 |
 |
In a message dated 95-11-13 15:01:49 EST, you write: >This is not to say that others out there don't have something >to add, but rather several of us have taken a pro-active >stance on this issue, and are simply trying to keep the size >of the "working group" at an efficient level [however - >comments, input, etc. are always welcomed and >encouraged, either as personal posts or global ones]. The >point to be made is that until definitive answers to the >question[s] have been obtained, global broadcast of >intermediate messages is not warranted in my opinion. Then again, if the "working group" keeps all correspondence private until definitive answers have been obtained it's going to be a bit difficult for anyone else to comment, isn't it? Personally, I prefer to watch y'all struggle toward an answer--it makes me feel a part of the process, even though I am not contributing to the discussion. my $.02. manderwiz, also known as joyce and/or jessie