Get Outlook for iOS

From: Highley, Christopher <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, August 24, 2019 1:46 PM
To: Alan H. NELSON; John Astington; Sean Benson; Nicola Boyle; David George; William Ingram; David Kathman; Sarah MacLean; Geoffrey Marsh; Kara Northway; Matteo Pangallo; [log in to unmask]; Paul White; Yates, Emily Caroline
Cc: Roslyn Knutson; Katharine Goodland; Eva Griffith; David Klausner; Peter Greenfield
Subject: SAA Theater History Seminar 2020
 
Dear Friends:

SAA have informed me that my seminar on 'London's Indoor Theaters' is in danger of being cancelled unless more people sign up ASAP.  I would be grateful if you could spread the word about the seminar and let me know of anyone you think may be interested in the topic.  It would be a shame to lose our only theater history seminar at SAA. 

SAA Seminar Proposal 2020

Chris Highley, Ohio State

London’s Indoor Playhouses

This seminar invites participants to explore the individual identities of, and relationships among, London's indoor playhouses in the early modern period. When the Salisbury Court theater opened in 1629, Londoners had three indoor venues to choose among: the Blackfriars and the Cockpit/Phoenix had been in operation since c.1608 and 1617 respectively. Playhouses in St. Paul's Precinct and the Liberty of Whitefriars had also been part of the theatrical scene until c.1614. All five playhouses were built in close proximity to one another either side of the City's western wall. But questions remain about the precise geography of each: what did it mean, for instance, that Blackfriars and Whitefriars sprang up in post-dissolution Liberties? And what did the presence of the Cockpit and Salisbury Court mean for their immediate environs and the development of the so-called 'west end'? Some questions that participants might consider: Should we think of the relationship among the playhouses as basically competitive or were the economic dynamics more complicated? In what ways did each playhouse develop its own distinctive repertory and how were the various repertories in conversation with one another? More generally, did each playhouse cultivate an individual identity or push distinct political or ideological agendas? And what do we know about the actual playgoers at these theaters, their playhouse preferences, patterns of attendance, and the coteries they may have formed?

Thanks and best wishes,

Chris Highley
Professor of English
Director, Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies
The Ohio State University