 |
 |
I agree with this suggestion 100% Henry Guttentag ([log in to unmask] You wrote: > >This suggestion gets my vote. > >Milo V. Anderson >Box 417 >Angwin, CA 94508 >VOICE 707 965-2508 >EMAIL [log in to unmask] > >On Wed, 27 Sep 1995, Joanna Porvin wrote: > >> Hi Folks. >> >> I wanted to offer another opinion as we talk through what to do with the >> list. Two lists is a viable option. However, another possibility is >> being more specific in the Subject Heading. For example: >> >> * POEM: Sunday & The Parkie With George >> * DRUGS: Sinemet & Diet >> * SYMPTOMS: Foot Curling >> * STORY: Our Visit in Holland >> * ACTION: Walk-a-thon in Detroit >> * ACTION: Target Senator for UDALL Bill >> * REQUEST: Information on Propath >> >> This would let folks decide easily which messages to focus on. I've seen >> it work successfully on other lists. >> >> Also, I think we should more carefully edit posts where we repond to >> other posts. It is helpful for context to see the original message. But >> often, a few lines would be sufficient. And it's best if you put them at >> the end of the message, rather than the beginning. (Then they're there >> if you need them, but they're aren't in the way. >> >> Just some thoughts... >> >> Joanna >> >