 |
 |
Barbara Michalak: They are not at all bulky, and work better than any bulky handle could ever work. It is even difficult for some people who see the simply lines to believe they work at all. Once you put them in your hands, it is like.... Well one person told me it was like Colombus's egg (Uovo di Colombo). He was in a bar one evening -true story- and like bar bets go, he told someone he could make an egg stand on end. You've probably heard it. Anyhow, when they said he couldn't do it, he tapped the egg on the end until he dented it a little bit - and voila'! The guy said "That's obvious". His answer was "it wasn't obvious to you until I did it". I would be happy to send you some photos. I think the pictures showing them being held with various hand positions would make it clear. I think you are absolutely right about the real problem being a poliltical and awareness problem. No doubt about it. But to me, in a sense, it is a moral one as well. And you can't mandate morality. For example: barrier free architecture means we are supposed to have accessibility - which naturally means ramps. There are examples of ramps throughout history which are not "handicap ramps" but means of gracefully winding up and down from one level to another - the concern had nothing to do with accessibility. You would think that a designer with a little talent would make the ramp something more (as the historical example - there are also some modern example). Unfortunately there are very few dignified ramps. For most corporate architectural firms, the ramp is a requirement. Just put it in. The conscientious designer dignifies it; the majority don't. It really is a great oppotunity that is being lost. Many examples could be cited. I think one of the world's greatest architects was Aalvar Aalto. He always considered the "weakest" persons in his designs. His hospitals and libraries - and countless other designs - show incredible sensitivity to the weak.