Charles Meyer <[log in to unmask]>:
>JASON,
>
>I wonder if this survey is starting out with a false basic assumption. You
>seem to have come to the conclusion that there is an increasing number of
>younger people developing PD or an increasing incidence in the general
>population (adjusted for age). I am not aware of any data available to base
>that conclusion. If you or anyone else is aware of data to support that
>please post it. It probably then would implicate something in the
>environment and the considerable speculation over the past few days
>regarding the different factors would especially be worth further
>investigation.
Charles, i am also responsible for the survey asking about the number of
people under 40 on the list who have PD. I'm just curious, and you make
valid points. Probably younger people have more 'Net access. And, the
ability to recognize PD symptoms has improved, resulting in more diagnoses
in younger people, though i do believe in my gut based on personal
experience and contacts (no science validity here) :-), that there has been
a rise in the number of younger people developing PD.
>There are a lot of possible reasons that there are more younger PD patients
>on the list. The younger group is substantially more computer literate and
>may still be working where we have increased contact and availability of the
>"information superhighway". The older population of PD patients tends to be
>more infirm and is less likely to be able to use a computer even if they had
>the skills. And, culturally younger people are less likely to accept their
>doctors word as the whole truth and question authority more.
>
>Also our awareness of PD among younger people is considerably hightened by
>the fact that we have it ourselves. My first reaction when my neurologist
>colleague made the diagnosis when I was 44 was "John, I'm only 44 how can I
>have PD". I had never heard of someone that young getting PD- and I am a
>physician. That was after I had seen another neurologist friend for a year
>who totally missed the diagnosis. Now, because I am aware of the
>possibility it seems like the incidence of PD especially among young people
>has gone through the roof in 6 years. I don't think it is the incidence as
>much as it is my awareness of the possibility.
>
>It is certainly valuable to speculate on causes but let us not get into the
>trap of generalizing from our own changing perceptions. Lets keep up the
>exchange of ideas but remember they have to be scientifically validated in
>the end. For instance, we cannot rule in or out the history of drug use as
>a contributing factor (except of course MTTP) on the basis of our data
>gathered here on the list but we certainly can come up with some ideas
>worthy of investigation.
>
>Let us keep up the atmosphere of free exchange of ideas on the list. As
>Barb Patterson says there is no place for "flaming" but let us be
>respectfully intellectually critical in our search for answers.
I agree, Charles, 100%. I respect your thoughts and concerns and did not
view them as a flame. :-)
>I am curious at people's responses to my ramblings. I will be arround over
>the next few days but Saturday I leave for vacation and will be "signed off"
>the net for 2-3 weeks beginning Friday or Saturday. And- looking forward to
>meeting Alesandro in Rome- a new friend I have made on the list.
>
>Au revoir & ciao
>
>Charlie
>****************************************************************************
>*************************************
> Charles T. Meyer
> Madison, WI
>
>[log in to unmask]
>****************************************************************************
>************************************
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Peace from the Clouds" \--*MH*--/
Jeffrey Romanyshyn Email: [log in to unmask]
"Mythic Hawk"
Poetry is for the soul, not the mind.
If you wish, please check out some of my poetry (written under the
psuedonym ROM CARPATHIAN) and other fine literary creations at the M. David
Lewis Enterprises HomePage at: http://www.mdle.com/
