--PART.BOUNDARY.0.23195.emout04.mail.aol.com.809155340 Content-ID: <[log in to unmask]> Content-type: text/plain I apologize for the length of this message, but I found it to be extremely interesting. Altho' it deals primarily with Alzheimers, PD is also mentioned, and alot of the info is relevant. WT ps BARB P. - have there been any listserv digests sent out recently - or should I check whether I've been cut off somehow? ************************************ > > --------------------- Forwarded message: From: [log in to unmask] (Tebay, Wendy) To: [log in to unmask] (athome) X-Note: Only the first 25K of this message is displayed. You can retrieve the entire text by selecting "Download." Date: 95-08-19 12:51:38 EDT Click here to ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Magazine: The Journal Of NIH Research Title: Alzheimer's Disease As A Model Of Molecular Gerontology Author: Allen D. Roses Issue: April 1995 Alzheimer's Disease As A Model Of Molecular Gerontology Allen D. Roses* Abstract: APOE4, a naturally occurring allele of the gene encoding apolipoprotein E (ApoE), increases the risk and lowers the age of developing late-onset Alzheimer's disease (AD). ApoE is the major apolipoprotein in the nervous system, and it may be necessary for the growth, maintenance, and repair of axonal membranes and myelin, the fatty sheath that surrounds axons. ApoE occurs in many cell types outside the central nervous system (CNS). Within the CNS, ApoE is expressed in astrocytes and is also located in smaller amounts in the cytoplasm of neurons in the cerebral cortex. My laboratory group has postulated that the E4 variant of ApoE may interact abnormally with neuronal cytoskeletal proteins such as tau, favoring microtubule degradation and the formation of neurofibrillary tangles, which occur in the brains of people with AD. In this commentary, I suggest that naturally occurring polymorphisms of genes other than APOE not only contribute to genetic diversity, but also may contribute to adult-onset diseases other than AD. In 1993, we reported that APOE4, a naturally occurring allele of the gene that encodes apolipoprotein E (ApoE), increases the susceptibility for developing late-onset Alzheimer's disease (AD)1-6. Since then, many other groups of investigators have confirmed the finding7-13. The impact of the APOE4 allele has become more obvious as people who are homozygous (APOE4/4) or heterozygous (APOE3/4) grow older and develop disease at a significantly faster rate than their counterparts who carry the APOE2 allele or are homozygous for APOE3 (APOE2/3, APOE2/4, or APOE3/3). Now, it is useful to stop and reflect on an interesting and obvious corollary. A polymorphic difference in a common gene, APOE, has a large influence on susceptibility to AD, a common late-onset disease3,4. APOE4 is not a mutant gene that causes AD. Instead, the APOE4 allele increases the risk and lowers the age of onset of developing AD--with APOE4 homozygotes at higher risk than heterozygotes. In contrast, the APOE2 allele appears to decrease the risk and increase the age of onset for AD. Although there are examples of statistically defined susceptibility factors in other diseases such as heart disease and cancer, the large genetic effect of the APOE4 allele on the increased rate of development of AD may forecast a common theme: Polymorphisms of other common genes may regulate the rate of disease expression over time in other late-onset neurological and nonneurological diseases. During the past decade, we have used many naturally occurring DNA polymorphisms as research tools to identify and locate genes associated with particular diseases and to map the human, mouse, and other genomes. Yet the biological effects of most polymorphisms have been virtually ignored as factors important for the phenotypic diversity of a species except when they are mutations for adisease. We tend to use the somewhat derogatory term "housekeeping genes" for those genes that are expressed in many tissues (constituitively) and apparently are necessary for sustaining all cell types--as if these genes are less important than other, more interesting, organ-specific genes (sometimes called "luxury genes"). Many widely expressed genes have polymorphic forms. APOE, the gene for Huntington's disease, and many other genes are expressed in most tissues and may play a key role in the rate of development of late-onset diseases14-16. In essence, the polymorphisms at the APOE locus on chromosome 19 determine the rate of disease development and the age of clinical onset of AD. I believe there are two important lessons to be learned independent of the specific role of ApoE in AD. First, different protein isoforms expressed from polymorphic alleles may have slightly altered function, with cumulative effects as people age. This alteration could lead to variable rates of disease onset. It is well accepted that during embryogenesis, many genes are transiently expressed and are involved in different stages of the maturation of the organism. Understanding the regulation of gene expression has, therefore, become an important problem in developmental biology. However, adults continue to mature because of other mechanisms that generate genetic diversity. We are now on the threshold of dissecting not only the genetic diversity that contributes to adult-onset diseases, but also of identifying factors that may underlie biological differences among interactions between humans and their environment. The relationship between APOE polymorphisms and AD was less important when people did not live more than 70 years and AD was a less prevalent disease. But now that we have extended our lifespans, we have also uncovered new limitations that previously were not subjected to evolutionary pressures or natural selection. The same APOE4 allele that increases our age-dependent risk of AD must also convey some selective advantage over the other variants of APOE to maintain itself in more primitive populations, including the western Australian aboriginees, Fore tribesmen of New Guinea, and Yanomami Indians of northwestern Brazil17,18. The second important observation affects basic neurobiology and emerges from the sudden focus of attention on ApoE as a factor in brain metabolism of AD. There is no evidence that ApoE is expressed in brain neurons and, therefore, the conclusion is that ApoE is not involved in intraneuronal metabolism. This belief generated immediate and repeated criticism of our suggestion in 1994 that ApoE3 and ApoE4 interact differently with microtubule-associated proteins (MAP2 or tau) in neurons in the cerebral cortex. If ApoE does not get into the neuronal cytoplasm, the reasoning went, then interactions with the cytoskeletal proteins MAP2 or tau would be in vitro artifacts without biological significance. But our recent detection of ApoE in the cytoplasm of normal cortical neurons as well as its accepted high concentration in astrocytes creates questions about its normal metabolic function (discussed below) and raises an interesting and paradoxical scenario19. AD involves the brain, and the disease is characterized by the loss of synaptic density and cortical neurons. APOE, the relevant genetic factor, encodes a 34-kilodalton glycoprotein whose mRNA is not known to be expressed in neurons. Therefore, there must be specific mechanisms for neurons to take up extracellular or astrocyte-secreted ApoE. Different isoforms of a protein that are not made in neurons can nevertheless have a profound effect on the viability of neurons. Therefore, gene expression in neurons is not equivalent to disease expression involving neurons. This