Roger -- This is mildly amusing, but I'm afraid I don't get some of the intended joke. What r word? See you at the meeting Monday. Am gathering lists of books and copying articles on ESL. Margaret > > Rachel Nash and Larry Sianchuk, two graduate students at Waterloo, wrote > the following story and before reading it in class announced that it had > a moral. I asked them for their permission to publish it here. So what's > the moral to the story. > > TV Guide > > The WRiting ER > > In this week's episode: A demure sophmore is rushed in, her poli-sci essay > haemorrhaging with run-on sentences. Meanwhile, WritingER staff are > already against the wall--literally--trying to cope with a raging freshman > suffering with a severe case of protracted writer's block (he's been in a > chemically-induced psychosis since frosh week). Eventually, a couple of > football players, cramming for their English Language Proficiency Exam, > step in and subdue the lad. In the midst of the melee, perennial PhD > candidate Shirk Grantless, who's been serving as the assistant director > of ER for the last five years, experiences a spiritual crisis when he > finally confronts his own addiction to figures of speech: cliches and > similes being his tropes of choice. He adds to the commotion by wailing > like there was no tommorrow over the pain of his cross-addiction, > screaming that no wonder he can't even write a successful funding > proposal--the ER is (and has for too many years been) desperately in need > of computer upgrades and an expressivist-writer's heart-on-sleeve > defribrillator; and no wonder, Shirk continues to ruminate, that he can't > even muster the discourse to ask the Chief Writing Surgeon (elegant > 30-something Justin Case) out for a date. But, in the end, everything > works out when a former patient, the now rich 'n famous documentation > guru Perc O'Tooles, endows the ER with an ultra-generous donation of both > cash and volunteer writing consultants from the REAL WORLD. > > > The hint that Rachel and Larry provided us with was: > > Never use the R word. >