USA Today A12, 5/19/95 Today's debate: GENETICS VS. RELIGION Bad news for patients helped by gene therapy OUR VIEW A new coalition wants to halt pat- ents vital to lifesaving research. Why handicap disease fighters? There's bad news today for Joan Sa- muelson and others like her praying for ge- etic research to develop cures for their de- bilitating diseases or to ease their suffering. An ecumenical coalition of religious leaders representing more than 80 faiths and denominations joined biotechnology adversary Jeremy Rifkin Thursday to cam- paign against government patenting of hu- man and animal genes, cells and organs. If successful, these spiritual leaders could doom lifesaving genetic research -- and people like Samuelson, 45, of Santa Rosa, Calif. "Every day I lose more brain cells and develop more Parkinson's symp- toms," she says. "Someday I will be frozen in my body, able to think and feel but un- able to move or speak. We cannot allow this campaign to stall or stop research on a cure or breakthrough therapy." But that's exactly what biotech industry representatives say would happen if the re- ligious leaders prevail in their crusade. Patents are the lifeblood of research. They make it possible for biopharmaceuti- cal companies to attract investments to pay for the years of research and testing that can cost $300 million for a single drug. The patent provides an opportunity to make a profit before competitors can produce the same medicine. Patent protection was the basis for nearly all the 29 biotechnology drugs approved so far by the Food and Drug Administration. Among them: An anti-clot drug that has saved more than 500,000 heart-attack vic- tims since 1981. A blood-clotting drug im- portant to hemophiliacs. A drug that helps children with cystic fibrosis breathe more easily. Thanks to patent protections, today there are drugs to help people with multiple sclerosis, a vaccine for hepatitis B, diagnos- tic tests that help protect the blood supply from AIDS, detect colon, breast and pros- tate cancers and help identify diseases in the early stages while they can be treated. And strides are being made in hormone therapy for women and against sickle-cell anemia, HIV infection and Alzheimer's. All this even though the government has awarded patents for human gene develop- ments only since 1980. Only nine animal patents have been granted. It would be tragic to pull the plug on these and potential medical breakthroughs. The religious leaders obviously are sincere in their spiritual beliefs. But government policy should not be based on theology. And the fears most often voiced by Rifkin and other genetics critics -- that genetic re- search will foster nightmarish eugenics ex- periments or environmental catastrophe -- are exaggerated at best. Genetic research is more rigorously regu- lated in the United States than in any other country. Regulatory agencies involved in- clude the FDA, National Institutes of Health, Agriculture, Patent Office and the Environmental Protection Agency. Furthermore, many arguments against gene patenting are based on fallacies. It's not true, for instance, that genes are patented. Only the use of genetic material in a specific way for a specific purpose is protected. It's also not true that patents let anyone own life. They protect the work of appli- cants from being copied for 17 years. And it's not fair to accuse genetic re- searchers of playing God. They are saving lives, relieving suffering and preventing diseases -- which also happen to be basic tenets of nearly every faith. Perhaps one day the dangers of gene therapy may outweigh the benefits. But that day is not yet close. Certainly not close enough to justify handing thousands of des- perate sufferers like Joan Samuelson a sen- tence of painful, lingering death. ============================================ ============================================ ============================================ Let's stop paying God OPPOSING VIEW Don't turn over 'blue- prints of God's creation' to scien- tists, businesses to make a buck. By Jeremy Rifkin This week the religious leaders of more than 80 faiths and denominations an- nounced their opposition to the patenting of genetically engineered animals and hu- an genes, cells, organs and embryos. The Joint Appeal Against Human and Animal Patenting includes the titular heads of virtually all of the Protestant denomina- tions, more than 100 Catholic bishops, and Jewish, Muslim, Buddhist and Hindu reli- gious leaders. It is the broadest religious co- alition ever assembled on a science, tech- nology and commerce issue. America's religious leaders are united in their opposition to what they regard as a dangerous new federal government policy. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has ruled that the blueprints of life - the world's gene pool -- are patentable and can be treated as human inventions. Under the bizarre new government policy, genetically engineered animals and human genes, cells, organs and embryos can be owned by individual scientists and companies. In the brave new world of the U.S. Patent office, life has been redefined as a "manufacture or composition of matter." If a researcher implants a foreign gene into an animal's ge- netic code -- for example, a human growth hormone into a pig -- the genetically engineered animal is considered a human invention, like a computer, television or car. Similarly, if a scientist isolates and identifies the function of a human gene or cell-line, it becomes his exclusive property. By reducing life to the status of "human inventions," the Patent Office has, in effect, challenged the age-old belief that life on Earth is God's creation. The consequences of this new government policy are enor- mous and far-reaching, affecting the very meaning of life in the coming centuries. Parents across the USA ought to ask themselves whether their children will be better or worse off growing up in a world where they come to think of all of life, in- cluding the genetic building blocks of hu- man life, as mere inventions. By turning life into patented inventions, the govern- ment drains life of its intrinsic nature and sacred value. Inventions are merely instru- mental and driven by the logic of engineer- ing values -- including efficiency, utility, profitability and quantifiability. There is no place in the world of machines for love, empathy, stewardship, reverence and awe. The biotechnology industry argues that patents on life are essential to protect their investments and foster needed research into curing diseases, creating new drugs and improving agriculture. Nonsense. There are thousands of suc- cessful products on the market today, in- cluding drugs, medical procedures and farm products which are not "protected" by patents. A patent is simply the guarantee of an exclusive government monopoly to an individual or company to market an "invention" for a given number of years without having to fear competition by oth- er companies. While the biotech compa- nies might consider it heresy, the fact is that some things in life are more important than "monopolizing" profits. Life is more than a commodity. The blueprints of God's cre- ation should not be handed over to scien- tists and corporations just to make a fast buck in the marketplace. The question of whether life itself is to be regarded as a human invention or God's creation is one of the seminal issues of the coming age. If scientists and biotech com- panies are allowed to patent all of life, it could mean the final triumph of the values of the marketplace over the values of faith. Jeremy Rifkin is president of the Foundation on Economic Trends, Washington, D.C.