is a critical concept that is relevant to many current experiments that attempt to identify organ-specific candidate genes as the site of mutations that lead to disease of that organ. Many brain diseases have been assumed to involve genes uniquely expressed in the brain. In fact, in most cases, the mutated gene is widely expressed but its clinical effect on late-onset degeneration appears specific to certain subsets of neurons14-16,20-24. When does a normal genetic trait become a disease gene? A genetic trait can be defined as an inherited variable. A disease is a morbid constellation of symptoms and signs. Some traits are benign throughout life, but increased longevity may provide the opportunity for the effect of other traits to contribute to the development of a disease. We are now at the threshold of differentiating a disease process from a genetic variability of neuronal aging. Figure 1 illustrates the distribution of the age of onset of AD in 72 families with late-onset inherited disease and 198 control subjects (with sporadic AD) as a function of the five commonly inherited APOE genotypes5. (APOE2/2 represents less than 0.05 percent of the U.S. population, and there were not enough data to include it in the figure.) With the caveat that the APOE4 effect actually starts before 60 years of age12,13, Figure 1 represents the relationship between APOE polymorphisms and the age of onset of AD. The prevalence of AD in a population depends on the relative APOE allele frequencies, the longevity of the society, and perhaps ethnic and/or racial genetic differences in other susceptibility genes. Several points are readily apparent from these data. The mean age of onset for individuals in the population with the APOE4/4 genotype (approximately 2 percent of the population) is less than 70 years of age; for APOE2/3 individuals (approximately 10 percent of the population), it is more than 90 years of age. The mean age of onset for APOE3/4 individuals (approximately 20 percent of the population) is in the mid-70s. Thus, a difference in the APOE genotype alone stratifies the distribution of age of onset of AD, with a mean difference of more than 20 years. There is another fascinating point that can be appreciated from Figure 1. Even with the "best" genotype, APOE2/3, everyone would get AD if they lived to 140 years. So what is the relationship of APOE polymorphisms to "aging"? Other studies of the associations of APOE alleles with longevity have approached this question in reverse, but with the same general results. In a 1994 study of 338 French centenarians, Schachter et al.2 found that the allele frequency of APOE2 in the centenarians was double that of a non-aged French control group (0.068 to 0.1280) and that the allele frequency of APOE4 was about half (0.112 to 0.052). The relative proportions of APOE alleles remaining in the centenarians could be approximated by using Figure 1 to estimate the alleles left in the population at age 100. There are several possible interpretations for these data. The most obvious is that the process of AD occurs in everyone at a rate influenced by their APOE genotype. A genetic trait becomes a susceptibility gene for a disease when the individuals at risk survive long enough for the disease to be expressed. APOE4 increases risk and lowers the mean age of onset of AD. In contrast, APOE2 appears to protect against AD until well past current human lifespans. We are living longer today than at any previous time in human history. Genetic traits that are beneficial earlier in life may be selected for during the first 50 years but may generate difficulties in old age. Thus, time is the variable that has changed most significantly and that has led to the current epidemic of AD. APOE may be a particularly important genetic locus for dissecting age- or time-related metabolic processes that occur in late adult life; the APOE gene may be a window on molecular gerontology. Clinicians traditionally measure the duration of disease as dating from the apparent age of onset. Of course, we realize that the disease processes may start years before we observe the resulting morbidity. Using sophisticated laboratory and imaging techniques, we attempt to identify markers of disease prior to the actual appearance of clinical symptoms26. In fact, late-onset diseases may well start before development ceases. They may involve a lifelong process that manifests itself only when signs and symptoms develop. Late-onset AD is just such a disease. Two decades ago, when the expected age of survival was about 67 years in men and 72 years in women, AD was relatively uncommon. But with increased longevity, processes leading to disease that need more time to develop begin to appear. An isoform-specific effect of a protein (such as ApoE) on the distribution of the age of onset of a disease would go unnoticed without the effect of longer survival. In fact, in primitive populations where the allele frequency of APOE4 approaches the 0.4 level, which is frequently observed with AD, the individuals in the population do not live long enough to develop late-onset disease. For example, the allele frequency of APOE4 is 0.39 in western Australian aborigines, yet there have been only rare autopsies in aborigines over the age of 56, and none of these people had developed AD. These autopsies have been performed during the past 30 years at the Royal Perth Hospital Department of Neuropathology (Byron Kakulas, personal communication, 1994)18. Other diseases that demonstrate time-dependent onset may not develop at a linear rate, but may accelerate over time. For example, Stanley Prusiner and his colleagues have demonstrated that the relatively rare prion diseases--Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD), Kuru, and Gerstman-Schenker-Straussler disease--represent a degenerative neuropathy that may result from an accumulation of the beta-pleated-sheet form of the prion protein in affected brain regions. The lead time for the conversion of prion protein from its normal alpha-helix structure to the beta-pleated-sheet conformation may progress slowly for many years, and accelerate as more of the (beta}-pleated sheet form accumulates20,27. But the infectious nature of the prion diseases also illustrates a mechanism for reducing the time that it takes for the transition to occur: Transmission of prions can provide protein aggregates that serve as a seeding function for beta-sheet formation. Once symptoms develop, the disease course appears to accelerate rapidly, almost resembling a log function for the relationship of disease to time. Triplet-repeat diseases, such as Huntington's disease, dentato-rubropallidal-luyisan atrophy (DRPLA), and myotonic muscular dystrophy, also suggest a mechanism for regulating the age of onset and the apparent severity of disease14-16,20-24,28,29. Several genes are known to have variable numbers of trinucleotide repeats that, when larger than the normal range, can be associated with variable age of onset diseases. If the rate of disease development is proportional to the size of the DNA triplet repeats, then mildly affected patients who carry small numbers of repeats and develop initial symptoms late in life could never be followed long enough to develop the full range of disease that develops over decades. Larger numbers of triplet repeats catalyze the rate of disease so that the disease starts earlier and can proceed through a longer course of signs and symptoms. It is important to understand the role of ApoE and its normally occurring variants in neuronal metabolism. It is here that the study of the genetics has delineated a new area