To: [log in to unmask] > > > > > >Why have I received this email? Roberta Innarella > > > > > > > >____________________________________ > >From: [log in to unmask] > >Reply-to: [log in to unmask] > >To: [log in to unmask] > >Sent: 7/4/2014 12:00:37 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time > >Subj: Your removal from the PARKINSN list > > > > > >Fri, 4 Jul 2014 00:00:16 > > > >You have been automatically removed from the PARKINSN list (Parkinson's > >Information Exchange Network) as a result of repeated delivery error > >reports from your mail system. This decision was based on the automatic > >error monitoring policy in effect for the list, and has not been reviewed > >or otherwise confirmed by a human being. If you receive this message, it > >means that something is wrong: while you are obviously able to receive > >mail, your mail system has been regularly reporting that your account did > >not exist, or that you were otherwise permanently unable to receive mail. > >Here is some information which may assist you or your local help desk in > >determining the cause of the problem: > > > >- The failing address is [log in to unmask] > > > >- The first error was reported on 2014-06-28. > > > >- Since then, a total of 3 delivery errors have been received. > > > >- The last reported error was: 5.0.0 521 (5.2.1 : [DMARC] This message > >failed DMARC Evaluation and is being refused due to provided DMARC > >Policy) > > > >PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE THIS MESSAGE. While you can of course re-subscribe > >to the list, it is important for you to report this problem to your mail > >administrator so that it can be solved. This problem is not specific to > >the PARKINSN list, and also affects your private mail. This means that > >YOU HAVE PROBABLY LOST SOME PRIVATE MAIL AS WELL. Anyone trying to write > >to you during the same time frame will probably have received the same > >errors for the same reason. The PARKINSN list is but one of the many > >people who may have tried to write to you while your mail system was > >malfunctioning. > > > >DO NOT LET TECHNICAL PEOPLE CONVINCE YOU THAT THIS IS NORMAL. It is never > >normal for a mail system to claim that a valid, working account does not > >exist, just as it would not be normal for the post office to return some > >of your mail with "addressee unknown" when the address was written > >correctly. It is true that some mail systems are less reliable than > >others, and your technical people may be doing the best they can with the > >tools they have. But, ultimately, the level of service that you are > >receiving is the result of a business decision, and not something due to > >a universal technical limitation that one can only accept. Reliable mail > >systems do exist, and it is ultimately up to you to decide whether this > >level of service is acceptable or not. > > > > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask] > >In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask] > In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask] In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn