 |
 |
I agree with Joyce. Even if alot of the discussion is technical I get something from it and eventually I might even understand the "technical talk" enough to interact, or at least enough to have an intelligent conversation with my Dad's doctor. Nancy Walker [log in to unmask] >In a message dated 95-11-13 15:01:49 EST, you write: > >>This is not to say that others out there don't have something >>to add, but rather several of us have taken a pro-active >>stance on this issue, and are simply trying to keep the size >>of the "working group" at an efficient level [however - >>comments, input, etc. are always welcomed and >>encouraged, either as personal posts or global ones]. The >>point to be made is that until definitive answers to the >>question[s] have been obtained, global broadcast of >>intermediate messages is not warranted in my opinion. > >Then again, if the "working group" keeps all correspondence private until >definitive answers have been obtained it's going to be a bit difficult for >anyone else to comment, isn't it? Personally, I prefer to watch y'all >struggle toward an answer--it makes me feel a part of the process, even >though I am not contributing to the discussion. > >my $.02. > >manderwiz, also known as joyce and/or jessie > >