of neurobiology. From a practical point of view, the definition of AD as a universal result of aging could lead to an important therapeutic strategy. It may be possible to use drugs to mimic the protective mechanisms of the ApoE2 isoform and thus extend the distribution of age of onset of AD, which is equivalent to delaying the disease by 20+ years30. What might happen after age 100 is of little practical concern because only a small percentage of the population is likely to survive that long. The phenotypes of AD can be explained by APOE genotype and time. The literature frequently refers to the phenotypic manifestations of AD, beta-amyloid (A-beta) plaques and neurofibrillary tangles, as though they are relatively invariable. In fact, the brains of people with AD typically have great variations in their A-beta load. Nevertheless, some investigators propose that A-beta fibril formation is the central factor in the development of AD31,32. In the rare beta-PP717 mutation form of the disease, a transgenic mouse model for increased beta-PP (amyloid precursor protein) and A-beta production can lead to amyloid plaques and associated gliosis33. Currently, there is no evidence of behavioral abnormalities--dementia of AD--in these mice. Whether this mechanism operates in beta-PP717 AD is uncertain because there is no current evidence for increased A-beta deposition in patients with this mutation. Late-onset AD, without beta-PP mutations, may have a wholly distinct pathogenesis. We generally assume that the same plaques contain A-beta protein as well as ApoE. Many investigators would be surprised to find that immunostained serial sections from the cerebral cortices of AD patients may show both processes, although not necessarily in the same plaques34. In fact, it was during such studies that we noted ApoE immunoreactivity in cortical neurons in addition to plaques, blood vessels, and glia. We also found that the density of immunostained A-beta protein (amyloid load) is related to different APOE genotypes and to the duration of disease from clinical onset to death. This evidence suggests that the isoforms of ApoE affect the rate of deposition of amyloid and the apparent amyloid load at autopsy9,35. Adjacent sections of brain from patients with AD stained with multiple antibodies can illustrate interesting differences. For example, fully formed plaques have prominent A-beta immunoreactivity, but ApoE immunoreactivity may be observed in some plaques when A-beta staining is not observed. Without rehashing various theories of AD pathogenesis, suffice it to say that ApoE can occur in neuritic plaques early in their formation, whereas A-beta deposition typically becomes greater with time as a function of the type of ApoE that an individual produces: ApoE4 > ApoE3 > ApoE2. Thus, when we compare microscopic sections of brain from AD patients and from controls for their APOE genotype and the length of AD disease between onset and death, we can account for the large differences in A-beta load that others have reported. Although the A-beta plaque deposition in AD is overwhelming and impressive, its variability can be explained by the presence of specific ApoE isoforms. Therefore, the phenotype is consistent with and dependent on the genotype5. Similar mutant genotypes may lead to diverse disease phenotypes. Historically, diseases have been named and classified by their clinical symptoms and characteristic pathology. If there is one dramatic consequence of the molecular genetic revolution on contemporary studies of disease, it is the extreme variations in phenotype that can come from similar genetic lesions. Perhaps the most striking examples to date are the divergent phenotypes that result from nearly identical PRPP178 mutations. This mutant prion gene can cause either CJD or fatal familial insomnia (FFI), two distinctly different fatal phenotypes21,36. It appears that a small change in DNA sequence--a polymorphism at codon 129--dictates the phenotype. (Although the prion protein can aggregate and form amyloid plaques, neither PRPP178 disease, CJD, or FFI is characterized by prominent plaque formation.) Another example of similar genotypes and diverse phenotypes is DRPLA22-24. A triplet-repeat variation in the same gene causes one set of disease symptoms in the Japanese cases, which are clinically distinct from the disease manifestations in African Americans, again pointing to the large phenotypic effects of small variations in the genetic background. My view of the future for the study of AD is that, by understanding how different isoforms of ApoE participate in neuronal metabolism and the mechanisms of pathogenesis that lead to the synaptic and neuronal loss characteristic of AD, we can decipher other principles of cerebral pathology and processes that are currently undefined14-16,20-24,37. ApoE may be the "vitamin C" of neurons. As stated above, ApoE is present in neurons of patients with late-onset AD and in age-matched controls who do not have AD19,34 (see figure 3). Although ApoE is made in large quantities outside the CNS, where it contributes to bulk lipid metabolism, the quantity of ApoE that is present in brain neurons is infinitesimal compared with the quantity in glial cells19,38,39. ApoE appears not to be made in neurons, but neurons probably acquire the protein from astrocytes and require its presence. There must be a currently undefined, neuron-specific mechanism that allows small amounts of ApoE--once it is inside a neuron--to escape the intraneuronal endosomal compartment and enter the cytoplasm. APOE-deficient knockout mice develop early and severe abnormalities in the morphology of their cortical-neuron dendrites, presumably as a consequence of having no ApoE in their brains40. Thus, ApoE is similar to a vitamin, such as vitamin C, in human physiology: The neuron does not make it but it is necessary for good health. Our recent studies suggest that the ApoE3 and ApoE2 isoforms may lead to better brain function over time than ApoE4. Studies of fraternal twins have revealed lower cognitive performance in normal (non-AD) older adult male twins who carry the APOE4 allele41. Also, a person's ability to recover neuropsychological functions after stress, such as cardiopulmonary bypass surgery, has been related to the presence or absence of an APOE4 allele42. The neurobiology and hereditary factors that underlie neuropsychological functioning and responses to environmental stress are only beginning to be appreciated and studied. The normal metabolic role of small quantities of cytoplasmic ApoE in neurons and the pathways for regulating the neuronal intake of ApoE may provide new clues to the study of normal brain function and response to metabolic stresses5,42. ApoE seems to function as a neuronal metabolic co-factor for microtubular maintenance and repair and, possibly, for other physiologic functions, and it may play akey role in the selective vulnerability that characterizes some neurodegenerative diseases. The intriguing localization of ApoE to peroxisomes may suggest that oxygen metabolism is altered in several major neurodegenerative diseases, including amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, and the collection of disorders that resemble AD but that involve different brain pathologies17,43. It is natural that the impetus for these basic studies should come from scientists who are interested in the nature of diseases and the possibilities for treatment. The studies of genes that increase susceptibility to disease will need to be verified by epidemiological studies controlled for age, sex, race, and ethnic variables. The association of the APOE4 allele with more rapid progression to late-onset AD is a wonderful example of how a previously known genetic variation that can increase the susceptibility to fatal myocardial infarctions can be extended to another age-dependent disease44. To understand the epidemiology of diseases in different populations with variable frequencies of the APOE alleles, we must focus our attention on the effects of genetic variations as well as of interactions with diet, exercise habits, education, and other environmental factors on the rate of disease expression. Crystal balls do not provide as much light as do data from experiments. Although this commentary may sound speculative, there is nothing more conjectural than being asked to write about the future. I think basic neurobiologists will lead the way in determining the role of ApoE in neurons and that this information will feed back to investigators who are interested in brain diseases. The ApoE-isoform-specific metabolism that --PART.BOUNDARY.0.23195.emout04.mail.aol.com.809155340 Content-ID: <[log in to unmask]> Content-type: text/plain; name="apolipro.txt" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From [log in to unmask] Sat Aug 19 12:50:32 1995 Return-Path: [log in to unmask] Received: from everest.den.mmc.com (everest.den.mmc.com [160.205.27.1]) b= y mail03.mail.aol.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id MAA09214 for <RosaBosa= @aol.com>; Sat, 19 Aug 1995 12:50:25 -0400 Received: from by everest.den.mmc.com (4.1/1.34.a) id AB07945; Sat, 19 Aug 95 10:49:54 MDT Received: by claven.den.mmc.com; Sat, 19 Aug 95 10:50:30 -0700 X400-Received: by /c=3Dus/admd=3Dtelemail/prmd=3Dmmc/; Relayed; = 19 Aug 95 10:50:28 -0700 X400-Received: by mta mmagMTA in /c=3Dus/admd=3Dtelemail/prmd=3Dmmc/; Rel= ayed; = 19 Aug 95 10:50:28 -0700 X400-Mts-Identifier: [/c=3Dus/admd=3Dtelemail/prmd=3Dmmc/; 05E37303616540= 01-mmagMTA] Content-Identifier: 05E3730361654001 Content-Return: Allowed X400-Content-Type: P2-1988 ( 22 ) Conversion: Allowed Original-Encoded-Information-Types: Undefined, IA5-Text Priority: normal Disclose-Recipients: Prohibited Alternate-Recipient: Allowed X400-Originator: [log in to unmask] X400-Recipients: non-disclosure; Message-Id: <05E3730361654001*/c=3Dus/admd=3Dtelemail/prmd=3Dmmc/o=3Dde= n/ou=3Dmsmailmac/s=3DTebay/g=3DWendy/@MHS> Date: 19 Aug 95 10:50:28 -0700 From: "Tebay, Wendy" <[log in to unmask]> To: "athome" <[log in to unmask]> (Return requested) Subject: apoliprotein Click here to ---------------------------------------------------------------------= --- Magazine: The Journal Of NIH Research Title: Alzheimer's Disease As A Mod= el Of Molecular Gerontology Author: Allen D. Roses Issue: April 1995 Alzheimer's Disease As A Model Of Molecular Gerontology Allen D. Roses* Abstract: APOE4, a naturally occurring allele of the gene encoding apolipoprotein E (ApoE), increases the risk and lowers the age of developing late-onset Alzheimer's disease (AD). ApoE is the major apolipoprotein in the nervous system, and it may be necessary for the growth, maintenance, and repair of axonal membranes and myelin, the fatty= sheath that surrounds axons. ApoE occurs in many cell types outside the central nervous system (CNS). Within the CNS, ApoE is expressed in astrocytes and is also located in smaller amounts in the cytoplasm of neurons in the cerebral cortex. My laboratory group has postulated that t= he E4 variant of ApoE may interact abnormally with neuronal cytoskeletal proteins such as tau, favoring microtubule degradation and the formation = of neurofibrillary tangles, which occur in the brains of people with AD. In this commentary, I suggest that naturally occurring polymorphisms of gene= s other than APOE not only contribute to genetic diversity, but also may contribute to adult-onset diseases other than AD. In 1993, we reported that APOE4, a naturally occurring allele of the gene= that encodes apolipoprotein E (ApoE), increases the susceptibility for developing late-onset Alzheimer's disease (AD)1-6. Since then, many other= groups of investigators have confirmed the finding7-13. The impact of the= APOE4 allele has become more obvious as people who are homozygous (APOE4/= 4) or heterozygous (APOE3/4) grow older and develop disease at a significant= ly faster rate than their counterparts who carry the APOE2 allele or are homozygous for APOE3 (APOE2/3, APOE2/4, or APOE3/3). Now, it is useful to stop and reflect on an interesting and obvious corollary. A polymorphic difference in a common gene, APOE, has a large influence on susceptibility to AD, a common late-onset disease3,4. APOE4 = is not a mutant gene that causes AD. Instead, the APOE4 allele increases the= risk and lowers the age of onset of developing AD--with APOE4 homozygotes= at higher risk than heterozygotes. In contrast, the APOE2 allele appears = to decrease the risk and increase the age of onset for AD. Although there are examples of statistically defined susceptibility facto= rs in other diseases such as heart disease and cancer, the large genetic effect of the APOE4 allele on the increased rate of development of AD may= forecast a common theme: Polymorphisms of other common genes may regulate= the rate of disease expression over time in other late-onset neurological= and nonneurological diseases. During the past decade, we have used many naturally occurring DNA polymorphisms as research tools to identify and locate genes associated with particular diseases and to map the human, mouse, and other genomes. Yet the biological effects of most polymorphisms have been virtually ignored as factors important for the phenotypic diversity of a species except when they are mutations for adisease. We tend to use the somewhat derogatory term "housekeeping genes" for those genes that are expressed i= n many tissues (constituitively) and apparently are necessary for sustainin= g all cell types--as if these genes are less important than other, more interesting, organ-specific genes (sometimes called "luxury genes"). Many= widely expressed genes have polymorphic forms. APOE, the gene for Huntington's disease, and many other genes are expressed in most tissues and may play a key role in the rate of development of late-onset diseases14-16. In essence, the polymorphisms at the APOE locus on chromosome 19 determine the rate of disease development and the age of clinical onset of AD. I believe there are two important lessons to be learned independent of the specific role of ApoE in AD. First, different protein isoforms expressed from polymorphic alleles may have slightly altered function, with cumulative effects as people age. Th= is alteration could lead to variable rates of disease onset. It is well accepted that during embryogenesis, many genes are transiently expressed and are involved in different stages of the maturation of the organism. Understanding the regulation of gene expression has, therefore, become an= important problem in developmental biology. However, adults continue to mature because of other mechanisms that generate genetic diversity. We ar= e now on the threshold of dissecting not only the genetic diversity that contributes to adult-onset diseases, but also of identifying factors that= may underlie biological differences among interactions between humans and= their environment. The relationship between APOE polymorphisms and AD was less important whe= n people did not live more than 70 years and AD was a less prevalent diseas= e. But now that we have extended our lifespans, we have also uncovered new limitations that previously were not subjected to evolutionary pressures = or natural selection. The same APOE4 