 |
 |
Att: Diane Turner In the past I have been guilty of not sharing comments and intend not to repeat this error in judgment. I feel Diane made a good case in her posting urging that all list members keep their individual responses to a minimum. It is tantalizing to read someone's request for information and then never see replies. If a meaningful survey were to be made, my guess is that the percentage of members who relate to some degree to the original author would be surprisingly high. A. Lee Belcher / [log in to unmask] On Fri, 10 Nov 1995, Douglas K. Turner wrote: > The info on this list has been invaluable to me. But it becomes less > valuable if people respond to posts privately. For example NADH was > called both coenzyme 1 and co Q10 on the list. Some people posted > privately to others that they were not the some thing. Then, thank > goodness, the fact was posted for all to see. > > We are all trying to help ourselves. Thats why we are on the list. > Everybodies input is important because we are all in this leaking boat > together and each of us knows something that someone else needs to know. > Eveybodies comments, insights, explanations, critisisms etc. are needed > because collectively we know alot. Its the diversity of backgrounds and > expertises that makes this list great. With 900 minds focused on the same > problems we are a wealth of information and a great help to each other. > > When you post privately not only does the group miss your thoughts but you > miss the input from 899 interested, researching, thinking people. > > I think we should all post to the list and let each one of us individually > choose what to read and what not to read. Its important. > > Diane > -- > Diane Turner > [log in to unmask] >