 |
 |
Yes OCCASSIONALLY I see a message that probably does not give information to the whole group but when you start making requests like this you discourage people from making posts to the list and everyone out there has a valuable contribution to the list. Some chose not to make them because they are afraid of getting a response such as this. I personally am willing to see some of them from time to time just to be sure that no one is leaving something out for fear they will offend some of those who think they know what is best for everyone else on the list. Nancy Walker [log in to unmask] >Hello everyone, > >Joyce and I were gone for a few days and did not unsubscribe. We had a LOT >of messages when we got back. > >I am sure all of you have noticed mail from one person directly to another >that most of the time does not have useful information for all 900+ of us >worldwide. Yet, we click on and spend a minute or two just to realize its >not for us. What a waste of precious time and energy...both of which most >of us do not have an extra supply of. > >Lisa sent Kathy a private note....by accident she posted it here....then she >realized it and sent us all an apology. Thanks Lisa for being aware and >thoughtful enuf to realize ur error. > >FOR THE REST OF US ALL....PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REVIEW IN YOUR MIND IF YOUR >MESSAGE IS PRIVATE OR IF IT WILL BE BENEFITIAL FOR ALL OF US. IF IT WILL >NOT BE OF USE TO ANYONE EXCEPT WHO YOU ARE SENDING IT TO....PSE READ THE >HEADERS, THE FOOTERS WHERE IT SAYS "REPLY TO" AND SEND IT TO THAT >ADDRESS. THANKS. > >Also, many of us would prefer to send private answers in reply to a net >posted message. When you post a list message, at your signature, please >put your email address. That will help the non computer people who would >find it difficult to look at the headers etc for your address. > >Its not hard folks, please try it and save the rest of us precious moments. > >thanks > >joyce and chuck tames >[log in to unmask] > >