allele that increases our age-dependent= risk of AD must also convey some selective advantage over the other variants of APOE to maintain itself in more primitive populations, including the western Australian aboriginees, Fore tribesmen of New Guine= a, and Yanomami Indians of northwestern Brazil17,18. The second important observation affects basic neurobiology and emerges from the sudden focus of attention on ApoE as a factor in brain metabolis= m of AD. There is no evidence that ApoE is expressed in brain neurons and, therefore, the conclusion is that ApoE is not involved in intraneuronal metabolism. This belief generated immediate and repeated criticism of our= suggestion in 1994 that ApoE3 and ApoE4 interact differently with microtubule-associated proteins (MAP2 or tau) in neurons in the cerebral cortex. If ApoE does not get into the neuronal cytoplasm, the reasoning went, then interactions with the cytoskeletal proteins MAP2 or tau would = be in vitro artifacts without biological significance. But our recent detection of ApoE in the cytoplasm of normal cortical neurons as well as its accepted high concentration in astrocytes creates questions about its= normal metabolic function (discussed below) and raises an interesting and= paradoxical scenario19. AD involves the brain, and the disease is characterized by the loss of synaptic density and cortical neurons. APOE, the relevant genetic factor,= encodes a 34-kilodalton glycoprotein whose mRNA is not known to be expressed in neurons. Therefore, there must be specific mechanisms for neurons to take up extracellular or astrocyte-secreted ApoE. Different isoforms of a protein that are not made in neurons can nevertheless have = a profound effect on the viability of neurons. Therefore, gene expression i= n neurons is not equivalent to disease expression involving neurons. This i= s a critical concept that is relevant to many current experiments that attempt to identify organ-specific candidate genes as the site of mutatio= ns that lead to disease of that organ. Many brain diseases have been assumed= to involve genes uniquely expressed in the brain. In fact, in most cases,= the mutated gene is widely expressed but its clinical effect on late-onse= t degeneration appears specific to certain subsets of neurons14-16,20-24. When does a normal genetic trait become a disease gene? A genetic trait can be defined as an inherited variable. A disease is a morbid constellation of symptoms and signs. Some traits are benign throughout life, but increased longevity may provide the opportunity for the effect of other traits to contribute to the development of a disease.= We are now at the threshold of differentiating a disease process from a genetic variability of neuronal aging. Figure 1 illustrates the distribution of the age of onset of AD in 72 families with late-onset inherited disease and 198 control subjects (with= sporadic AD) as a function of the five commonly inherited APOE genotypes5= =2E (APOE2/2 represents less than 0.05 percent of the U.S. population, and there were not enough data to include it in the figure.) With the caveat that the APOE4 effect actually starts before 60 years of age12,13, Figure= 1 represents the relationship between APOE polymorphisms and the age of ons= et of AD. The prevalence of AD in a population depends on the relative APOE allele frequencies, the longevity of the society, and perhaps ethnic and/= or racial genetic differences in other susceptibility genes. Several points are readily apparent from these data. The mean age of onse= t for individuals in the population with the APOE4/4 genotype (approximatel= y 2 percent of the population) is less than 70 years of age; for APOE2/3 individuals (approximately 10 percent of the population), it is more than= 90 years of age. The mean age of onset for APOE3/4 individuals (approximately 20 percent of the population) is in the mid-70s. Thus, a difference in the APOE genotype alone stratifies the distribution of age = of onset of AD, with a mean difference of more than 20 years. There is another fascinating point that can be appreciated from Figure 1.= Even with the "best" genotype, APOE2/3, everyone would get AD if they liv= ed to 140 years. So what is the relationship of APOE polymorphisms to "aging= "? Other studies of the associations of APOE alleles with longevity have approached this question in reverse, but with the same general results. In a 1994 study of 338 French centenarians, Schachter et al.2 found that the allele frequency of APOE2 in the centenarians was double that of a non-aged French control group (0.068 to 0.1280) and that the allele frequency of APOE4 was about half (0.112 to 0.052). The relative proportions of APOE alleles remaining in the centenarians could be approximated by using Figure 1 to estimate the alleles left in the population at age 100. There are several possible interpretations for these data. The most obvio= us is that the process of AD occurs in everyone at a rate influenced by thei= r APOE genotype. A genetic trait becomes a susceptibility gene for a diseas= e when the individuals at risk survive long enough for the disease to be expressed. APOE4 increases risk and lowers the mean age of onset of AD. I= n contrast, APOE2 appears to protect against AD until well past current hum= an lifespans. We are living longer today than at any previous time in human history. Genetic traits that are beneficial earlier in life may be select= ed for during the first 50 years but may generate difficulties in old age. Thus, time is the variable that has changed most significantly and that h= as led to the current epidemic of AD. APOE may be a particularly important genetic locus for dissecting age- or time-related metabolic processes tha= t occur in late adult life; the APOE gene may be a window on molecular gerontology. Clinicians traditionally measure the duration of disease as dating from t= he apparent age of onset. Of course, we realize that the disease processes m= ay start years before we observe the resulting morbidity. Using sophisticate= d laboratory and imaging techniques, we attempt to identify markers of disease prior to the actual appearance of clinical symptoms26. In fact, late-onset diseases may well start before development ceases. They may involve a lifelong process that manifests itself only when signs and symptoms develop. Late-onset AD is just such a disease. Two decades ago, when the expected age of survival was about 67 years in men and 72 years in women, AD was relatively uncommon. But with increased= longevity, processes leading to disease that need more time to develop begin to appear. An isoform-specific effect of a protein (such as ApoE) o= n the distribution of the age of onset of a disease would go unnoticed without the effect of longer survival. In fact, in primitive populations where the allele frequency of APOE4 approaches the 0.4 level, which is frequently observed with AD, the individuals in the population do not liv= e long enough to develop late-onset disease. For example, the allele frequency of APOE4 is 0.39 in western Australian aborigines, yet there ha= ve been only rare autopsies in aborigines over the age of 56, and none of these people had developed AD. These autopsies have been performed during= the past 30 years at the Royal Perth Hospital Department of Neuropatholog= y (Byron Kakulas, personal communication, 1994)18. Other diseases that demonstrate time-dependent onset may not develop at a= linear rate, but may accelerate over time. For example, Stanley Prusiner and his colleagues have demonstrated that the relatively rare prion diseases--Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD), Kuru, and