Your message was not delivered to one or more of:
[log in to unmask]
Recipient has too many outstanding messages in message store: [log in to unmask]
X'
No valid recipients in JNT header
Failed message follows:
Received: from ubvm.cc.buffalo.edu by ppsw1.cam.ac.uk
with SMTP-INT (PP-6.0) as ppsw.cam.ac.uk
id <[log in to unmask]>; Thu, 13 Oct 1994 03:45:29 +0100
Received: from UBVM.CC.BUFFALO.EDU by UBVM.cc.buffalo.edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
with BSMTP id 5326; Wed, 12 Oct 94 22:44:38 EDT
Received: from UBVM.CC.BUFFALO.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV@UBVM)
by UBVM.CC.BUFFALO.EDU (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 9449;
Wed, 12 Oct 1994 22:44:37 -0400
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 1994 22:43:33 -0400
Reply-To: "A. Young" <[log in to unmask]>
Sender: "REED-L: Records of Early English Drama Discussion" <REED-L%BITNET.UTORO
[log in to unmask]>
From: "A. Young" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Apologies
Comments: To: REED Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
To: Multiple recipients of list REED-L <[log in to unmask]
VM>
Message-ID: <"ppsw1.cam..446:13.09.94.02.45.33"@ppsw.cam.ac.uk>
I just noticed that the Cambridge University mail server quite ruthlessly
distributes error messages caused by a full mail box not just to the list
owner but in fact to the whole list!! Apologies for the two such
messages you have received.
I hope this does not happen again, tho' REED-L oldtimers will recall
another 'listserv gone wild' roller-coaster ride when I was out of town
and away from my account some years ago now. Please remember that if it
does, any message sent to the list itself will just make the problem
worse. Instead send personal mail to me at [log in to unmask] or
[log in to unmask] and I will deal with the matter as soon as
possible.
Abigail