Gerstman-Schenker-Straussler disease--represent a degenerative neuropathy= that may result from an accumulation of the beta-pleated-sheet form of th= e prion protein in affected brain regions. The lead time for the conversion= of prion protein from its normal alpha-helix structure to the beta-pleated-sheet conformation may progress slowly for many years, and accelerate as more of the (beta}-pleated sheet form accumulates20,27. But= the infectious nature of the prion diseases also illustrates a mechanism for reducing the time that it takes for the transition to occur: Transmission of prions can provide protein aggregates that serve as a seeding function for beta-sheet formation. Once symptoms develop, the disease course appears to accelerate rapidly, almost resembling a log function for the relationship of disease to time. Triplet-repeat diseases, such as Huntington's disease, dentato-rubropallidal-luyisan atrophy (DRPLA), and myotonic muscular dystrophy, also suggest a mechanism for regulating the age of onset and t= he apparent severity of disease14-16,20-24,28,29. Several genes are known to= have variable numbers of trinucleotide repeats that, when larger than the= normal range, can be associated with variable age of onset diseases. If t= he rate of disease development is proportional to the size of the DNA triple= t repeats, then mildly affected patients who carry small numbers of repeats= and develop initial symptoms late in life could never be followed long enough to develop the full range of disease that develops over decades. Larger numbers of triplet repeats catalyze the rate of disease so that th= e disease starts earlier and can proceed through a longer course of signs a= nd symptoms. It is important to understand the role of ApoE and its normally occurring= variants in neuronal metabolism. It is here that the study of the genetic= s has delineated a new area of neurobiology. From a practical point of view= , the definition of AD as a universal result of aging could lead to an important therapeutic strategy. It may be possible to use drugs to mimic the protective mechanisms of the ApoE2 isoform and thus extend the distribution of age of onset of AD, which is equivalent to delaying the disease by 20+ years30. What might happen after age 100 is of little practical concern because only a small percentage of the population is likely to survive that long. The phenotypes of AD can be explained by APOE genotype and time. The literature frequently refers to the phenotypic manifestations of AD, beta-amyloid (A-beta) plaques and neurofibrillary tangles, as though they= are relatively invariable. In fact, the brains of people with AD typicall= y have great variations in their A-beta load. Nevertheless, some investigators propose that A-beta fibril formation is the central factor = in the development of AD31,32. In the rare beta-PP717 mutation form of the disease, a transgenic mouse model for increased beta-PP (amyloid precurso= r protein) and A-beta production can lead to amyloid plaques and associated= gliosis33. Currently, there is no evidence of behavioral abnormalities--dementia of AD--in these mice. Whether this mechanism operates in beta-PP717 AD is uncertain because there is no current eviden= ce for increased A-beta deposition in patients with this mutation. Late-onse= t AD, without beta-PP mutations, may have a wholly distinct pathogenesis. W= e generally assume that the same plaques contain A-beta protein as well as ApoE. Many investigators would be surprised to find that immunostained serial sections from the cerebral cortices of AD patients may show both processes, although not necessarily in the same plaques34. In fact, it wa= s during such studies that we noted ApoE immunoreactivity in cortical neuro= ns in addition to plaques, blood vessels, and glia. We also found that the density of immunostained A-beta protein (amyloid load) is related to different APOE genotypes and to the duration of disease from clinical ons= et to death. This evidence suggests that the isoforms of ApoE affect the rate of deposition of amyloid and the apparent amyloid load at autopsy9,35. Adjacent sections of brain from patients with AD stained with multiple antibodies can illustrate interesting differences. For example, fully formed plaques have prominent A-beta immunoreactivity, but ApoE immunoreactivity may be observed in some plaques when A-beta staining is not observed. Without rehashing various theories of AD pathogenesis, suffice it to say that ApoE can occur in neuritic plaques early in their formation, whereas= A-beta deposition typically becomes greater with time as a function of th= e type of ApoE that an individual produces: ApoE4 > ApoE3 > ApoE2. Thus, wh= en we compare microscopic sections of brain from AD patients and from contro= ls for their APOE genotype and the length of AD disease between onset and death, we can account for the large differences in A-beta load that other= s have reported. Although the A-beta plaque deposition in AD is overwhelmin= g and impressive, its variability can be explained by the presence of specific ApoE isoforms. Therefore, the phenotype is consistent with and dependent on the genotype5. Similar mutant genotypes may lead to diverse disease phenotypes. Historically, diseases have been named and classified by their clinical symptoms and characteristic pathology. If there is one dramatic consequen= ce of the molecular genetic revolution on contemporary studies of disease, i= t is the extreme variations in phenotype that can come from similar genetic= lesions. Perhaps the most striking examples to date are the divergent phenotypes that result from nearly identical PRPP178 mutations. This muta= nt prion gene can cause either CJD or fatal familial insomnia (FFI), two distinctly different fatal phenotypes21,36. It appears that a small chang= e in DNA sequence--a polymorphism at codon 129--dictates the phenotype. (Although the prion protein can aggregate and form amyloid plaques, neith= er PRPP178 disease, CJD, or FFI is characterized by prominent plaque formation.) Another example of similar genotypes and diverse phenotypes is DRPLA22-24= =2E A triplet-repeat variation in the same gene causes one set of disease symptoms in the Japanese cases, which are clinically distinct from the disease manifestations in African Americans, again pointing to the large phenotypic effects of small variations in the genetic background. My view of the future for the study of AD is that, by understanding how different isoforms of ApoE participate in neuronal metabolism and the mechanisms of pathogenesis that lead to the synaptic and neuronal loss characteristic of AD, we can decipher other principles of cerebral pathology and processes that are currently undefined14-16,20-24,37. ApoE may be the "vitamin C" of neurons. As stated above, ApoE is present in neurons of patients with late-onset A= D and in age-matched controls who do not have AD19,34 (see figure 3). Although ApoE is made in large quantities outside the CNS, where it contributes to bulk lipid metabolism, the quantity of ApoE that is presen= t in brain neurons is infinitesimal compared with the quantity in glial cells19,38,39. ApoE appears not to be made in neurons, but neurons probably acquire the protein from astrocytes and require its presence. There must be a current= ly undefined, neuron-specific mechanism that allows small amounts of ApoE--once it is inside a neuron--to escape the intraneuronal endosomal compartment and enter the cytoplasm. APOE-deficient knockout mice develop= early and severe abnormalities in the morphology of their cortical-neuron= dendrites, presumably as a consequence of having no ApoE in their brains4= 0. Thus, ApoE is similar to a vitamin, such as vitamin C, in human physiolog= y: The neuron does not make it but it is necessary for good health. Our recent studies suggest that the ApoE3 and ApoE2 isoforms may lead to better brain function over time than ApoE4. Studies of fraternal twins ha= ve revealed lower cognitive performance in normal (non-AD) older adult male twins who carry the APOE4 allele41. Also, a person's ability to recover neuropsychological functions after stress, such as cardiopulmonary bypass= surgery, has been related to the presence or absence of an APOE4 allele42= =2E The neurobiology and hereditary factors that underlie neuropsychological functioning and responses to environmental stress are only beginning to b= e appreciated and studied. The normal metabolic role of small quantities of= cytoplasmic ApoE in neurons and the pathways for regulating the neuronal intake of ApoE may provide new clues to the study of normal brain functio= n and response to metabolic stresses5,42. ApoE seems to function as a neuronal metabolic co-factor for microtubular= maintenance and repair and, possibly, for other physiologic functions, an= d it may play akey role in the selective vulnerability that characterizes some neurodegenerative diseases. The intriguing localization of ApoE to peroxisomes may suggest that oxygen metabolism is altered in several majo= r neurodegenerative diseases, including amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, and the collection of disorders that resemble AD but= that involve different brain pathologies17,43. It is natural that the impetus for these basic studies should come from scientists who are interested in the nature of diseases and the possibilities for treatment. The studies of genes that increase susceptibility to disease will need to be verified by epidemiological studies controlled for age, sex, race, and ethnic variables. The association of the APOE4 allele with more rapid progression to late-onset= AD is a wonderful example of how a previously known genetic variation tha= t can increase the susceptibility to fatal myocardial infarctions can be extended to another age-dependent disease44. To understand the epidemiolo= gy of diseases in different populations with variable frequencies of the APO= E alleles, we must focus our attention on the effects of genetic variations= as well as of interactions with diet, exercise habits, education, and oth= er environmental factors on the rate of disease expression. Crystal balls do not provide as much light as do data from experiments. Although this commentary may sound speculative, there is nothing more conjectural than being asked to write about the future. I think basic neurobiologists will lead the way in determining the role of ApoE in neurons and that this information will feed back to investigators who are= interested in brain diseases. The ApoE-isoform-specific metabolism that leads to AD will be defined and targeted for pharmacologic therapy. As a "long-shot" bet, many of my colleagues in AD research who are firmly engrossed in studying the role of A-beta in AD may come to understand tha= t an individual's genotype explains his or her phenotype, not that phenotyp= e predicts mechanisms of pathogenesis. The concept of several "Alzheimer's diseases" will become more apparent; whether and how they are interrelate= d will be tested45. Being somewhat of agambler, my "surest bet" is that new= concepts of basic science of the brain will emerge from controversial dat= a that cannot now be explained by prevailing hypotheses. If AD is a universal corollary of long life with variations in APOE genotype being responsible for the proportion of individuals who will develop AD during their life span, then nothing needs to be replaced by gene therapy. Indeed, we need to enhance or inhibit by 10-15 percent the rate of relevant critical reactions to push the curve of age of AD onset = to the right. If genotype does predict phenotype, then we must describe the genetically relevant mechanisms that are specifically affected by differe= nt ApoE isoforms--and then determine how to slow the processes down. The AD drugs of the future will target genetically relevant processes, rather th= an the phenotypic consequences of the disease. Acknowledgment Without the far-sighted thinking of Dr. Zavin Khachaturian and the Nation= al Institute on Aging (NIA), the support for the discovery of APOE as a susceptibility locus for Alzheimer's disease would not have occurred. NIA= funding of the Joseph and Kathleen Bryan Alzheimer's Disease Research Center and the Leadership and Excellence in Alzheimer's Disease (LEAD) Award provided most of the financial support. The critical element of the= LEAD Award--not having to undergo competitive review for seven years--provided an opportunity to go in new directions, rather than pursu= e safe renewals. References 1. W.J. Strittmatter, K.H. Weisgraber, D.Y. Huang, L.M. Dong, G.S. Salvesen, M.A. Pericak-Vance et al., "Binding of human apolipoprotein E t= o synthetic amyloid beta peptide: isoform-specific effects and implications= for late-onset Alzheimer disease," Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90, 8098 (1993). 2. A.M. Saunders, W.J. Strittmatter, D. Schmechel, P.H. St. George-Hyslop= , M.A. Pericak-Vance, S.H. Joo et al., "Association of apolipoprotein E allele epsilon 4 with late-onset familial and sporadic Alzheimer's disease," Neurology 43, 1467 (1993). 3. E.H. Corder, A.M. Saunders, W.J. Strittmatter, D.E. Schmechel P.C. Gaskell, G.W. Small et al., "Gene dose of apolipoprotein E type 4 allele and the risk of Alzheimer's disease in late onset families," Science 261,= 921 (1993). (See "Comments" section.) 4. E.H. Corder, A.M. Saunders, N.J. Risch, W.J. Strittmatter, D.E. Schmechel, P.C. Gaskell Jr. et al., "Protective effect of apolipoprotein = E type 2 allele for late onset Alzheimer disease," Nat. Genet. 7, 180 (1994= ). 5. A.D. Roses, "Apolipoprotein E affects the rate of Alzheimer disease expression: beta-amyloid burden is a secondary consequence dependent on APOE genotype and duration of disease," J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 53, 429 (1994). (See "Comments" section of this review paper.) 6. A.M. Saunders, K. Schmader, J.C. Breitner, M.D. Benson, W.T. Brown, L.= Goldfarb et al., "Apolipoprotein E epsilon 4 allele distributions in late-onset Alzheimer's disease and in other amyloid-forming diseases," Lancet 342, 710 (1993). (See "Comments" section.) 7. G. Lucotte, F. David, S. Visvikis, M.B. Leininger, G. Siest, M.C. Babr= on et al., "Apolipoprotein E-epsilon 4 allele and Alzheimer's disease," Lanc= et 342, 1309 (1993). (letter) 8. J. Poirier, J. Davignon, D. Bouthillier, S. Kogan, P. Bertrand, and S.= Gauthier, "Apolipoprotein E polymorphism and Alzheimer's disease," Lancet= 342, 697 (1993). (See "Comments" section.) 9. G.W. Rebeck, J.S. Reiter, D.K. Strickland, and B.T. Hyman, "Apolipoprotein E in sporadic Alzheimer's disease: allelic variation and receptor interactions," Neuron 11, 575 (1993). 10. D.S. Borgaonkar, L.C. Schmidt, S.E. Martin, M.D. Kanzer, L. Edelsohn,= J. Growdon et al., "Linkage of late-onset Alzheimer's disease with apolipoprotein E type 4on chromosome 19," Lancet 342, 625 (1993). (letter= ) 11. A. Ueki, M. Kawano, Y. Namba, M. Kawakami, and K. Ikeda, "A high frequency of apolipoprotein E4 isoprotein in Japanese patients with late-onset nonfamilial Alzheimer's disease," Neurosci. Lett. 163, 166 (1993). 12. K. Okuizumi, O. Onodera, H. Tanaka, H. Kobayashi, S. Tsuji, H. Takahashi et al., "ApoE-epsilon 4 and early-onset Alzheimer's," Nat. Gene= t. 7, 10 (1994). (letter) 13. C.M. van Duijn, P. de Knijff, M. Cruts, A Wehnert, L.M. Havekes, A. Hofman et al., "Apolipoprotein E4 allele in a population-based study of early-onset Alzheimer's disease," Nat. Genet. 7, 74 (1994). 14. S.H. Li, G. Schilling, W.S. Young III, X.J. Li, R.L. Margolis, O.C. Stine et al., "Huntington's disease gene (IT15) is widely expressed in human and rat tissues," Neuron 11, 985 (1993). 15. S.E. Andrew, Y.P. Goldberg, B. Kremer, H. Telenius, J. Theilmann, S. Adam et al. "The relationship between trinucleotide (CAG) repeat length a= nd clinical features of Huntington's disease," Nat. Genet. 4, 398 (1993). (S= ee "Comments" section.) 16. O.C. Stine, N. Pleasant, M.L. Franz, M.H. Abbott, S.E. Folstein, and C.A. Ross, "Correlation between the onset age of Huntington's disease and= length of the trinucleotide repeat in IT-15," Hum. Mol. Genet. 2, 1547 (1993). 17. D.E. Crews, M.I. Kamboh, C.J. Mancilha, and B. Kottke, "Population genetics of apolipoprotein A-4, E, and H polymorphisms in Yanomami Indian= s of northwestern Brazil: associations with lipids, lipoproteins, and carbohydrate metabolism," Hum. Biol. 65, 211 (1993). 18. F.M. van Bockxmeer, "ApoE and ACE genes: impact on human longevity," Nat. Genet. 6, 4 (1994). 19. S.H. Han, G. Einstein, K.H. Weisgraber, W.J. Strittmatter, A.M. Saunders, V.M. Pericak et al., "Apolipoprotein E is localized to the cytoplasm of human cortical neurons: a light and electron microscopic study," J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 53, 535 (1994). 20. S.B. Prusiner, "Molecular biology of prion diseases," Science 252, 15= 15 (1991). 21. R. Medori, H.J. Tritschler, A. LeBlanc, F. Villare, V. Manetto, H.Y. Chen et al., "Fatal familial insomnia, a prion disease with a mutation at= codon 178 of the prion protein gene," N. Engl. J. Med. 326, 444 (1992). (See "Comments" section.) 22. S. Nagafuchi, H. Yanagisawa, K. Sato, T. Shirayama, E. Ohsaki, M. Bun= do et al., "Dentatorubral and pallidoluysian atrophy expansion of an unstabl= e CAG trinucleotide on chromosome 12p," Nat. Genet. 6, 14 (1994). 23. J.R. Burke, M.S. Wingfield, K.E. Lewis, A.D. Roses, J.E. Lee, C. Hulette et al., "The Haw River Syndrome: dentatorubropallidoluysian atrop= hy (DRPLA) in an African-American family," Nat. Genet. 7, 521 (1994). 24. R. Koide, T. Ikeuchi, O. Onodera, H. Tanaka, S. Igarashi, K. Endo et al., "Unstable expansion of CAG repeat in hereditary dentatorubral-pallidoluysian atrophy (DRPLA)," Nat. Genet. 6, 9 (1994). 25. F. Schachter, D.L. Faure, F. Guenot, H. Rouger, P. Froguel, G.L. Lesueur et al., "Genetic associations with human longevity at the APOE an= d ACE loci," Nat. Genet. 6, 29 (1994). 26. G.W. Small, J.C. Mazziotta, M.T. Collins, L.R. Baxter, M.E. Phelps, M.A. Mandelkern et al., "Apolipoprotein E type 4 allele and cerebral glucose metabolism in relatives at risk for familial Alzheimer disease," JAMA (in press). 27. S.B. Prusiner, "Genetic and infectious prion diseases," Arch. Neurol.= 50, 1129 (1993). 28. H.G. Harley, J.D. Brook, S.A. Rundle, S. Crow, W. Reardon, A.J. Buckl= er et al., "Expansion of an unstable DNA region and phenotypic variation in myotonic dystrophy," Nature 355, 545 (1992). (See "Comments" section.) 29. A.D. Roses, "Myotonic dystrophy," in The Molecular and Genetic Basis = of Neurological Disease, R.N. Rosenberg, S.B. Prusiner, S. DiMauro, R.L. Barchi, and L.M. Kunkel, Eds. (Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, 1993), pp. 633-646. 30. W.J. Strittmatter, K.H. Weisgraber, M. Goedert, A.M. Saunders, D. Huang, E.H. Corder et al., "Hypothesis: microtubule instability and paire= d helical filament formation in the Alzheimer disease brain are related to apolipoprotein E genotype," Exp. Neurol. 125, 163 (1994) (review). 31. J. Hardy and D. Allsop, "Amyloid deposition as the central event in t= he aetiology of Alzheimer's disease," Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 12, 383 (1991) (review). 32. D.J. Selkoe, "Alzheimer's disease: a central role for amyloid," J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 53, 438 (1994). (See "Comments" section of this= review paper.) 33. D. Garnes, D. Adams, R. Alessandrini, R. Barbour, T. Carr, J. Clemens= et al., "Alzheimer-type neuropathology in transgenic mice overexpressing V717F beta-amyloid precursor protein," Nature 373 523 (1995). 34. S.H. Han, C. Hulette, A.M. Saunders, G. Einstein, V.M. Pericak, W.J. Strittmatter et al., "Apolipoprotein E is present in hippocampal neurons without neurofibrillary tangles in Alzheimer's disease and in age-matched= controls," Exp. Neurol. 128, 13 (1994). 35. D.E. Schmechel, A.M. Saunders, W.J. Strittmatter, B.J. Crain, C.M. Hulette, S.H. Joo et al., "Increased amyloid beta-peptide deposition in cerebral cortex as a consequence of apolipoprotein E genotype in late-ons= et Alzheimer disease," Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90, 9649 (1993). 36. L.G. Goldfarb, R.B. Petersen, M. Tabaton, P. Brown, A.C. LeBlanc, P. Montagna et al., "Fatal familial insomnia and familial Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: disease phenotype determined by a DNA polymorphism," Science 258= , 806 (1992). 37. T.T. Warner, G.G. Lennox, I. Janota, and A.E. Harding, "Autosomal-dominant dentatorubropallidoluysian atrophy in the United Kingdom," Mov. Disord. 9, 289 (1994). 38. J.F. Diedrich, H. Minnigan, R.I. Carp, J.N. Whitaker, R. Race, W. Fre= y II et al., "Neuropathological changes in scrapie and Alzheimer's disease are associated with increased expression of apolipoprotein E and cathepsi= n D in astrocytes," J. Virol. 65, 4759 (1991). 39. J. Poirier, A. Baccichet, D. Dea, and S. Gauthier, "Cholesterol synthesis and lipoprotein reuptake during synaptic remodelling in hippocampus in adult rats," Neuroscience 55, 81 (1993). 40. E. Masliah, M. Mallory, N. Ge, M. Alford, I. Veinbergs, and A.D. Rose= s, "Neurodegeneration in the central nervous system of apoE-deficient mice,"= Exp. Neurol. (submitted for publication). 41. T. Reed, D. Carmelli, G.E. Swan, J.C.S. Breitner, K.A. Welsh, G.P. Jarvik et al., "Lower cognitive performance in normal older male twins carrying the apolipoprotein Ee4 allele," Arch. Neurol. 51, 11 (1994). 42. B. Tardiff, M. Newman, A. Saunders, W. Strittmatter, L.R. Smith, A. Roses et al., "Apolipoprotein E allele frequency in patients with cogniti= ve defects following cardiopulmonary bypass," Circulation 90, 1 (1994). 43. R.L. Hamilton, J.S. Wong, L.S. Guo, S. Krisans, and R.J. Havel, "Apolipoprotein E localization in rat hepatocytes by immunogold labeling = of cryothin sections," J. Lipid Res. 31, 1589 (1990). 44. P.W.F. Wilson, R.H. Myers, M.G. Larson, J.M. Ordovas, P.A. Wolf, and E.J. Schaefer, "Apolipoprotein E alleles, dyslipidemia, and coronary hear= t disease: the Framingham offspring study," JAMA 272, 1666 (1994). 45. A.D. Roses, "The Alzheimer diseases," in Current Neurology, S.H. Appe= l, Ed. (Mosby-Year Book, Chicago, 1994), pp. 111-141. *Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Bryan Research Building, Room 227, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710-2900. Comments intended for publication should be addressed to Advice and Dissent, The Journal Of= NIH Research, 1444 I St., N.W., Suite 1000, Washington, DC 20005. Allen D. Roses is the Jefferson Pilot Professor of Neurobiology and Neurology in the Departments of Medicine and Neurobiology, Bryan Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, N.C. ---------------------------------------------------------------------= --- --PART.BOUNDARY.0.23195.emout04.mail.aol.com.809155340--